SCHZ ranks 2nd and EUSB 20th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
EUSB vs SCHZ
SCHZ −0.09pt a year
0.12%0.03%
SCHZ 43.6×the volume
54.3K2.37M
EUSB +0.3pt
+0.1%−0.2%
EUSB vs SCHZ Performance
+0.4%−1.0%
- EUSB 0.12%
- SCHZ 0.03%, better
- EUSB $711M
- SCHZ $10.8B
- EUSB −0.3%
- SCHZ −0.2%, better
- EUSB 4.06%
- SCHZ 4.27%, better
- EUSB 4423
- SCHZ 12610
- EUSB 54.3K sh
- SCHZ 2.37M sh, better
- EUSB $42.31
- SCHZ $22.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EUSB | SCHZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C47 | C47 |
| Tradability | C53 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | A77 | A78Higher |
| Durability | B68 | A88Higher |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. EUSB and SCHZ are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EUSBA
SCHZA
In short
EUSB A total-bond-market build with a conscience clause: thousands of taxable dollar bonds, screened for ESG ratings and stripped of fossil fuel issuers, at a fee well under the typical broad bond ETF.
SCHZ Schwab's core bond holding: the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market, over 10,000 issues deep, for 0.03% a year. That is the floor of a category whose median fee is more than ten times higher. Running since 2011, pays monthly.
Stated mandate
EUSB The Fund seeks to track the Bloomberg MSCI US Universal Choice ESG Screened Index, an index of U.S. dollar-denominated taxable bonds with favorable ESG ratings and extensive screens, including fossil-fuel exclusions.
SCHZ The fund seeks to track the total return of an index representing the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EUSB vs SCHZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EUSB vs SCHZ Cost
Overpaying EUSB vs SCHZ
$1,882
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EUSB 0.12%
$2,520
SCHZ 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EUSB | SCHZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $220 | $55 | $165 |
| 20 | $859 | $216 | $643 |
| 30 | $2,520 | $638 | $1,882 |
- 0.12%EUSB
- 0.03%SCHZ, cheaper
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SCHZ 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
EUSB 21st cheapest of 114 funds
EUSB vs SCHZ Dividends
- EUSB 4.06%
- SCHZ 4.27%, better
- EUSB $1.72
- SCHZ $0.96
- EUSB $0.15
- SCHZ $0.08
- EUSB Oct 1, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 1, 2026
- EUSB Oct 6, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 7, 2026
- EUSB Monthly
- SCHZ Monthly
Distribution history
EUSB vs SCHZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EUSB
- SCHZ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EUSB 5.4%, betterSCHZ 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- EUSB 0.21, betterSCHZ 0.17
- Worst fall
- EUSB −16.9%, betterSCHZ −17.5%
- Market sensitivity
- EUSB 0.94SCHZ 0.99
EUSB and SCHZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
