USCA ranks 2nd and FDMO 13th of 30 funds in the US Factor Index Category.
FDMO vs USCA
USCA −0.08pt a year
0.15%0.07%
USCA 1.5×the volume
66.6K97.9K
FDMO +3.9pt
+24.4%+20.5%
FDMO vs USCA Performance
+4.8%+7.7%
- FDMO 0.15%
- USCA 0.07%, better
- FDMO $870M
- USCA $3.42B
- FDMO +4.8%
- USCA +7.7%, better
- FDMO 0.66%
- USCA 1.05%, better
- FDMO 135
- USCA 392
- FDMO 66.6K sh
- USCA 97.9K sh, better
- FDMO $89.93
- USCA $44.82
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FDMO | USCA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A81 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A91 | |
| Risk | D38 | C54Higher |
| Tradability | C43 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | D39Higher | D29 |
| Durability | B59Higher | C49 |
Rank among US Factor Index funds
Same Category. FDMO and USCA are both graded against the same 30 US Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FDMOB
USCAA
In short
FDMO Momentum, house-built. FDMO tracks Fidelity's own US momentum index (about 130 stocks with the wind at their back) for 0.15% a year, roughly half what the typical US factor ETF charges.
USCA The largest US ETF debut on record when it launched in 2023, seeded by a Finnish pension fund. It owns roughly 400 US large- and mid-caps, keeping only the top half of each sector on MSCI's climate-transition scoring, for 0.07% a year.
Stated mandate
FDMO The fund seeks returns that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the Fidelity U.S. Momentum Factor Index.
USCA The fund seeks to track the MSCI USA Climate Action Index before fees and expenses through a passive indexing strategy. The index selects U.S. large- and mid-capitalization companies assessed as leading sector peers in climate-transition positioning and actions.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FDMO vs USCA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FDMO vs USCA Cost
Overpaying FDMO vs USCA
$1,657
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FDMO 0.15%
$3,137
USCA 0.07%
$1,480
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FDMO | USCA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $128 | $146 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $503 | $568 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $1,480 | $1,657 |
- 0.15%FDMO
- 0.07%USCA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Factor Index funds
- Median 0.30%
USCA 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
FDMO 5th cheapest of 30 funds
FDMO vs USCA Dividends
- FDMO 0.66%
- USCA 1.05%, better
- FDMO $0.59
- USCA $0.47
- FDMO $0.17
- USCA $0.10
- FDMO Sep 18, 2026
- USCA Sep 18, 2026
- FDMO Sep 22, 2026
- USCA Sep 25, 2026
- FDMO Quarterly
- USCA Quarterly
Distribution history
FDMO vs USCA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FDMO 16.3%USCA 12.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FDMO 1.26USCA 1.27, better
- Worst fall
- FDMO −25.4%USCA −19.2%
- Market sensitivity
- FDMO 1.06USCA 1.00
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.