KBE ranks 2nd and FDIQ 6th of 9 funds in the Banks Category.
FDIQ vs KBE
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.35%0.35%
KBE 472.0×the volume
3.39K1.6M
FDIQ vs KBE Performance
+5.4%−5.1%
- FDIQ 0.35%
- KBE 0.35%
- FDIQ $43M
- KBE $1.54B
- FDIQ
- KBE +18.5%
- FDIQ 1.99%
- KBE 2.24%, better
- FDIQ 34
- KBE 109
- FDIQ 3.39K sh
- KBE 1.6M sh, better
- FDIQ $75.01
- KBE $66.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FDIQ | KBE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B62 | B62 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B63Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | F12 | B68Higher |
| Holdings | C54 | A86Higher |
| Durability | C49 | A76Higher |
Rank among Banks funds
Same Category. FDIQ and KBE are both graded against the same 9 Banks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FDIQC
KBEB
In short
FDIQ Most financials ETFs buy lenders. FDIQ buys the companies that sell finance its data, a rules-based basket of roughly 30 financial data providers drawn from a Bloomberg index. Picks and shovels, not balance sheets.
KBE One of the original bank ETFs, running since 2005. It holds roughly 100 US banks in one ticker, spanning the whole bank segment of the market rather than a shortlist of household-name giants.
Stated mandate
FDIQ The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the investment results of the Bloomberg Financial Data Providers Index. It generally invests at least 90% of its total assets in securities comprising that index.
KBE The fund seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the total return of the S&P Banks Select Industry Index and provides targeted exposure to the bank segment of the S&P Total Market Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FDIQ vs KBE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FDIQ vs KBE Cost
Same expense ratio
$7,126
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FDIQ 0.35%
$7,126
KBE 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FDIQ | KBE |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $634 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $2,454 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $7,126 |
- 0.35%FDIQ
- 0.35%KBE
- Middle half of Banks funds
- Median 0.35%
FDIQ 2nd cheapest of 9 funds
KBE 2nd cheapest of 9 funds
FDIQ vs KBE Dividends
- FDIQ 1.99%
- KBE 2.24%, better
- FDIQ $1.49
- KBE $1.47
- FDIQ $0.37
- KBE $0.38
- FDIQ Sep 21, 2026
- KBE Sep 21, 2026
- FDIQ Sep 25, 2026
- KBE Sep 23, 2026
- FDIQ Quarterly
- KBE Quarterly
Distribution history
FDIQ vs KBE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FDIQ KBE 22.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- FDIQ KBE 0.96
- Worst fall
- FDIQ KBE −45.3%
- Market sensitivity
- FDIQ 1.20KBE 1.12
FDIQ and KBE in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



