TECB ranks 2nd and FDN 6th of 22 funds in the US Thematic Category.
FDN vs TECB
TECB −0.19pt a year
0.49%0.30%
FDN 24.6×the volume
230K9.36K
TECB +10.6pt
+1.7%+12.3%
FDN vs TECB Performance
+8.9%+78.4%
- FDN 0.49%
- TECB 0.30%, better
- FDN $4.8B
- TECB $493M
- FDN −6.2%
- TECB +18.8%, better
- FDN 0.00%
- TECB 0.29%, better
- FDN 42
- TECB 173
- FDN 230K sh, better
- TECB 9.36K sh
- FDN $266.42
- TECB $75.32
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FDN | TECB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | A79Higher |
| Mission | A74 | A92Higher |
| Risk | D31 | B55Higher |
| Tradability | A100Higher | A72 |
| Holdings | D32 | B61Higher |
| Durability | A96Higher | A91 |
Rank among US Thematic funds
Same Category. FDN and TECB are both graded against the same 22 US Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FDNC
TECBA
In short
FDN The original internet ETF. Since 2006 it has held about 40 US companies that earn at least half their revenue from the internet, split between commerce and services: pure-play by construction, concentrated by design, and priced above the thematic average.
TECB Five breakthroughs (AI and robotics, cloud and data, cybersecurity, genomics, fintech) in one iShares index fund, priced well under the typical US thematic ETF. Multisector by design, so healthcare and finance names sit beside the chip and software crowd.
Stated mandate
FDN The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index. It normally invests at least 90% of net assets in securities comprising that index.
TECB TECB seeks to track an index of U.S. companies that may benefit from robotics and artificial intelligence, cloud and data technology, cybersecurity, genomics and immunology, and financial technology.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FDN vs TECB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FDN vs TECB Cost
Overpaying FDN vs TECB
$3,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FDN 0.49%
$9,792
TECB 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FDN | TECB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $545 | $338 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $2,113 | $1,281 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $6,149 | $3,643 |
- 0.49%FDN
- 0.30%TECB, cheaper
- Middle half of US Thematic funds
- Median 0.35%
TECB 5th cheapest of 22 funds
FDN 13th cheapest of 22 funds
FDN vs TECB Dividends
- FDN 0.00%
- TECB 0.29%, better
- FDN None
- TECB $0.22
- FDN
- TECB $0.05
- FDN
- TECB Sep 15, 2026
- FDN
- TECB Sep 18, 2026
- FDN
- TECB Quarterly
Distribution history
FDN vs TECB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FDN
- TECB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FDN 20.2%TECB 19.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FDN 0.80TECB 1.17, better
- Worst fall
- FDN −53.6%TECB −41.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FDN 1.23TECB 1.25
FDN and TECB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
