FEZ ranks 4th and EWL 6th of 12 funds in the Europe Region Category.
EWL vs FEZ
FEZ −0.21pt a year
0.50%0.29%
FEZ 1.7×the volume
502K857K
EWL +0.4pt
+10.5%+10.1%
EWL vs FEZ Performance
+42.7%+58.5%
- EWL 0.50%
- FEZ 0.29%, better
- EWL $3.02B
- FEZ $4.16B
- EWL +18.3%, better
- FEZ +6.9%
- EWL 1.69%
- FEZ 2.81%, better
- EWL 44
- FEZ 53
- EWL 502K sh
- FEZ 857K sh, better
- EWL $64.27
- FEZ $65.89
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWL | FEZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B59 | A72Higher |
| Mission | A73 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B67Higher | C42 |
| Tradability | A74Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | D29 | C52Higher |
| Durability | A78Higher | A77 |
Rank among Europe Region funds
Same Category. EWL and FEZ are both graded against the same 12 Europe Region funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWLB
FEZA
In short
EWL One US-listed ticker for Switzerland's blue chips: roughly 40 names, franc exposure included, running since 1996. A concentrated slice of a defensive market rather than a broad Europe fund.
FEZ Fifty eurozone blue chips, one ticker, running since 2002. FEZ is the long-standing US-listed route into the euro area's biggest companies, and it charges well below the typical index fund in its peer group.
Stated mandate
EWL The fund seeks to track the MSCI Switzerland 25/50 Index (Net), an index representing Swiss equities.
FEZ The fund seeks to deliver total returns that generally correspond to the EURO STOXX 50 Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWL vs FEZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWL vs FEZ Cost
Overpaying EWL vs FEZ
$4,027
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWL 0.50%
$9,979
FEZ 0.29%
$5,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWL | FEZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $527 | $373 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $2,044 | $1,416 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $5,952 | $4,027 |
- 0.50%EWL
- 0.29%FEZ, cheaper
- Middle half of Europe Region funds
- Median 0.51%
FEZ 4th cheapest of 12 funds
EWL 5th cheapest of 12 funds
EWL vs FEZ Dividends
- EWL 1.69%
- FEZ 2.81%, better
- EWL $1.09
- FEZ $1.83
- EWL $1.09
- FEZ $0.11
- EWL Jun 15, 2026
- FEZ Sep 21, 2026
- EWL Jun 18, 2026
- FEZ Sep 23, 2026
- EWL Annual
- FEZ Quarterly
Distribution history
EWL vs FEZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EWL
- FEZ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWL 15.3%FEZ 14.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EWL 0.85FEZ 1.02, better
- Worst fall
- EWL −29.0%, betterFEZ −35.1%
- Market sensitivity
- EWL 0.90FEZ 0.95
EWL and FEZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

