ILCV ranks 2nd and FCTR 98th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
FCTR vs ILCV
ILCV −0.61pt a year
0.65%0.04%
ILCV 12.6×the volume
1.93K24.4K
ILCV +12.9pt
−0.3%+12.6%
FCTR vs ILCV Performance
−1.4%+81.1%
- FCTR 0.65%
- ILCV 0.04%, better
- FCTR $47M
- ILCV $1.37B
- FCTR −7.8%
- ILCV +21.0%, better
- FCTR 0.62%
- ILCV 1.51%, better
- FCTR 144
- ILCV 375
- FCTR 1.93K sh
- ILCV 24.4K sh, better
- FCTR $33.59
- ILCV $109.27
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FCTR | ILCV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F7 | A99Higher |
| Mission | F19 | A82Higher |
| Risk | F10 | A90Higher |
| Tradability | F20 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | B60Higher | D39 |
| Durability | D32 | A82Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. FCTR and ILCV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FCTRF
ILCVA
In short
FCTR Most multifactor ETFs blend value, momentum, quality and low volatility all at once. FCTR ranks them instead and rotates toward whichever are winning on relative strength. A factor market-timer in a category built on holding everything.
ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.
Stated mandate
FCTR The Fund aims to outperform the large- and mid-capitalization U.S. equity market before fees and expenses by investing primarily in U.S.-listed large- and mid-capitalization stocks selected through a proprietary factor-rotation model.
ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FCTR vs ILCV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FCTR vs ILCV Cost
Overpaying FCTR vs ILCV
$11,868
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FCTR 0.65%
$12,717
ILCV 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FCTR | ILCV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $73 | $1,090 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $288 | $4,152 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $849 | $11,868 |
- 0.65%FCTR
- 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
ILCV cheapest of 99 funds
FCTR 91st cheapest of 99 funds
FCTR vs ILCV Dividends
- FCTR 0.62%
- ILCV 1.51%, better
- FCTR $0.21
- ILCV $1.65
- FCTR $0.06
- ILCV $0.42
- FCTR Sep 24, 2026
- ILCV Sep 15, 2026
- FCTR Sep 30, 2026
- ILCV Sep 18, 2026
- FCTR Quarterly
- ILCV Quarterly
Distribution history
FCTR vs ILCV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FCTR
- ILCV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FCTR 18.1%ILCV 10.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FCTR 0.57ILCV 1.57, better
- Worst fall
- FCTR −37.1%ILCV −18.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FCTR 1.04ILCV 0.82
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.