Skip to content
etf.net

FDAT vs UCBG

Tactical Advantage ETF

FDATDNYSE Arca

State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF

UCBGANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

UCBG −1.10pt a year

FDAT1.16%UCBG0.06%

Avg volume · 30D

UCBG 4659.2×the volume

FDAT891UCBG4.15M

FDAT vs UCBG Performance

Sep 30, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−1.2%FDAT−0.9%UCBG

Sep 30, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. FDAT −1.2%. UCBG −0.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%1%2%Sep 30Oct 15Oct 30
Expense ratio
FDAT 1.16%
UCBG 0.06%, better
Fund size
FDAT $36M
UCBG $2.52B
1Y total return
FDAT +2.4%
UCBG No data
Yield (12M)
FDAT 6.01%
UCBG No data
Holdings
FDAT 17
UCBG 868
Avg volume (30D)
FDAT 891 sh
UCBG 4.15M sh, better
NAV per share
FDAT $21.90
UCBG $50.56
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FDAT: Cost 6, Risk 50, Mission 70, Tradability 12, Holdings 44, Durability 27. UCBG: Cost 100, Risk not scored, Mission 99, Tradability 99, Holdings 79, Durability 66.
Pillar letters and Scores for FDAT, UCBG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFDATUCBG
Cost30% weightF6A100Higher
Mission25% weightA70A99Higher
Risk15% weightC50Not scored
Tradability15% weightF12A99Higher
Holdings10% weightC44A79Higher
Durability5% weightD27B66Higher

Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FDAT and UCBG are both graded against the same 37 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Multi-Asset Allocation⁠

Category · 37 funds
See all 37 ›

UCBG ranks 1st and FDAT 32nd of 37 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AUCBGState Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETFScore 95
  2. Rank 2AAOAiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETFScore 88
  3. Rank 31DBAMOBrookstone Opportunities ETFScore 35
  4. Rank 32DFDATTactical Advantage ETFScore 34
  5. Rank 33DQVOYQ3 All-Season Active Rotation ETFScore 32

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FDATDTactical Advantage ETF

UCBGAState Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF

In short

FDAT A fund-of-ETFs that treats cash as a real holding: when its model reads a downtrend, it trims US equity and high-yield bond ETFs and parks the difference. All-in cost is 1.16%.

UCBG No data

Stated mandate

FDAT The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation while attempting to keep the volatility of its returns below that of equity markets generally.

UCBG No data

Why people hold it

  • FDAT Cash is a position here, not a leftover. A forecast downtrend shifts assets out of equity and high-yield bond ETFs into cash and cash equivalents.sec.gov
  • Visible plumbing: it holds other US-listed equity and high-yield bond ETFs rather than a black box of derivatives, and it distributes quarterly.sec.gov
  • The mandate is written around volatility, not just gains: long-term capital appreciation while keeping return swings below equity markets generally.sec.gov

UCBG No data

Worth knowing

  • FDAT At 1.16% it sits above the allocation-fund median, and well above index-built peers like UCBG (0.06%) and IRTR (0.08%). That fee covers the ETFs it owns too.sec.gov
  • A small, thinly traded fund, so spreads and order size matter more than they do in the category's giants.
  • Moving to cash cuts both directions: less exposure in selloffs, less in rallies. The signal is proprietary, so the timing is not visible in advance.sec.gov

UCBG No data

Full FDAT profile⁠

Full UCBG profile⁠

FDAT vs UCBG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FDAT vs UCBG Cost

Overpaying FDAT vs UCBG

$19,962

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FDAT 1.16%

    $21,232

  • UCBG 0.06%

    $1,270

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FDAT 1.16%
  • UCBG 0.06%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K$25K051015202530FDAT $21,232UCBG $1,270

Year by year

YearFDATUCBGOverpaying
10$2,032$110$1,922
20$7,580$432$7,148
30$21,232$1,270$19,962

Expense ratio

  • 1.16%FDAT
  • 0.06%UCBG, cheaper
  • Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
  • Median 0.57%

UCBG cheapest of 37 funds

FDAT 35th cheapest of 37 funds

FDAT vs UCBG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FDAT 6.01%
UCBG No data
Payout (12M)
FDAT $1.32
UCBG No data
Last payment
FDAT $0.14
UCBG $0.04
Ex-dividend
FDAT Sep 24, 2026
UCBG Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
FDAT Sep 25, 2026
UCBG Sep 23, 2026
Frequency
FDAT Quarterly
UCBG Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

FDATQuarterly · 7 paymentsAll FDAT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 7 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2023 $0.33; Dec 18, 2024 $1.89; Sep 25, 2025 $0.13; Dec 23, 2025 $0.90; Mar 24, 2026 $0.21; Jun 23, 2026 $0.06; Sep 24, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$220232026YTD
UCBGIrregular · 1 paymentAll UCBG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Sep 21, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$220232026YTD

FDAT vs UCBG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FDAT 8.5%UCBG No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FDAT 0.66UCBG No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FDAT −8.1%since Apr 2023UCBG No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FDAT 0.76UCBG 0.00

FDAT and UCBG in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • FDATDvsAOAA

    Tactical Advantage ETF · iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.16% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • UCBGAvsAOAA

    State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF · iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • FDATDvsIRTRA

    Tactical Advantage ETF · iShares LifePath Retirement ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.16% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • UCBGAvsIRTRA

    State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF · iShares LifePath Retirement ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • FDATDvsINCEA

    Tactical Advantage ETF · Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.16% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • UCBGAvsINCEA

    State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF · Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.