Skip to content

FCTR vs VYM

First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF

FCTRFCboe

Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

VYMANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

VYM −0.61pt a year

FCTR0.65%VYM0.04%

Avg volume · 30D

VYM 591.9×the volume

FCTR1.93KVYM1.14M

5Y return · a year

VYM +12.1pt

FCTR−0.3%VYM+11.8%

FCTR vs VYM Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

−1.4%FCTR+74.3%VYM

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. FCTR −1.4%. VYM +74.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−40%−20%20%40%60%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FCTR 0.65%
VYM 0.04%, better
Fund size
FCTR $47M
VYM $95.8B
1Y total return
FCTR −7.8%
VYM +19.3%, better
Yield (12M)
FCTR 0.62%
VYM 2.24%, better
Holdings
FCTR 144
VYM 601
Avg volume (30D)
FCTR 1.93K sh
VYM 1.14M sh, better
NAV per share
FCTR $33.59
VYM $163.75
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FCTR: Cost 7, Risk 10, Mission 19, Tradability 20, Holdings 60, Durability 32. VYM: Cost 99, Risk 84, Mission 79, Tradability 61, Holdings 53, Durability 95.
Pillar letters and Scores for FCTR, VYM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFCTRVYM
Cost30% weightF7A99Higher
Mission25% weightF19A79Higher
Risk15% weightF10A84Higher
Tradability15% weightF20B61Higher
Holdings10% weightB60HigherC53
Durability5% weightD32A95Higher

Rank among US Multifactor funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FCTR and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Multifactor⁠

Category · 99 funds
See all 99 ›

VYM ranks 2nd and FCTR 98th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.

  1. Rank 1AVONVVanguard Russell 1000 Value ETFScore 85
  2. Rank 2AILCViShares Morningstar Value ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 2AVYMVanguard High Dividend Yield ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AIMCViShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 97FPAMCPacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETFScore 23
  6. Rank 98FFCTRFirst Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETFScore 19
  7. Rank 99FMBCEMonarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETFScore 18

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FCTRFFirst Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF

VYMAVanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

In short

FCTR Most multifactor ETFs blend value, momentum, quality and low volatility all at once. FCTR ranks them instead and rotates toward whichever are winning on relative strength. A factor market-timer in a category built on holding everything.

VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.

Stated mandate

FCTR The Fund aims to outperform the large- and mid-capitalization U.S. equity market before fees and expenses by investing primarily in U.S.-listed large- and mid-capitalization stocks selected through a proprietary factor-rotation model.

VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.

Why people hold it

  • FCTR The rotation is the whole product: value, momentum, quality and low volatility get scored on risk-adjusted relative strength, and exposure leans toward the leaders rather than averaging across all four.stockanalysis.com
  • Roughly 170 large- and mid-cap U.S. stocks sit underneath, so the basket still reads like a core equity sleeve even when the factor tilt swings. The holdings are the strongest part of the package.
  • Live since 2018, which means the rotation model has a real-world record through a full market cycle instead of a backtest.
  • The stated yardstick is candid: a custom 80% MSCI USA / 20% MSCI USA Minimum Volatility blend, not a flattering plain-vanilla comparison.
  • VYM Four basis points a year, against a peer-group median near 0.32%. Cheaper than cohort neighbors VONV (0.06%) and FNDX (0.25%).
  • Running since 2006 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, so ordinary orders tend to fill at tight spreads.
  • Simple mandate: track the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index of US common stocks screened on yield. No manager discretion, no options overlay, plain 1940-Act fund.vanguard.com
  • Pays quarterly, and among 100-plus value and multifactor rivals it stands as one of the strongest overall packages in the group.

Worth knowing

  • FCTR At 0.65% a year, it runs about double the typical U.S. multifactor ETF and several times cheaper index-based peers like FNDX (0.25%) or VONV (0.06%).
  • It trades lightly next to the giants in its category, so the bid/ask spread is a real part of the cost of getting in and out.
  • Rotation is a timing call by design. When factor leadership flips quickly, the model can be shifting into a factor as it cools rather than ahead of it.
  • VYM The screen is yield, not payout growth or dividend quality, so a company can qualify simply because its share price fell.
  • This is a value slice by design, tilted to established payers, so it behaves differently from a total US market fund.
  • Roughly 600 holdings, but weight leans toward the largest payers, so the top of the roster does more of the work than the count suggests.

