FLKR ranks 14th and EWUS 23rd of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
EWUS vs FLKR
FLKR −0.50pt a year
0.59%0.09%
FLKR 288.0×the volume
2.92K842K
FLKR +12.1pt
+2.5%+14.6%
EWUS vs FLKR Performance
+13.0%+98.1%
- EWUS 0.59%
- FLKR 0.09%, better
- EWUS $40M
- FLKR $1.57B
- EWUS +17.5%
- FLKR +60.7%, better
- EWUS 2.99%
- FLKR 3.12%, better
- EWUS 197
- FLKR 148
- EWUS 2.92K sh
- FLKR 842K sh, better
- EWUS $44.60
- FLKR $45.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWUS | FLKR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F18 | A93Higher |
| Mission | A81Higher | B57 |
| Risk | C40Higher | F23 |
| Tradability | D25 | C49Higher |
| Holdings | A88Higher | C53 |
| Durability | C44 | B60Higher |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. EWUS and FLKR are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWUSC
FLKRB
In short
EWUS Britain only, small caps only. While the broad funds in its category spread across the developed world, EWUS tracks a single MSCI index of roughly 200 small UK companies, and has done so since 2012.
FLKR Korea in one passive basket for 0.09% a year, a fraction of the 0.50% typical single-country fee. Roughly 160 Korean names tracking a capped FTSE index, run as plain index plumbing rather than a stock-picking bet.
Stated mandate
EWUS The fund seeks to track an index of small-capitalization equities from the United Kingdom.
FLKR The Fund uses a passive indexing approach to seek returns that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the FTSE South Korea Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWUS vs FLKR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWUS vs FLKR Cost
Overpaying EWUS vs FLKR
$9,737
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWUS 0.59%
$11,635
FLKR 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWUS | FLKR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $165 | $893 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $646 | $3,405 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $1,898 | $9,737 |
- 0.59%EWUS
- 0.09%FLKR, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLKR cheapest of 38 funds
EWUS 29th cheapest of 38 funds
EWUS vs FLKR Dividends
- EWUS 2.99%
- FLKR 3.12%, better
- EWUS $1.36
- FLKR $1.47
- EWUS $0.54
- FLKR $0.30
- EWUS Jun 15, 2026
- FLKR Jun 26, 2026
- EWUS Jun 18, 2026
- FLKR Jul 6, 2026
- EWUS Twice a year
- FLKR Twice a year
Distribution history
EWUS vs FLKR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EWUS
- FLKR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWUS 17.5%, betterFLKR 43.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- EWUS 0.84FLKR 0.97, better
- Worst fall
- EWUS −44.9%FLKR −41.3%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EWUS 1.16FLKR 2.57
EWUS and FLKR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





