Skip to content

FDRS vs HOMZ

Founder-Led ETF

FDRSDNasdaq

Hoya Capital Housing ETF

HOMZBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

HOMZ −0.19pt a year

FDRS0.49%HOMZ0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

FDRS 25.1×the volume

FDRS71.9KHOMZ2.87K

FDRS vs HOMZ Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

−1.5%FDRS−1.4%HOMZ

Dec 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. FDRS −1.5%. HOMZ −1.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−15%−10%5%10%Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
FDRS 0.49%
HOMZ 0.30%, better
Fund size
FDRS $8M
HOMZ $33M
1Y total return
FDRS No data
HOMZ +0.4%
Yield (12M)
FDRS No data
HOMZ 2.81%
Holdings
FDRS 51
HOMZ 98
Avg volume (30D)
FDRS 71.9K sh, better
HOMZ 2.87K sh
NAV per share
FDRS $24.24
HOMZ $42.51
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FDRS: Cost 40, Risk 25, Mission not scored, Tradability 53, Holdings 32, Durability 54. HOMZ: Cost 79, Risk 36, Mission 68, Tradability 61, Holdings 73, Durability 58.
Pillar letters and Scores for FDRS, HOMZ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFDRSHOMZ
Cost30% weightC40A79Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredB68
Risk15% weightD25D36Higher
Tradability15% weightC53B61Higher
Holdings10% weightD32A73Higher
Durability5% weightC54B58Higher

Rank among US Thematic funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FDRS and HOMZ are both graded against the same 22 US Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Thematic⁠

Category · 22 funds
See all 22 ›

HOMZ ranks 4th and FDRS 17th of 22 funds in the US Thematic Category.

  1. Rank 1ALRNDNYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2ATECBiShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 3BLOHARoundhill HALO ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BHOMZHoya Capital Housing ETFScore 64
  5. Rank 5BCRTCXtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETFScore 62
  6. Rank 17CBUZZVanEck Social Sentiment ETFScore 39
  7. Rank 17DFDRSFounder-Led ETFScore 39
  8. Rank 17DHALXTuttle Capital Heavy Assets Low Obsolescence ETFScore 39

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FDRSDFounder-Led ETF

HOMZBHoya Capital Housing ETF

In short

FDRS Most index funds screen for numbers. FDRS screens for a person: 50 U.S.-listed companies where an original founder still holds a C-suite seat. A governance trait, turned into an index rule.

HOMZ Most housing ETFs pick a lane: homebuilders or apartment REITs. HOMZ buys the whole chain, landlords, builders, home-improvement retailers and housing finance and tech names, sizing each segment by its share of GDP.

Stated mandate

FDRS The fund uses a founder-led equity strategy focused on U.S.-listed companies where an original founder remains in a senior executive role.

HOMZ The Fund seeks to track the performance of the Hoya Capital Housing 100TM Index before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • FDRS The rule is a person, not a slogan: at least one original founder still serving as CEO, President, CTO or CFO. Founder skin in the game, written into the methodology.sec.gov
  • Rules-based and passive. Corgi Strategies sets the criteria, Solactive AG calculates the index, and the fund replicates or samples it. No stock-picker's hunches.sec.gov
  • Fifty founder-run names in one ticker, a theme most investors otherwise have to assemble one stock at a time.sec.gov
  • HOMZ Four housing segments in one ticker: rental operators, builders, home improvement and furnishings, and housing finance, tech and services, each sized by its contribution to GDP rather than market cap.sec.gov
  • The 2019 original: launched as the first ETF offering diversified exposure across the entire US housing sector, and still tracking the index its adviser built.prnewswire.com
  • 0.30% a year, below the 0.45% median for its index-tracking peers, on an index reconstituted and rebalanced on a set schedule each June and December.sec.govsec.gov 2
  • Distributions arrive monthly rather than quarterly, a cadence more common among bond funds than equity sector funds.

