TENJ ranks 3rd and FAPR 44th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
FAPR vs TENJ
0.0%by weight
TENJ −0.32pt a year
0.85%0.53%
TENJ 1.1×the volume
22.2K24.6K
FAPR vs TENJ Performance
+9.0%+11.7%
- FAPR 0.85%
- TENJ 0.53%, better
- FAPR $1.35B
- TENJ $47M
- FAPR +9.0%
- TENJ +11.7%, better
- FAPR 3
- TENJ 4
- FAPR 22.2K sh
- TENJ 24.6K sh, better
- FAPR $47.69
- TENJ $28.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FAPR | TENJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | A86Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A70Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | A73Higher | B66 |
| Holdings | B64Higher | C51 |
| Durability | A82Higher | C41 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. FAPR and TENJ are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FAPRC
TENJB
In short
FAPR One of twelve First Trust buffer funds, each keyed to a different start month. The April vintage uses SPY options to absorb the first 10% of a decline over its one-year outcome period, trading that cushion for a ceiling on gains that resets every April.
Stated mandate
FAPR The Fund seeks to track the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust, subject to a 15.16% upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses during the current outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FAPR vs TENJ Holdings
How FAPR and TENJ differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of FAPR and 0.0% of TENJ.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for TENJ.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in FAPRMore in TENJ | FAPR | TENJ |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | TENJ +0.1 points | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | FAPR +0.1 points | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- FAPR102.5%
- TENJ102.6%
- FAPR2
- TENJ2
Asset class
- FAPR
- Multi-Asset
- TENJ
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in FAPR2
- In both0
- Only in TENJ2
Only in FAPR
2 securities, 100% of FAPR by weight
- 2027-04-16 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 7.1099.56%
- 2027-04-16 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 710.142.26%
Only in TENJ
2 securities, 100% of TENJ by weight
- Ishares Core S&P Etf Trust97.64%
- JUL27 Ivv Us P @ 748.894.03%
Weight gaps
FAPR and TENJ share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FAPR vs TENJ Cost
Overpaying FAPR vs TENJ
$5,663
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FAPR 0.85%
$16,199
TENJ 0.53%
$10,536
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FAPR | TENJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $953 | $555 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $3,658 | $2,048 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $10,536 | $5,663 |
- 0.85%FAPR
- 0.53%TENJ, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
TENJ 11th cheapest of 77 funds
FAPR 60th cheapest of 77 funds
FAPR vs TENJ Dividends
- FAPR None
- TENJ
- FAPR
- TENJ $0.07
- FAPR
- TENJ Dec 23, 2025
- FAPR
- TENJ Dec 29, 2025
- FAPR
- TENJ Irregular
Distribution history
FAPR vs TENJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FAPR 5.6%TENJ 8.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- FAPR 1.67TENJ 0.90
- Worst fall
- FAPR −16.0%TENJ −5.5%
- Market sensitivity
- FAPR 0.38TENJ 0.63
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.