EUM ranks 8th and QQQD 21st of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
EUM vs QQQD
QQQD −0.45pt a year
0.95%0.50%
EUM 1.5×the volume
99.6K68.1K
EUM vs QQQD Performance
−12.0%−0.7%
- EUM 0.95%
- QQQD 0.50%, better
- EUM $15M
- QQQD $28M
- EUM −12.0%
- QQQD −0.7%, better
- EUM 3.33%
- QQQD 3.35%, better
- EUM 2
- QQQD 3
- EUM 99.6K sh, better
- QQQD 68.1K sh
- EUM $17.21
- QQQD $12.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EUM | QQQD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B65 | B67Higher |
| Tradability | A74Higher | C43 |
| Holdings | B63 | |
| Durability | B57Higher | D38 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. EUM and QQQD are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EUMB
QQQDC
In short
EUM The only US ETF built to track the MSCI Emerging Markets Index upside down, one-for-one, one day at a time. Its ProShares sibling doubles the move; this one keeps it at -1x. Fee: 0.95%, net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
QQQD Fading the Magnificent 7 without a leverage multiplier: QQQD aims for -100% of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index's daily move, one-for-one, at 0.50% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
EUM The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index.
QQQD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse performance of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EUM vs QQQD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EUM vs QQQD Cost
Overpaying EUM vs QQQD
$7,890
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EUM 0.95%
$17,869
QQQD 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EUM | QQQD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $900 | $778 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $3,460 | $2,862 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $9,979 | $7,890 |
- 0.95%EUM
- 0.50%QQQD, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QQQD cheapest of 53 funds
EUM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
EUM vs QQQD Dividends
- EUM 3.33%
- QQQD 3.35%, better
- EUM $0.57
- QQQD $0.41
- EUM $0.13
- QQQD $0.10
- EUM Sep 23, 2026
- QQQD Sep 22, 2026
- EUM Sep 29, 2026
- QQQD Sep 29, 2026
- EUM Quarterly
- QQQD Quarterly
Distribution history
EUM vs QQQD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EUM 15.7%QQQD 21.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- EUM −1.26QQQD −1.14
- Worst fall
- EUM −50.9%QQQD −51.4%
- Market sensitivity
- EUM −0.72QQQD −1.35
EUM and QQQD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
