ILCV ranks 2nd and FDLS 93rd of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
FDLS vs ILCV
ILCV −0.62pt a year
0.66%0.04%
FDLS 1.3×the volume
30.5K24.4K
ILCV +0.8pt
+21.8%+22.6%
FDLS vs ILCV Performance
+20.0%+21.0%
- FDLS 0.66%
- ILCV 0.04%, better
- FDLS $259M
- ILCV $1.37B
- FDLS +20.0%
- ILCV +21.0%, better
- FDLS 0.85%
- ILCV 1.51%, better
- FDLS 102
- ILCV 375
- FDLS 30.5K sh, better
- ILCV 24.4K sh
- FDLS $41.98
- ILCV $109.27
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FDLS | ILCV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F7 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A82 | |
| Risk | C41 | A90Higher |
| Tradability | D32 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | A70Higher | D39 |
| Durability | D39 | A82Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. FDLS and ILCV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FDLSD
ILCVA
In short
FDLS A multi-cap, multi-factor index fund from a boutique shop, priced at 0.66% a year. Launched in 2022, it fishes across the whole size ladder rather than parking in mega-caps like most factor funds do.
ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.
Stated mandate
FDLS The Fund seeks its investment objective through a policy requiring, under normal market conditions, that at least 80% of net assets be invested directly or indirectly in specified investments.
ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FDLS vs ILCV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FDLS vs ILCV Cost
Overpaying FDLS vs ILCV
$12,047
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FDLS 0.66%
$12,896
ILCV 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FDLS | ILCV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,180 | $73 | $1,107 |
| 20 | $4,504 | $288 | $4,216 |
| 30 | $12,896 | $849 | $12,047 |
- 0.66%FDLS
- 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
ILCV cheapest of 99 funds
FDLS 94th cheapest of 99 funds
FDLS vs ILCV Dividends
- FDLS 0.85%
- ILCV 1.51%, better
- FDLS $0.35
- ILCV $1.65
- FDLS $0.07
- ILCV $0.42
- FDLS Sep 25, 2026
- ILCV Sep 15, 2026
- FDLS Oct 1, 2026
- ILCV Sep 18, 2026
- FDLS Quarterly
- ILCV Quarterly
Distribution history
FDLS vs ILCV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FDLS 16.4%ILCV 10.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FDLS 1.02ILCV 1.57, better
- Worst fall
- FDLS −23.3%ILCV −18.6%
- Market sensitivity
- FDLS 1.08ILCV 0.82
Popular comparisons
- 0.66% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.