RWM ranks 4th and ETHD 25th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
ETHD vs RWM
13.6%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
RWM 52.7×the volume
570K30M
ETHD vs RWM Performance
+1.5%−10.2%
- ETHD 0.95%
- RWM 0.95%
- ETHD $64M
- RWM $163M
- ETHD +1.5%, better
- RWM −10.2%
- ETHD 18.27%, better
- RWM 3.32%
- ETHD 1
- RWM 3
- ETHD 570K sh
- RWM 30M sh, better
- ETHD $34.36
- RWM $14.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ETHD | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | F0 | |
| Risk | D31 | B61Higher |
| Tradability | B59 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | B63 | |
| Durability | C52 | B69Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. ETHD and RWM are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ETHDC
RWMB
In short
ETHD The only ETF aiming at -2x the daily move in ether, per ProShares. It gets there with swaps and futures rather than an actual short position, resets every day, and charges 0.95%.
RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
ETHD The fund seeks daily results equal to negative two times the daily performance of the Bloomberg Ethereum Index, before fees and expenses.
RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ETHD vs RWM Holdings
How ETHD and RWM differ
13.6%
Shared holdings make up 100% of ETHD and 13.6% of RWM.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings13.6%
Sector
No Sector split for ETHD.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for ETHD.
Concentration
- ETHD100.0%
- RWM100.0%
- ETHD0
- RWM2
Asset class
- ETHD
- Alternatives
- RWM
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in ETHD0
- In both0
- Only in RWM2
Only in ETHD
0 securities, 0.0% of ETHD by weight
Only in RWM
2 securities, 86.4% of RWM by weight
- Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf81.69%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-174.71%
Weight gaps
ETHD and RWM share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ETHD vs RWM Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ETHD 0.95%
$17,869
RWM 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ETHD | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%ETHD
- 0.95%RWM
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
ETHD 6th cheapest of 53 funds
RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
ETHD vs RWM Dividends
- ETHD 18.27%, better
- RWM 3.32%
- ETHD $6.28
- RWM $0.48
- ETHD $0.19
- RWM $0.09
- ETHD Oct 1, 2026
- RWM Sep 23, 2026
- ETHD Oct 7, 2026
- RWM Sep 29, 2026
- ETHD Monthly
- RWM Quarterly
Distribution history
ETHD vs RWM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ETHD 130.0%RWM 18.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- ETHD −0.10RWM −0.99
- Worst fall
- ETHD −96.5%RWM −43.7%
- Market sensitivity
- ETHD −3.93RWM −1.23
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.