RWM ranks 4th and EUM 8th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
EUM vs RWM
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
RWM 301.4×the volume
99.6K30M
EUM +2.9pt
−8.2%−11.1%
EUM vs RWM Performance
−20.2%−18.3%
- EUM 0.95%
- RWM 0.95%
- EUM $15M
- RWM $163M
- EUM −12.0%
- RWM −10.2%, better
- EUM 3.33%, better
- RWM 3.32%
- EUM 2
- RWM 3
- EUM 99.6K sh
- RWM 30M sh, better
- EUM $17.21
- RWM $14.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EUM | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B65Higher | B61 |
| Tradability | A74 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | B63 | B63 |
| Durability | B57 | B69Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. EUM and RWM are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EUMB
RWMB
In short
EUM The only US ETF built to track the MSCI Emerging Markets Index upside down, one-for-one, one day at a time. Its ProShares sibling doubles the move; this one keeps it at -1x. Fee: 0.95%, net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
EUM The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index.
RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EUM vs RWM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EUM vs RWM Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EUM 0.95%
$17,869
RWM 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EUM | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%EUM
- 0.95%RWM
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
EUM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
EUM vs RWM Dividends
- EUM 3.33%, better
- RWM 3.32%
- EUM $0.57
- RWM $0.48
- EUM $0.13
- RWM $0.09
- EUM Sep 23, 2026
- RWM Sep 23, 2026
- EUM Sep 29, 2026
- RWM Sep 29, 2026
- EUM Quarterly
- RWM Quarterly
Distribution history
EUM vs RWM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EUM
- RWM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EUM 15.7%, betterRWM 18.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- EUM −1.26RWM −0.99, better
- Worst fall
- EUM −50.9%RWM −43.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EUM −0.72RWM −1.23
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.