FLEU ranks 3rd and EWL 6th of 12 funds in the Europe Region Category.
EWL vs FLEU
FLEU −0.41pt a year
0.50%0.09%
EWL 82.5×the volume
502K6.09K
FLEU +2.8pt
+7.4%+10.2%
EWL vs FLEU Performance
+42.7%+62.4%
- EWL 0.50%
- FLEU 0.09%, better
- EWL $3.02B
- FLEU $68M
- EWL +18.3%, better
- FLEU +8.1%
- EWL 1.69%
- FLEU 2.84%, better
- EWL 44
- FLEU 265
- EWL 502K sh, better
- FLEU 6.09K sh
- EWL $64.27
- FLEU $33.86
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWL | FLEU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B59 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A73 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B67Higher | C52 |
| Tradability | A74Higher | D31 |
| Holdings | D29 | A77Higher |
| Durability | A78Higher | D28 |
Rank among Europe Region funds
Same Category. EWL and FLEU are both graded against the same 12 Europe Region funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWLB
FLEUA
In short
EWL One US-listed ticker for Switzerland's blue chips: roughly 40 names, franc exposure included, running since 1996. A concentrated slice of a defensive market rather than a broad Europe fund.
FLEU The euro bloc, straight up: no UK, no Swiss francs, no hedging overlay. Franklin charges 0.09% a year to track the FTSE Developed Eurozone Index, a fraction of the median fee among index funds in its peer group.
Stated mandate
EWL The fund seeks to track the MSCI Switzerland 25/50 Index (Net), an index representing Swiss equities.
FLEU The Fund uses a passive indexing approach and seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the FTSE Developed Eurozone Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWL vs FLEU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWL vs FLEU Cost
Overpaying EWL vs FLEU
$8,081
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWL 0.50%
$9,979
FLEU 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWL | FLEU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $165 | $735 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $646 | $2,814 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $1,898 | $8,081 |
- 0.50%EWL
- 0.09%FLEU, cheaper
- Middle half of Europe Region funds
- Median 0.51%
FLEU 2nd cheapest of 12 funds
EWL 5th cheapest of 12 funds
EWL vs FLEU Dividends
- EWL 1.69%
- FLEU 2.84%, better
- EWL $1.09
- FLEU $0.96
- EWL $1.09
- FLEU $0.58
- EWL Jun 15, 2026
- FLEU Jun 26, 2026
- EWL Jun 18, 2026
- FLEU Jul 6, 2026
- EWL Annual
- FLEU Twice a year
Distribution history
EWL vs FLEU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EWL
- FLEU
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWL 15.3%FLEU 14.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EWL 0.85FLEU 1.07, better
- Worst fall
- EWL −29.0%FLEU −18.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EWL 0.90FLEU 1.02
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.