GIGB ranks 4th and FCOR 29th of 49 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate Category.
FCOR vs GIGB
GIGB −0.28pt a year
0.36%0.08%
GIGB 1.7×the volume
50.2K83.7K
FCOR +0.2pt
0.0%−0.2%
FCOR vs GIGB Performance
0.0%−0.8%
- FCOR 0.36%
- GIGB 0.08%, better
- FCOR $341M
- GIGB $1.04B
- FCOR −1.0%
- GIGB −0.5%, better
- FCOR 4.84%, better
- GIGB 4.77%
- FCOR 579
- GIGB 2719
- FCOR 50.2K sh
- GIGB 83.7K sh, better
- FCOR $45.33
- GIGB $44.25
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FCOR | GIGB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D29 | A94Higher |
| Mission | A94 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D35 | C54Higher |
| Tradability | B55Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | B59 | A87Higher |
| Durability | B67 | A74Higher |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate funds
Same Category. FCOR and GIGB are both graded against the same 49 Investment Grade Corporate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FCORC
GIGBA
In short
FCOR Fidelity's in-house take on corporate credit: roughly 400 investment-grade corporate bonds picked without a declared index to follow, with income paid out monthly. The trade-off is price, in a category where the index giants charge pennies.
GIGB Most investment-grade corporate bond funds just buy the biggest borrowers. Goldman's index screens the market on liquidity and fundamentals first, then spreads the money across roughly 1,600 bonds for 0.08% a year.
Stated mandate
FCOR The fund seeks a high level of current income and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in investment-grade corporate bonds and related corporate debt securities.
GIGB The Fund seeks to track the FTSE Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index, which measures U.S.-dollar-denominated investment-grade corporate bonds meeting liquidity and fundamental screening criteria.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FCOR vs GIGB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FCOR vs GIGB Cost
Overpaying FCOR vs GIGB
$5,631
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FCOR 0.36%
$7,320
GIGB 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FCOR | GIGB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $652 | $147 | $505 |
| 20 | $2,522 | $575 | $1,947 |
| 30 | $7,320 | $1,689 | $5,631 |
- 0.36%FCOR
- 0.08%GIGB, cheaper
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate funds
- Median 0.25%
GIGB 4th cheapest of 49 funds
FCOR 36th cheapest of 49 funds
FCOR vs GIGB Dividends
- FCOR 4.84%, better
- GIGB 4.77%
- FCOR $2.19
- GIGB $2.12
- FCOR $0.19
- GIGB $0.18
- FCOR Oct 29, 2026
- GIGB Oct 1, 2026
- FCOR Pays Nov 2, 2026
- GIGB Oct 7, 2026
- FCOR Monthly
- GIGB Monthly
Distribution history
FCOR vs GIGB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FCOR
- GIGB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FCOR 6.4%, betterGIGB 6.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- FCOR 0.35, betterGIGB 0.30
- Worst fall
- FCOR −22.2%GIGB −21.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FCOR 1.11GIGB 1.04
Popular comparisons
- 0.36% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.