ETHW ranks 4th and QETH 9th of 11 funds in the Spot Ether Category.
ETHW vs QETH
0.0%by weight
ETHW −0.05pt a year
0.20%0.25%
ETHW 20.8×the volume
735K35.3K
ETHW vs QETH Performance
−38.8%−38.8%
- ETHW 0.20%, better
- QETH 0.25%
- ETHW $244M
- QETH $19M
- ETHW −38.8%
- QETH −38.8%
- ETHW 1
- QETH 1
- ETHW 735K sh, better
- QETH 35.3K sh
- ETHW $15.93
- QETH $22.13
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ETHW | QETH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70Higher | D30 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | D39 | D39 |
| Tradability | D38 | C43Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C47Higher | C43 |
Rank among Spot Ether funds
Same Category. ETHW and QETH are both graded against the same 11 Spot Ether funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ETHWB
QETHC
In short
ETHW Spot ether with a conscience clause: Bitwise pledged 10% of the fund's profits to Ethereum's open-source developers. It holds ether directly, no derivatives, at a fee below the spot-ether norm.
QETH Invesco paired with crypto specialist Galaxy for a no-frills spot ether trust: it holds the coin and marks it against the Lukka Prime reference rate. True to its mandate, priced at the category median, smaller than the field's heavyweights.
Stated mandate
ETHW The Trust seeks exposure to the value of ether held by it, less operating expenses and liabilities. It holds ether directly, values its assets using an ether pricing benchmark, and does not use derivatives.
QETH The Trust seeks to reflect the performance of ether’s spot price, measured using the Lukka Prime Ethereum Reference Rate.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ETHW vs QETH Holdings
How ETHW and QETH differ
0.0%
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for ETHW and QETH.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for ETHW and QETH.
Concentration
- ETHW100.0%
- QETH100.0%
- ETHW1
- QETH1
Asset class
- ETHW
- Alternatives
- QETH
- Alternatives
Holdings
- Only in ETHW1
- In both0
- Only in QETH1
Only in ETHW
1 security, 100% of ETHW by weight
- Ethereum100.00%
Only in QETH
1 security, 100% of QETH by weight
- Physical Ether100.00%
Weight gaps
ETHW and QETH share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ETHW vs QETH Cost
Overpaying QETH vs ETHW
$1,004
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ETHW 0.20%
$4,155
QETH 0.25%
$5,159
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ETHW | QETH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $455 | $90 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $1,769 | $348 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $5,159 | $1,004 |
- 0.20%ETHW, cheaper
- 0.25%QETH
- Middle half of Spot Ether funds
- Median 0.21%
ETHW 4th cheapest of 11 funds
QETH 7th cheapest of 11 funds
ETHW vs QETH Dividends
- ETHW None
- QETH None
Distribution history
ETHW vs QETH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ETHW 75.5%QETH 75.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- ETHW 0.06QETH 0.06Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- ETHW −67.9%QETH −67.9%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Market sensitivity
- ETHW 2.63QETH 2.62
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.