RWM ranks 4th and EUO 7th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
EUO vs RWM
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
RWM 1343.7×the volume
22.3K30M
EUO +14.2pt
+2.9%−11.3%
EUO vs RWM Performance
+30.4%−15.9%
- EUO 0.95%
- RWM 0.95%
- EUO $45M
- RWM $163M
- EUO +11.0%, better
- RWM −10.1%
- EUO
- RWM 3.31%
- EUO 1
- RWM 3
- EUO 22.3K sh
- RWM 30M sh, better
- EUO $32.47
- RWM $14.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EUO | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A94Higher | B60 |
| Tradability | C49 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | B63 | |
| Durability | B67 | B69Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. EUO and RWM are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EUOB
RWMB
In short
EUO A single-purpose dollar-versus-euro tool: EUO aims to deliver twice the inverse of the euro's daily move against the dollar. Live since 2008, and priced under the typical leveraged or inverse fund.
RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
EUO EUO seeks daily results, before fees and expenses, intended to deliver twice the inverse of the euro's daily price performance against the U.S. dollar.
RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EUO vs RWM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EUO vs RWM Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EUO 0.95%
$17,869
RWM 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EUO | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%EUO
- 0.95%RWM
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
EUO 6th cheapest of 53 funds
RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
EUO vs RWM Dividends
- EUO
- RWM 3.31%
- EUO None
- RWM $0.48
- EUO
- RWM $0.09
- EUO
- RWM Sep 23, 2026
- EUO
- RWM Sep 29, 2026
- EUO
- RWM Quarterly
Distribution history
EUO vs RWM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EUO
- RWM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EUO 13.9%, betterRWM 18.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- EUO −0.17, betterRWM −0.99
- Worst fall
- EUO −25.3%, betterRWM −43.7%
- Market sensitivity
- EUO −0.35RWM −1.23
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.