FDEM ranks 3rd and ROAM 8th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
FDEM vs ROAM
FDEM −0.19pt a year
0.25%0.44%
FDEM 4.9×the volume
87.5K17.9K
ROAM +2.1pt
+9.3%+11.4%
FDEM vs ROAM Performance
+55.9%+71.5%
- FDEM 0.25%, better
- ROAM 0.44%
- FDEM $591M
- ROAM $102M
- FDEM +12.2%
- ROAM +19.6%, better
- FDEM 3.49%, better
- ROAM 2.50%
- FDEM 229
- ROAM 349
- FDEM 87.5K sh, better
- ROAM 17.9K sh
- FDEM $33.73
- ROAM $33.97
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FDEM | ROAM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | C53 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B56 | A78Higher |
| Tradability | B65Higher | C43 |
| Holdings | C42 | A88Higher |
| Durability | B65Higher | C46 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. FDEM and ROAM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FDEMA
ROAMB
In short
FDEM Value, quality, momentum and low-volatility screens run across emerging markets stocks, plus an unusual extra filter: a tilt toward names less correlated with US equities. Fidelity's in-house index, priced under the category median.
ROAM Emerging markets, rebuilt by rulebook: ROAM's index screens roughly 300 stocks for value, quality and momentum, and is built to balance risk against return instead of letting the biggest markets set the agenda.
Stated mandate
FDEM The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor Index.
ROAM The Fund seeks to track the total return of the Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity Index, a rules-based emerging-markets equity index designed to balance risk and return while emphasizing favorable factor characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FDEM vs ROAM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FDEM vs ROAM Cost
Overpaying ROAM vs FDEM
$3,693
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FDEM 0.25%
$5,159
ROAM 0.44%
$8,852
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FDEM | ROAM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $794 | $339 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $3,061 | $1,292 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $8,852 | $3,693 |
- 0.25%FDEM, cheaper
- 0.44%ROAM
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
FDEM 2nd cheapest of 20 funds
ROAM 10th cheapest of 20 funds
FDEM vs ROAM Dividends
- FDEM 3.49%, better
- ROAM 2.50%
- FDEM $1.17
- ROAM $0.84
- FDEM $0.38
- ROAM $0.33
- FDEM Sep 18, 2026
- ROAM Jun 25, 2026
- FDEM Sep 22, 2026
- ROAM Jun 29, 2026
- FDEM Quarterly
- ROAM Twice a year
Distribution history
FDEM vs ROAM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FDEM
- ROAM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FDEM 13.8%, betterROAM 14.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- FDEM 1.08ROAM 1.21, better
- Worst fall
- FDEM −24.2%, betterROAM −26.1%
- Market sensitivity
- FDEM 0.98ROAM 1.01
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.