Skip to content
etf.net

EYES vs LOHA

Corgi Data & Surveillance ETF

EYESCCboe

Roundhill HALO ETF

LOHABCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

EYES0.35%LOHA0.35%

Avg volume · 30D

LOHA 16.1×the volume

EYES1.93KLOHA31.1K

EYES vs LOHA Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+13.5%EYES+1.8%LOHA

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. EYES +13.5%. LOHA +1.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%5%10%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
EYES 0.35%
LOHA 0.35%
Fund size
EYES $1M
LOHA $35M
Holdings
EYES 35
LOHA 102
Avg volume (30D)
EYES 1.93K sh
LOHA 31.1K sh, better
NAV per share
EYES $30.16
LOHA $26.46
52W range

ETF.net Grade

EYES: Cost 60, Risk 6, Mission not scored, Tradability 62, Holdings 37, Durability 23. LOHA: Cost 60, Risk 79, Mission not scored, Tradability 54, Holdings 92, Durability 51.
Pillar letters and Scores for EYES, LOHA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarEYESLOHA
Cost30% weightB60B60
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightF6A79Higher
Tradability15% weightB62HigherC54
Holdings10% weightD37A92Higher
Durability5% weightF23C51Higher

Rank among US Thematic funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. EYES and LOHA are both graded against the same 22 US Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Thematic⁠

Category · 22 funds
See all 22 ›

LOHA ranks 3rd and EYES 11th of 22 funds in the US Thematic Category.

  1. Rank 1ALRNDNYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2ATECBiShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 3BLOHARoundhill HALO ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BHOMZHoya Capital Housing ETFScore 64
  5. Rank 11CBAYCorgi Bay Area Based ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 11CEYESCorgi Data & Surveillance ETFScore 40
  7. Rank 11CNYNYCorgi NYC Based ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

EYESCCorgi Data & Surveillance ETF

LOHABRoundhill HALO ETF

In short

EYES A 2026-vintage take on the data and surveillance theme, priced at 0.35% while the typical US thematic fund charges well more. Small, new, and still writing its record.

LOHA No data

Stated mandate

EYES The Fund seeks capital appreciation.

LOHA No data

Why people hold it

  • EYES At 0.35%, it undercuts the median fee in its US thematic peer group and lands below rivals like THRO (0.57%) and VRAI (0.55%).
  • The mandate is plain English: an equity fund seeking capital appreciation. One job, one asset class, nothing exotic bolted on.
  • Return comes through share price, not payouts. The fund has not been distributing income, so the theme itself does the work.

LOHA No data

Worth knowing

  • EYES It launched in 2026, so the history is short and the usual risk statistics rest on limited data.
  • Small asset base and thin trading. Spreads can run wider than in the cohort's heavyweights, and size matters most on large orders.
  • Cheap for a theme fund, not cheap outright: LRND asks 0.14% for a broader US R&D leaders mandate.

LOHA No data

Full EYES profile⁠

Full LOHA profile⁠

EYES vs LOHA Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

EYES vs LOHA Cost

Same expense ratio

$7,126

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • EYES 0.35%

    $7,126

  • LOHA 0.35%

    $7,126

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • EYES 0.35%
  • LOHA 0.35%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530EYES $7,126LOHA $7,126

Year by year

YearEYESLOHA
10$634$634
20$2,454$2,454
30$7,126$7,126

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%EYES
  • 0.35%LOHA
  • Middle half of US Thematic funds
  • Median 0.35%

EYES 7th cheapest of 22 funds

LOHA 7th cheapest of 22 funds

EYES vs LOHA Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
EYES None
LOHA None

Distribution history

EYESAll EYES payments⁠

No distribution history available.

LOHAAll LOHA payments⁠

No distribution history available.

EYES vs LOHA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
EYES 5.14LOHA −0.29

Popular comparisons

  • EYESCvsLRNDA

    Corgi Data & Surveillance ETF · NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.14%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LOHABvsLRNDA

    Roundhill HALO ETF · NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.14%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • EYESCvsTECBA

    Corgi Data & Surveillance ETF · iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LOHABvsTECBA

    Roundhill HALO ETF · iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • EYESCvsHOMZB

    Corgi Data & Surveillance ETF · Hoya Capital Housing ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LOHABvsHOMZB

    Roundhill HALO ETF · Hoya Capital Housing ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.