Worth knowing

  • FDRS At 0.49% it runs above the typical index-tracking peer, and many times what plain-vanilla trackers like SCHK (0.03%) or SPYV (0.04%) charge.
  • Fifty stocks is concentrated. One company's stumble lands harder here than it would inside a broad-market index.sec.gov
  • Young fund, young index: it launched in late 2025 with a small asset base, so there's little live track record to judge it on.
  • HOMZ A small, thinly traded fund. Spreads can run wider than on mega-cap index trackers, and small funds carry more risk of being closed or repositioned.
  • One industry, roughly 100 stocks. Housing moves with mortgage rates and construction cycles, so this can drift well apart from a broad market fund.
  • Cheap for a themed index fund, still a multiple of plain broad-market trackers: SCHK charges 0.03% and VT 0.06%.

Full FDRS profile⁠

Full HOMZ profile⁠

FDRS vs HOMZ Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FDRS vs HOMZ Cost

Overpaying FDRS vs HOMZ

$3,643

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FDRS 0.49%

    $9,792

  • HOMZ 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FDRS 0.49%
  • HOMZ 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530FDRS $9,792HOMZ $6,149

Year by year

YearFDRSHOMZOverpaying
10$883$545$338
20$3,394$2,113$1,281
30$9,792$6,149$3,643

Expense ratio

  • 0.49%FDRS
  • 0.30%HOMZ, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Thematic funds
  • Median 0.35%

HOMZ 5th cheapest of 22 funds

FDRS 13th cheapest of 22 funds

FDRS vs HOMZ Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
FDRS No data
HOMZ 2.81%
Payout (12M)
FDRS None
HOMZ $1.23
Last payment
FDRS No data
HOMZ $0.10
Ex-dividend
FDRS No data
HOMZ Oct 20, 2026
Paid on
FDRS No data
HOMZ Oct 21, 2026
Frequency
FDRS No data
HOMZ Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

FDRSAll FDRS payments⁠

No distribution history available.

HOMZMonthly · 49 paymentsAll HOMZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 49 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jan 18, 2023 $0.07; Feb 14, 2023 $0.07; Mar 14, 2023 $0.07; Apr 18, 2023 $0.07; May 16, 2023 $0.07; Jun 13, 2023 $0.07; Jul 18, 2023 $0.07; Aug 15, 2023 $0.07; Sep 12, 2023 $0.07; Oct 17, 2023 $0.07; Nov 14, 2023 $0.07; Dec 12, 2023 $0.07; Dec 27, 2023 $0.07; Jan 17, 2024 $0.08; Feb 13, 2024 $0.08; Mar 12, 2024 $0.08; Apr 16, 2024 $0.08; May 14, 2024 $0.08; Jun 11, 2024 $0.08; Jul 16, 2024 $0.08; Aug 13, 2024 $0.08; Sep 17, 2024 $0.08; Oct 15, 2024 $0.08; Nov 12, 2024 $0.08; Dec 17, 2024 $0.08; Dec 30, 2024 $0.07; Jan 22, 2025 $0.09; Feb 19, 2025 $0.09; Mar 18, 2025 $0.09; Apr 15, 2025 $0.09; May 13, 2025 $0.09; Jun 17, 2025 $0.09; Jul 15, 2025 $0.09; Aug 12, 2025 $0.09; Sep 16, 2025 $0.09; Oct 21, 2025 $0.09; Nov 18, 2025 $0.09; Dec 16, 2025 $0.09; Dec 30, 2025 $0.07; Jan 21, 2026 $0.10; Feb 17, 2026 $0.10; Mar 17, 2026 $0.10; Apr 21, 2026 $0.10; May 19, 2026 $0.10; Jun 16, 2026 $0.10; Jul 21, 2026 $0.10; Aug 18, 2026 $0.10; Sep 15, 2026 $0.10; Oct 20, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.1020232026YTD

FDRS vs HOMZ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FDRS No dataHOMZ 21.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FDRS No dataHOMZ 0.41
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FDRS No dataHOMZ −33.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FDRS 1.37HOMZ 1.11

FDRS and HOMZ in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FDRSDvsLRNDA

    Founder-Led ETF · NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.14%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HOMZBvsLRNDA

    Hoya Capital Housing ETF · NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.14%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FDRSDvsTECBA

    Founder-Led ETF · iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HOMZBvsTECBA

    Hoya Capital Housing ETF · iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FDRSDvsLOHAB

    Founder-Led ETF · Roundhill HALO ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HOMZBvsLOHAB

    Hoya Capital Housing ETF · Roundhill HALO ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.