Skip to content

FDRS vs LRND

Founder-Led ETF

FDRSDNasdaq

NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF

LRNDANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

LRND −0.35pt a year

FDRS0.49%LRND0.14%

Avg volume · 30D

FDRS 1.7×the volume

FDRS71.9KLRND42.7K

FDRS vs LRND Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

−1.5%FDRS+8.5%LRND

Dec 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. FDRS −1.5%. LRND +8.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−10%20%Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
FDRS 0.49%
LRND 0.14%, better
Fund size
FDRS $8M
LRND $456M
1Y total return
FDRS No data
LRND +7.4%
Yield (12M)
FDRS No data
LRND 0.34%
Holdings
FDRS 51
LRND 110
Avg volume (30D)
FDRS 71.9K sh, better
LRND 42.7K sh
NAV per share
FDRS $24.24
LRND $44.74
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FDRS: Cost 40, Risk 25, Mission not scored, Tradability 53, Holdings 32, Durability 54. LRND: Cost 100, Risk 62, Mission 55, Tradability 80, Holdings 22, Durability 74.
Pillar letters and Scores for FDRS, LRND, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFDRSLRND
Cost30% weightC40A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredB55
Risk15% weightD25B62Higher
Tradability15% weightC53A80Higher
Holdings10% weightD32HigherF22
Durability5% weightC54A74Higher

Rank among US Thematic funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FDRS and LRND are both graded against the same 22 US Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Thematic⁠

Category · 22 funds
See all 22 ›

LRND ranks 1st and FDRS 17th of 22 funds in the US Thematic Category.

  1. Rank 1ALRNDNYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2ATECBiShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 17CBUZZVanEck Social Sentiment ETFScore 39
  4. Rank 17DFDRSFounder-Led ETFScore 39
  5. Rank 17DHALXTuttle Capital Heavy Assets Low Obsolescence ETFScore 39

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FDRSDFounder-Led ETF

LRNDANYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF

In short

FDRS Most index funds screen for numbers. FDRS screens for a person: 50 U.S.-listed companies where an original founder still holds a C-suite seat. A governance trait, turned into an index rule.

LRND No data

Stated mandate

FDRS The fund uses a founder-led equity strategy focused on U.S.-listed companies where an original founder remains in a senior executive role.

LRND No data

Why people hold it

  • FDRS The rule is a person, not a slogan: at least one original founder still serving as CEO, President, CTO or CFO. Founder skin in the game, written into the methodology.sec.gov
  • Rules-based and passive. Corgi Strategies sets the criteria, Solactive AG calculates the index, and the fund replicates or samples it. No stock-picker's hunches.sec.gov
  • Fifty founder-run names in one ticker, a theme most investors otherwise have to assemble one stock at a time.sec.gov

LRND No data

Worth knowing

  • FDRS At 0.49% it runs above the typical index-tracking peer, and many times what plain-vanilla trackers like SCHK (0.03%) or SPYV (0.04%) charge.
  • Fifty stocks is concentrated. One company's stumble lands harder here than it would inside a broad-market index.sec.gov
  • Young fund, young index: it launched in late 2025 with a small asset base, so there's little live track record to judge it on.

LRND No data

Full FDRS profile⁠

Full LRND profile⁠

FDRS vs LRND Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FDRS vs LRND Cost

Overpaying FDRS vs LRND

$6,860

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FDRS 0.49%

    $9,792

  • LRND 0.14%

    $2,932

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FDRS 0.49%
  • LRND 0.14%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530FDRS $9,792LRND $2,932

Year by year

YearFDRSLRNDOverpaying
10$883$256$627
20$3,394$1,000$2,394
30$9,792$2,932$6,860

Expense ratio

  • 0.49%FDRS
  • 0.14%LRND, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Thematic funds
  • Median 0.35%

LRND cheapest of 22 funds

FDRS 13th cheapest of 22 funds

FDRS vs LRND Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
FDRS No data
LRND 0.34%
Payout (12M)
FDRS None
LRND $0.15
Last payment
FDRS No data
LRND $0.04
Ex-dividend
FDRS No data
LRND Sep 30, 2026
Paid on
FDRS No data
LRND Oct 2, 2026
Frequency
FDRS No data
LRND Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

FDRSAll FDRS payments⁠

No distribution history available.

LRNDQuarterly · 19 paymentsAll LRND payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Mar 18, 2022 $0.04; Jun 17, 2022 $0.08; Sep 16, 2022 $0.07; Dec 16, 2022 $0.08; Mar 31, 2023 $0.09; Jun 30, 2023 $0.07; Sep 29, 2023 $0.07; Dec 15, 2023 $0.11; Mar 28, 2024 $0.08; Jun 28, 2024 $0.08; Sep 30, 2024 $0.09; Dec 30, 2024 $0.08; Mar 31, 2025 $0.09; Jun 30, 2025 $0.08; Sep 30, 2025 $0.08; Dec 30, 2025 $0.02; Mar 31, 2026 $0.04; Jun 30, 2026 $0.05; Sep 30, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.1020232026YTD

FDRS vs LRND Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FDRS No dataLRND 15.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FDRS No dataLRND 1.13
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FDRS No dataLRND −25.4%since Feb 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FDRS 1.37LRND 1.06

Popular comparisons

  • FDRSDvsTECBA

    Founder-Led ETF · iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRNDAvsTECBA

    NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF · iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FDRSDvsLOHAB

    Founder-Led ETF · Roundhill HALO ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRNDAvsLOHAB

    NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF · Roundhill HALO ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FDRSDvsHOMZB

    Founder-Led ETF · Hoya Capital Housing ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRNDAvsHOMZB

    NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF · Hoya Capital Housing ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.