QQQD ranks 21st and ETHD 25th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
ETHD vs QQQD
QQQD −0.45pt a year
0.95%0.50%
ETHD 8.4×the volume
570K68.1K
ETHD vs QQQD Performance
+1.5%−0.7%
- ETHD 0.95%
- QQQD 0.50%, better
- ETHD $64M
- QQQD $28M
- ETHD +1.5%, better
- QQQD −0.7%
- ETHD 18.27%, better
- QQQD 3.35%
- ETHD 1
- QQQD 3
- ETHD 570K sh, better
- QQQD 68.1K sh
- ETHD $34.36
- QQQD $12.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ETHD | QQQD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | F0 | |
| Risk | D31 | B67Higher |
| Tradability | B59Higher | C43 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C52Higher | D38 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. ETHD and QQQD are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ETHDC
QQQDC
In short
ETHD The only ETF aiming at -2x the daily move in ether, per ProShares. It gets there with swaps and futures rather than an actual short position, resets every day, and charges 0.95%.
QQQD Fading the Magnificent 7 without a leverage multiplier: QQQD aims for -100% of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index's daily move, one-for-one, at 0.50% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
ETHD The fund seeks daily results equal to negative two times the daily performance of the Bloomberg Ethereum Index, before fees and expenses.
QQQD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse performance of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ETHD vs QQQD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ETHD vs QQQD Cost
Overpaying ETHD vs QQQD
$7,890
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ETHD 0.95%
$17,869
QQQD 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ETHD | QQQD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $900 | $778 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $3,460 | $2,862 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $9,979 | $7,890 |
- 0.95%ETHD
- 0.50%QQQD, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QQQD cheapest of 53 funds
ETHD 6th cheapest of 53 funds
ETHD vs QQQD Dividends
- ETHD 18.27%, better
- QQQD 3.35%
- ETHD $6.28
- QQQD $0.41
- ETHD $0.19
- QQQD $0.10
- ETHD Oct 1, 2026
- QQQD Sep 22, 2026
- ETHD Oct 7, 2026
- QQQD Sep 29, 2026
- ETHD Monthly
- QQQD Quarterly
Distribution history
ETHD vs QQQD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ETHD 130.0%QQQD 21.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- ETHD −0.10QQQD −1.14
- Worst fall
- ETHD −96.5%QQQD −51.4%
- Market sensitivity
- ETHD −3.93QQQD −1.35
ETHD and QQQD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
