LRND ranks 1st and FDN 6th of 22 funds in the US Thematic Category.
FDN vs LRND
LRND −0.35pt a year
0.49%0.14%
FDN 5.4×the volume
230K42.7K
LRND +3.0pt
+20.3%+23.3%
FDN vs LRND Performance
−6.2%+9.0%
- FDN 0.49%
- LRND 0.14%, better
- FDN $4.8B
- LRND $456M
- FDN −6.2%
- LRND +9.0%, better
- FDN 0.00%
- LRND 0.34%, better
- FDN 42
- LRND 110
- FDN 230K sh, better
- LRND 42.7K sh
- FDN $266.42
- LRND $44.74
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FDN | LRND |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A74Higher | B55 |
| Risk | D31 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | A100Higher | A80 |
| Holdings | D32Higher | F22 |
| Durability | A96Higher | A74 |
Rank among US Thematic funds
Same Category. FDN and LRND are both graded against the same 22 US Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FDNC
LRNDA
In short
FDN The original internet ETF. Since 2006 it has held about 40 US companies that earn at least half their revenue from the internet, split between commerce and services: pure-play by construction, concentrated by design, and priced above the thematic average.
Stated mandate
FDN The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index. It normally invests at least 90% of net assets in securities comprising that index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FDN vs LRND Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FDN vs LRND Cost
Overpaying FDN vs LRND
$6,860
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FDN 0.49%
$9,792
LRND 0.14%
$2,932
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FDN | LRND | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $256 | $627 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $1,000 | $2,394 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $2,932 | $6,860 |
- 0.49%FDN
- 0.14%LRND, cheaper
- Middle half of US Thematic funds
- Median 0.35%
LRND cheapest of 22 funds
FDN 13th cheapest of 22 funds
FDN vs LRND Dividends
- FDN 0.00%
- LRND 0.34%, better
- FDN None
- LRND $0.15
- FDN
- LRND $0.04
- FDN
- LRND Sep 30, 2026
- FDN
- LRND Oct 2, 2026
- FDN
- LRND Quarterly
Distribution history
FDN vs LRND Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FDN 20.2%LRND 15.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FDN 0.80LRND 1.13, better
- Worst fall
- FDN −53.6%LRND −25.4%
- Market sensitivity
- FDN 1.23LRND 1.06
FDN and LRND in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.14% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.14% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.14% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
