INCE ranks 4th and FDAT 32nd of 37 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.
FDAT vs INCE
INCE −0.87pt a year
1.16%0.29%
INCE 53.1×the volume
89147.3K
INCE +8.9pt
+10.2%+19.1%
FDAT vs INCE Performance
+2.4%+22.6%
- FDAT 1.16%
- INCE 0.29%, better
- FDAT $36M
- INCE $368M
- FDAT +2.4%
- INCE +22.6%, better
- FDAT 6.01%, better
- INCE 5.28%
- FDAT 17
- INCE 112
- FDAT 891 sh
- INCE 47.3K sh, better
- FDAT $21.90
- INCE $68.80
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FDAT | INCE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F6 | A82Higher |
| Mission | A70 | |
| Risk | C50 | B64Higher |
| Tradability | F12 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | C44 | A74Higher |
| Durability | D27 | A85Higher |
Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds
Same Category. FDAT and INCE are both graded against the same 37 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FDATD
INCEA
In short
FDAT A fund-of-ETFs that treats cash as a real holding: when its model reads a downtrend, it trims US equity and high-yield bond ETFs and parks the difference. All-in cost is 1.16%.
INCE Franklin's income playbook run through stocks instead of bonds: roughly 100 equity-focused positions, monthly payouts, and an objective that targets lower volatility than the S&P 500, at a fee well under the typical allocation fund.
Stated mandate
FDAT The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation while attempting to keep the volatility of its returns below that of equity markets generally.
INCE The Fund seeks income from equity securities and related instruments while also pursuing capital appreciation and lower volatility than the S&P 500 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FDAT vs INCE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FDAT vs INCE Cost
Overpaying FDAT vs INCE
$15,280
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FDAT 1.16%
$21,232
INCE 0.29%
$5,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FDAT | INCE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,032 | $527 | $1,505 |
| 20 | $7,580 | $2,044 | $5,536 |
| 30 | $21,232 | $5,952 | $15,280 |
- 1.16%FDAT
- 0.29%INCE, cheaper
- Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
- Median 0.57%
INCE 7th cheapest of 37 funds
FDAT 35th cheapest of 37 funds
FDAT vs INCE Dividends
- FDAT 6.01%, better
- INCE 5.28%
- FDAT $1.32
- INCE $3.64
- FDAT $0.14
- INCE $0.30
- FDAT Sep 24, 2026
- INCE Oct 30, 2026
- FDAT Sep 25, 2026
- INCE Pays Nov 4, 2026
- FDAT Quarterly
- INCE Monthly
Distribution history
FDAT vs INCE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FDAT 8.5%, betterINCE 10.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- FDAT 0.66INCE 1.28, better
- Worst fall
- FDAT −8.1%INCE −18.4%
- Market sensitivity
- FDAT 0.76INCE 0.60
Popular comparisons
- 1.16% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.16% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.16% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.