Skip to content

FEMG vs FEMV

Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF

FEMGBNYSE Arca

Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF

FEMVANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

FEMG0.23%FEMV0.23%

Avg volume · 30D

FEMG 1.7×the volume

FEMG2.59KFEMV1.5K

FEMG vs FEMV Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026

−2.9%FEMG+2.4%FEMV

Jul 31, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026. FEMG −2.9%. FEMV +2.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%4%6%8%Jul 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
FEMG 0.23%
FEMV 0.23%
Fund size
FEMG $6M
FEMV $7M
Holdings
FEMG 173
FEMV 270
Avg volume (30D)
FEMG 2.59K sh, better
FEMV 1.5K sh
NAV per share
FEMG $25.00
FEMV $27.59
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FEMG: Cost 97, Risk 35, Mission not scored, Tradability 52, Holdings 56, Durability 35. FEMV: Cost 97, Risk 93, Mission not scored, Tradability 47, Holdings 82, Durability 35.
Pillar letters and Scores for FEMG, FEMV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFEMGFEMV
Cost30% weightA97A97
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD35A93Higher
Tradability15% weightC52HigherC47
Holdings10% weightB56A82Higher
Durability5% weightD35D35

Rank among US Active Small/Mid-Cap funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FEMG and FEMV are both graded against the same 47 US Active Small/Mid-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Small/Mid-Cap⁠

Category · 47 funds
See all 47 ›

FEMV ranks 2nd and FEMG 7th of 47 funds in the US Active Small/Mid-Cap Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVMCAvantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETFScore 89
  2. Rank 2AFEMVFidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETFScore 79
  3. Rank 3ADFMCU.S. Micro Cap Portfolio ETFScore 76
  4. Rank 7BASCEAllspring SMID Core ETFScore 65
  5. Rank 7BFEMGFidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETFScore 65
  6. Rank 9BMCDSJPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETFScore 64

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FEMGBFidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF

FEMVAFidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF

In short

FEMG Active mid-cap growth priced like an index fund. Fidelity's quant team starts from the Russell Midcap Growth Index, then tilts toward valuation, growth and quality signals across roughly 130 names for 0.23% a year.

FEMV Active mid-cap value, priced like an index fund. FEMV hunts capital appreciation in the Russell Midcap Value corner of the US market for 0.23% a year, a fraction of the typical active US equity ETF fee.

Stated mandate

FEMG The fund seeks capital appreciation. It normally invests at least 80% in common stocks from the Russell Midcap Growth Index and uses research on valuation, growth, quality, and other return drivers.

FEMV The fund seeks capital appreciation and targets the U.S. mid-cap value segment of the equity market.

Why people hold it

  • FEMG Costs 0.23% a year, versus a median near 0.65% for active US equity funds. Most of the fee gap active management usually asks for simply isn't here.
  • Index-aware by design: at least 80% sits in Russell Midcap Growth constituents, so the exposure stays recognizable while managers lean on valuation, growth and quality research.fidelity.com
  • Roughly 130 stocks. Tight enough that manager calls actually register, broad enough that no single name runs the portfolio.
  • Undercuts JMID, the other ETF benchmarked to the same Russell Midcap Growth Index, on fee. Cheap entry to a thinly populated corner.
  • FEMV 0.23% a year, well under the going rate for active US equity ETFs. At that price, cost stops being the argument against going active.
  • The mandate is stated plainly: US mid-cap value, measured against the Russell Midcap Value index, aiming at capital appreciation. Little guesswork about what you own.fidelity.com
  • The portfolio mix and risk profile screen well against other active US stock ETFs, with no leverage, derivatives quirks or unusual wrapper features flagged in the structure.
  • Part of Fidelity's Enhanced lineup, whose large-cap sibling FELC (0.18%) ranks among the strongest active US equity funds in the peer group.

Worth knowing

  • FEMG Launched in 2026. The track record is short, so risk and tracking behavior rest on limited history rather than a full market cycle.
  • Small asset base and light trading volume mean bid-ask spreads can run wider than at the category's giants, especially in fast markets.
  • Mid-cap growth is a jumpier ride than large-cap core, and active tilts mean returns can diverge from the Russell Midcap Growth Index in either direction.
  • FEMV Launched in 2026, so there is no long record to lean on and the risk read rests on a short history.
  • A small asset base and thin trading volume are the trade-off for being early. Spreads can run wider than at a mega-fund, especially in fast markets.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. This is a growth-of-capital mandate, not an income schedule.

Full FEMG profile⁠

Full FEMV profile⁠

FEMG vs FEMV Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FEMG vs FEMV Cost

Same expense ratio

$4,759

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FEMG 0.23%

    $4,759

  • FEMV 0.23%

    $4,759

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FEMG 0.23%
  • FEMV 0.23%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1K$2K$3K$4K$5K051015202530FEMG $4,759FEMV $4,759

Year by year

YearFEMGFEMV
10$419$419
20$1,630$1,630
30$4,759$4,759

Expense ratio

  • 0.23%FEMG
  • 0.23%FEMV
  • Middle half of US Active Small/Mid-Cap funds
  • Median 0.55%

FEMG 2nd cheapest of 47 funds

FEMV 2nd cheapest of 47 funds

FEMG vs FEMV Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Last payment
FEMG $0.02
FEMV $0.09
Ex-dividend
FEMG Sep 18, 2026
FEMV Sep 18, 2026
Paid on
FEMG Sep 22, 2026
FEMV Sep 22, 2026
Frequency
FEMG Quarterly
FEMV Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2026, same scale for both

FEMGQuarterly · 2 paymentsAll FEMG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments in 2026 YTD. Jun 18, 2026 $0.03; Sep 18, 2026 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102026YTD
FEMVQuarterly · 2 paymentsAll FEMV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments in 2026 YTD. Jun 18, 2026 $0.07; Sep 18, 2026 $0.09. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102026YTD

FEMG vs FEMV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FEMG 0.99FEMV −0.05

Popular comparisons

  • FEMGBvsAVMCA

    Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF · Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.23% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FEMVAvsAVMCA

    Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF · Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.23% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FEMGBvsDFMCA

    Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF · U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.23% · 0.43%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FEMVAvsDFMCA

    Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF · U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.23% · 0.43%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FEMGBvsJMEEA

    Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF · JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enhanced Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.23% · 0.34%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FEMVAvsJMEEA

    Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF · JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enhanced Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.23% · 0.34%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.