VYM ranks 2nd and FCTR 98th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
FCTR vs VYM
VYM −0.61pt a year
0.65%0.04%
VYM 591.9×the volume
1.93K1.14M
VYM +12.1pt
−0.3%+11.8%
FCTR vs VYM Performance
−1.4%+74.3%
- FCTR 0.65%
- VYM 0.04%, better
- FCTR $47M
- VYM $95.8B
- FCTR −7.8%
- VYM +19.3%, better
- FCTR 0.62%
- VYM 2.24%, better
- FCTR 144
- VYM 601
- FCTR 1.93K sh
- VYM 1.14M sh, better
- FCTR $33.59
- VYM $163.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FCTR | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F7 | A99Higher |
| Mission | F19 | A79Higher |
| Risk | F10 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | F20 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | B60Higher | C53 |
| Durability | D32 | A95Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. FCTR and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FCTRF
VYMA
In short
FCTR Most multifactor ETFs blend value, momentum, quality and low volatility all at once. FCTR ranks them instead and rotates toward whichever are winning on relative strength. A factor market-timer in a category built on holding everything.
VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.
Stated mandate
FCTR The Fund aims to outperform the large- and mid-capitalization U.S. equity market before fees and expenses by investing primarily in U.S.-listed large- and mid-capitalization stocks selected through a proprietary factor-rotation model.
VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FCTR vs VYM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FCTR vs VYM Cost
Overpaying FCTR vs VYM
$11,868
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FCTR 0.65%
$12,717
VYM 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FCTR | VYM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $73 | $1,090 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $288 | $4,152 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $849 | $11,868 |
- 0.65%FCTR
- 0.04%VYM, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VYM cheapest of 99 funds
FCTR 91st cheapest of 99 funds
FCTR vs VYM Dividends
- FCTR 0.62%
- VYM 2.24%, better
- FCTR $0.21
- VYM $3.68
- FCTR $0.06
- VYM $0.89
- FCTR Sep 24, 2026
- VYM Sep 18, 2026
- FCTR Sep 30, 2026
- VYM Sep 22, 2026
- FCTR Quarterly
- VYM Quarterly
Distribution history
FCTR vs VYM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FCTR
- VYM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FCTR 18.1%VYM 11.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FCTR 0.57VYM 1.38, better
- Worst fall
- FCTR −37.1%VYM −15.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FCTR 1.04VYM 0.75
FCTR and VYM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



