Skip to content

FEMV vs PCSG

Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF

FEMVANYSE Arca

Polen 5Perspectives Small-Mid Growth ETF

PCSGFNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

FEMV −0.52pt a year

FEMV0.23%PCSG0.75%

Avg volume · 30D

FEMV 1.9×the volume

FEMV1.5KPCSG779

FEMV vs PCSG Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+1.9%FEMV−7.1%PCSG

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. FEMV +1.9%. PCSG −7.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FEMV 0.23%, better
PCSG 0.75%
Fund size
FEMV $7M
PCSG $3M
Holdings
FEMV 270
PCSG 85
Avg volume (30D)
FEMV 1.5K sh, better
PCSG 779 sh
NAV per share
FEMV $27.59
PCSG $21.44
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FEMV: Cost 97, Risk 93, Mission not scored, Tradability 47, Holdings 82, Durability 35. PCSG: Cost 22, Risk 1, Mission not scored, Tradability 27, Holdings 51, Durability 25.
Pillar letters and Scores for FEMV, PCSG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFEMVPCSG
Cost30% weightA97HigherF22
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA93HigherF1
Tradability15% weightC47HigherD27
Holdings10% weightA82HigherC51
Durability5% weightD35HigherD25

Rank among US Active Small/Mid-Cap funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FEMV and PCSG are both graded against the same 47 US Active Small/Mid-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Small/Mid-Cap⁠

Category · 47 funds
See all 47 ›

FEMV ranks 2nd and PCSG 43rd of 47 funds in the US Active Small/Mid-Cap Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVMCAvantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETFScore 89
  2. Rank 2AFEMVFidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETFScore 79
  3. Rank 3ADFMCU.S. Micro Cap Portfolio ETFScore 76
  4. Rank 42FKMIDVirtus KAR Mid-Cap ETFScore 23
  5. Rank 43FPCSGPolen 5Perspectives Small-Mid Growth ETFScore 22
  6. Rank 44FBCSMBaron SMID Cap ETFScore 21
  7. AEMCNot yet graded
  8. AEMVNot yet graded
  9. PJSMNot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FEMVAFidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF

PCSGFPolen 5Perspectives Small-Mid Growth ETF

In short

FEMV Active mid-cap value, priced like an index fund. FEMV hunts capital appreciation in the Russell Midcap Value corner of the US market for 0.23% a year, a fraction of the typical active US equity ETF fee.

PCSG A 20-year-old small/mid growth strategy in a new wrapper. Drew Cupps has run 5Perspectives since 2005; PCSG brings that focused, theme-driven book to an ETF at 0.75%, with no fee waiver in play.

Stated mandate

FEMV The fund seeks capital appreciation and targets the U.S. mid-cap value segment of the equity market.

PCSG The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital.

Why people hold it

  • FEMV 0.23% a year, well under the going rate for active US equity ETFs. At that price, cost stops being the argument against going active.
  • The mandate is stated plainly: US mid-cap value, measured against the Russell Midcap Value index, aiming at capital appreciation. Little guesswork about what you own.fidelity.com
  • The portfolio mix and risk profile screen well against other active US stock ETFs, with no leverage, derivatives quirks or unusual wrapper features flagged in the structure.
  • Part of Fidelity's Enhanced lineup, whose large-cap sibling FELC (0.18%) ranks among the strongest active US equity funds in the peer group.
  • PCSG The fund is new, the strategy isn't: Drew Cupps has run 5Perspectives Small-Mid Growth since its 2005 start, landing with it at Polen in 2025.polencapital.comsec.gov
  • Truly active and focused: a concentrated book of innovative small- and mid-cap growers built around AI, electrification, aerospace and genomics.polencapital.commanilatimes.net
  • Flat 0.75% fee with no waiver propping it up, so there is no step-up date to diary.

Worth knowing

  • FEMV Launched in 2026, so there is no long record to lean on and the risk read rests on a short history.
  • A small asset base and thin trading volume are the trade-off for being early. Spreads can run wider than at a mega-fund, especially in fast markets.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. This is a growth-of-capital mandate, not an income schedule.
  • PCSG At 0.75% it prices above the SMID category median; systematic peers run cheaper, like AVMC at 0.18% and JMEE at 0.35%.
  • Launched May 2026, so the fund's own record is short; the strategy's longer history was built in separate accounts, a different vehicle.polencapital.com
  • Thinly traded so far, so limit orders matter, and no distributions since launch: growth, not income.

Full FEMV profile⁠

Full PCSG profile⁠

FEMV vs PCSG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FEMV vs PCSG Cost

Overpaying PCSG vs FEMV

$9,723

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FEMV 0.23%

    $4,759

  • PCSG 0.75%

    $14,482

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FEMV 0.23%
  • PCSG 0.75%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530PCSG $14,482FEMV $4,759

Year by year

YearFEMVPCSGOverpaying
10$419$1,336$917
20$1,630$5,078$3,448
30$4,759$14,482$9,723

Expense ratio

  • 0.23%FEMV, cheaper
  • 0.75%PCSG
  • Middle half of US Active Small/Mid-Cap funds
  • Median 0.55%

FEMV 2nd cheapest of 47 funds

PCSG 34th cheapest of 47 funds

FEMV vs PCSG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
FEMV No data
PCSG None
Last payment
FEMV $0.09
PCSG No data
Ex-dividend
FEMV Sep 18, 2026
PCSG No data
Paid on
FEMV Sep 22, 2026
PCSG No data
Frequency
FEMV Quarterly
PCSG No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2026, same scale for both

FEMVQuarterly · 2 paymentsAll FEMV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments in 2026 YTD. Jun 18, 2026 $0.07; Sep 18, 2026 $0.09. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102026YTD
PCSGAll PCSG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FEMV vs PCSG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FEMV −0.05PCSG 0.67

Popular comparisons

  • FEMVAvsAVMCA

    Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF · Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.23% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PCSGFvsAVMCA

    Polen 5Perspectives Small-Mid Growth ETF · Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FEMVAvsDFMCA

    Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF · U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.23% · 0.43%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PCSGFvsDFMCA

    Polen 5Perspectives Small-Mid Growth ETF · U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.43%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FEMVAvsJMEEA

    Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF · JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enhanced Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.23% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PCSGFvsJMEEA

    Polen 5Perspectives Small-Mid Growth ETF · JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enhanced Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.