Full FCTR profile⁠

Full VYM profile⁠

FCTR vs VYM Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FCTR vs VYM Cost

Overpaying FCTR vs VYM

$11,868

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FCTR 0.65%

    $12,717

  • VYM 0.04%

    $849

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FCTR 0.65%
  • VYM 0.04%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530FCTR $12,717VYM $849

Year by year

YearFCTRVYMOverpaying
10$1,163$73$1,090
20$4,440$288$4,152
30$12,717$849$11,868

Expense ratio

  • 0.65%FCTR
  • 0.04%VYM, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Multifactor funds
  • Median 0.29%

VYM cheapest of 99 funds

FCTR 91st cheapest of 99 funds

FCTR vs VYM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FCTR 0.62%
VYM 2.24%, better
Payout (12M)
FCTR $0.21
VYM $3.68
Last payment
FCTR $0.06
VYM $0.89
Ex-dividend
FCTR Sep 24, 2026
VYM Sep 18, 2026
Paid on
FCTR Sep 30, 2026
VYM Sep 22, 2026
Frequency
FCTR Quarterly
VYM Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FCTRQuarterly · 31 paymentsAll FCTR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 31 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Sep 14, 2018 $0.02; Dec 18, 2018 $0.09; Mar 21, 2019 $0.04; Jun 14, 2019 $0.05; Sep 25, 2019 $0.07; Dec 13, 2019 $0.07; Mar 26, 2020 $0.04; Jun 25, 2020 $0.06; Sep 24, 2020 $0.03; Mar 25, 2021 $0.07; Jun 24, 2021 $0.06; Sep 23, 2021 $0.02; Dec 23, 2021 $0.02; Mar 25, 2022 $0.08; Jun 24, 2022 $0.09; Sep 23, 2022 $0.14; Dec 23, 2022 $0.07; Mar 24, 2023 $0.07; Jun 27, 2023 $0.11; Sep 22, 2023 $0.02; Dec 22, 2023 $0.08; Mar 21, 2024 $0.04; Jun 27, 2024 $0.07; Sep 26, 2024 $0.07; Dec 13, 2024 $0.09; Mar 27, 2025 $0.03; Jun 26, 2025 $0.03; Sep 25, 2025 $0.05; Mar 26, 2026 $0.07; Jun 25, 2026 $0.08; Sep 24, 2026 $0.06. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
VYMQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll VYM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.56; Jun 23, 2017 $0.60; Sep 20, 2017 $0.60; Dec 21, 2017 $0.64; Mar 26, 2018 $0.61; Jun 22, 2018 $0.63; Sep 26, 2018 $0.67; Dec 24, 2018 $0.74; Mar 25, 2019 $0.65; Jun 17, 2019 $0.62; Sep 24, 2019 $0.79; Dec 23, 2019 $0.78; Mar 10, 2020 $0.55; Jun 22, 2020 $0.84; Sep 21, 2020 $0.71; Dec 21, 2020 $0.81; Mar 22, 2021 $0.66; Jun 21, 2021 $0.75; Sep 20, 2021 $0.75; Dec 20, 2021 $0.94; Mar 21, 2022 $0.66; Jun 21, 2022 $0.85; Sep 19, 2022 $0.77; Dec 19, 2022 $0.97; Mar 20, 2023 $0.72; Jun 20, 2023 $0.88; Sep 18, 2023 $0.78; Dec 18, 2023 $1.10; Mar 15, 2024 $0.66; Jun 21, 2024 $1.02; Sep 20, 2024 $0.85; Dec 20, 2024 $0.96; Mar 21, 2025 $0.85; Jun 20, 2025 $0.86; Sep 19, 2025 $0.84; Dec 19, 2025 $0.95; Mar 20, 2026 $0.86; Jun 18, 2026 $0.98; Sep 18, 2026 $0.89. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

FCTR vs VYM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FCTR
  • VYM
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: FCTR −37.1% · Oct 2023. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FCTR 18.1%VYM 11.1%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FCTR 0.57VYM 1.38, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FCTR −37.1%VYM −15.9%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FCTR 1.04VYM 0.75

FCTR and VYM in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FCTRFvsVONVA

    First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF · Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VYMAvsVONVA

    Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF · Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FCTRFvsILCVA

    First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VYMAvsILCVA

    Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FCTRFvsIMCVA

    First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VYMAvsIMCVA

    Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.