EMGF ranks 1st and FDEM 3rd of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
EMGF vs FDEM
FDEM −0.01pt a year
0.26%0.25%
EMGF 1.8×the volume
156K87.5K
FDEM +0.3pt
+9.0%+9.3%
EMGF vs FDEM Performance
+53.9%+55.9%
- EMGF 0.26%
- FDEM 0.25%, better
- EMGF $1.79B
- FDEM $591M
- EMGF +14.5%, better
- FDEM +12.2%
- EMGF 2.19%
- FDEM 3.49%, better
- EMGF 740
- FDEM 229
- EMGF 156K sh, better
- FDEM 87.5K sh
- EMGF $65.41
- FDEM $33.73
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EMGF | FDEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92 | A92 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C43 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | A94Higher | B65 |
| Holdings | C48Higher | C42 |
| Durability | A89Higher | B65 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. EMGF and FDEM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EMGFA
FDEMA
In short
EMGF Emerging markets, sorted by factor screen instead of straight market cap. EMGF holds roughly 700 large- and mid-cap EM stocks picked for style-factor exposure, and charges 0.26% doing it, about half the multifactor EM norm.
FDEM Value, quality, momentum and low-volatility screens run across emerging markets stocks, plus an unusual extra filter: a tilt toward names less correlated with US equities. Fidelity's in-house index, priced under the category median.
Stated mandate
EMGF EMGF seeks to follow an index of large- and mid-capitalization emerging-market stocks selected for favorable exposure to specified style factors, subject to constraints.
FDEM The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EMGF vs FDEM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EMGF vs FDEM Cost
Overpaying EMGF vs FDEM
$199
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EMGF 0.26%
$5,358
FDEM 0.25%
$5,159
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EMGF | FDEM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $473 | $455 | $18 |
| 20 | $1,838 | $1,769 | $69 |
| 30 | $5,358 | $5,159 | $199 |
- 0.26%EMGF
- 0.25%FDEM, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
FDEM 2nd cheapest of 20 funds
EMGF 3rd cheapest of 20 funds
EMGF vs FDEM Dividends
- EMGF 2.19%
- FDEM 3.49%, better
- EMGF $1.44
- FDEM $1.17
- EMGF $0.61
- FDEM $0.38
- EMGF Jun 15, 2026
- FDEM Sep 18, 2026
- EMGF Jun 18, 2026
- FDEM Sep 22, 2026
- EMGF Twice a year
- FDEM Quarterly
Distribution history
EMGF vs FDEM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EMGF
- FDEM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EMGF 16.3%FDEM 13.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EMGF 1.09, betterFDEM 1.08
- Worst fall
- EMGF −27.1%FDEM −24.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EMGF 1.02FDEM 0.98
Popular comparisons
- 0.26% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.43%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.43%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.