FCOM ranks 2nd and XTL 5th of 9 funds in the Communication Services (Broad) Category.
FCOM vs XTL
FCOM −0.27pt a year
0.08%0.35%
FCOM 5.5×the volume
282K51.6K
XTL +1.3pt
+10.9%+12.2%
FCOM vs XTL Performance
+32.2%+88.6%
- FCOM 0.08%, better
- XTL 0.35%
- FCOM $1.51B
- XTL $382M
- FCOM +0.7%
- XTL +28.7%, better
- FCOM 0.99%
- XTL 1.04%, better
- FCOM 92
- XTL 40
- FCOM 282K sh, better
- XTL 51.6K sh
- FCOM $68.68
- XTL $175.52
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FCOM | XTL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A90Higher | C47 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C49Higher | D36 |
| Tradability | B66Higher | B55 |
| Holdings | C48 | A85Higher |
| Durability | B65Higher | B60 |
Rank among Communication Services (Broad) funds
Same Category. FCOM and XTL are both graded against the same 9 Communication Services (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FCOMB
XTLC
In short
FCOM Communication services without the mega-cap chokehold: FCOM tracks an MSCI index that reaches past the giants into mid and small caps, with 25/50 caps on the biggest names, for 0.08% a year.
XTL Telecom, not "communication services." XTL's index sticks to carriers and the equipment makers behind them, and weights them close to equally, so a small-cap gear supplier can count for as much as a national wireless giant.
Stated mandate
FCOM The fund seeks to track the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Communication Services 25/50 Index.
XTL The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return performance of the S&P Telecom Select Industry Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FCOM vs XTL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FCOM vs XTL Cost
Overpaying XTL vs FCOM
$5,353
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FCOM 0.084%
$1,773
XTL 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FCOM | XTL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $154 | $634 | $480 |
| 20 | $603 | $2,454 | $1,851 |
| 30 | $1,773 | $7,126 | $5,353 |
- 0.08%FCOM, cheaper
- 0.35%XTL
- Middle half of Communication Services (Broad) funds
- Median 0.35%
FCOM 2nd cheapest of 9 funds
XTL 5th cheapest of 9 funds
FCOM vs XTL Dividends
- FCOM 0.99%
- XTL 1.04%, better
- FCOM $0.68
- XTL $1.93
- FCOM $0.18
- XTL $0.30
- FCOM Sep 18, 2026
- XTL Sep 21, 2026
- FCOM Sep 22, 2026
- XTL Sep 23, 2026
- FCOM Quarterly
- XTL Quarterly
Distribution history
FCOM vs XTL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FCOM
- XTL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FCOM 16.3%, betterXTL 25.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- FCOM 0.91XTL 1.37, better
- Worst fall
- FCOM −44.4%XTL −36.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FCOM 1.09XTL 1.22
FCOM and XTL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
