XLC ranks 1st and FCOM 2nd of 9 funds in the Communication Services (Broad) Category.
FCOM vs XLC
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.08%0.08%
XLC 21.5×the volume
277K5.97M
XLC +0.8pt
+4.8%+5.6%
FCOM vs XLC Performance
+26.5%+31.1%
- FCOM 0.08%
- XLC 0.08%
- FCOM $1.78B
- XLC $21.8B
- FCOM −7.6%, better
- XLC −11.9%
- FCOM 1.05%
- XLC 1.38%, better
- FCOM 91
- XLC 24
- FCOM 277K sh
- XLC 5.97M sh, better
- FCOM $64.65
- XLC $101.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FCOM | XLC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A90 | A90 |
| Mission | A88 | |
| Risk | C49 | C49 |
| Tradability | B66 | A95Higher |
| Holdings | C47Higher | C44 |
| Durability | B65 | A77Higher |
Rank among Communication Services (Broad) funds
Same Category. FCOM and XLC are both graded against the same 9 Communication Services (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FCOMB
XLCA
In short
FCOM Communication services without the mega-cap chokehold: FCOM tracks an MSCI index that reaches past the giants into mid and small caps, with 25/50 caps on the biggest names, for 0.08% a year.
XLC Launched in 2018, XLC bottles the communication services corner of the S&P 500: search, social, streaming and the phone companies, in one 0.08% wrapper that trades heavily all day.
Stated mandate
FCOM The fund seeks to track the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Communication Services 25/50 Index.
XLC The fund seeks to track, before expenses, the price and yield performance of the Communication Services Select Sector Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FCOM vs XLC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FCOM vs XLC Cost
Overpaying FCOM vs XLC
$84
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FCOM 0.084%
$1,773
XLC 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FCOM | XLC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $154 | $147 | $7 |
| 20 | $603 | $575 | $28 |
| 30 | $1,773 | $1,689 | $84 |
- 0.08%FCOM
- 0.08%XLC
- Middle half of Communication Services (Broad) funds
- Median 0.35%
XLC cheapest of 9 funds
FCOM 2nd cheapest of 9 funds
FCOM vs XLC Dividends
- FCOM 1.05%
- XLC 1.38%, better
- FCOM $0.68
- XLC $1.38
- FCOM $0.18
- XLC $0.36
- FCOM Sep 18, 2026
- XLC Sep 21, 2026
- FCOM Sep 22, 2026
- XLC Sep 23, 2026
- FCOM Quarterly
- XLC Quarterly
Distribution history
FCOM vs XLC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FCOM
- XLC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FCOM 16.3%XLC 15.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FCOM 0.91, betterXLC 0.82
- Worst fall
- FCOM −44.6%XLC −43.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FCOM 1.05XLC 0.85
FCOM and XLC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





