Skip to content

FEMV vs REMC

Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF

FEMVANYSE Arca

Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF

REMCANYSE Arca

Overlap

30.4%by weight

Expense ratio

FEMV −0.09pt a year

FEMV0.23%REMC0.32%

Avg volume · 30D

FEMV 1.3×the volume

FEMV1.5KREMC1.15K

FEMV vs REMC Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+1.9%FEMV+1.3%REMC

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. FEMV +1.9%. REMC +1.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−3%−2%−1%0%3%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FEMV 0.23%, better
REMC 0.32%
Fund size
FEMV $7M
REMC $6M
Holdings
FEMV 270
REMC 281
Avg volume (30D)
FEMV 1.5K sh, better
REMC 1.15K sh
NAV per share
FEMV $27.59
REMC $23.29
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FEMV: Cost 97, Risk 93, Mission not scored, Tradability 47, Holdings 82, Durability 35. REMC: Cost 89, Risk 81, Mission not scored, Tradability 39, Holdings 71, Durability 27.
Pillar letters and Scores for FEMV, REMC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFEMVREMC
Cost30% weightA97HigherA89
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA93HigherA81
Tradability15% weightC47HigherD39
Holdings10% weightA82HigherA71
Durability5% weightD35HigherD27

Rank among US Active Small/Mid-Cap funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FEMV and REMC are both graded against the same 47 US Active Small/Mid-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Small/Mid-Cap⁠

Category · 47 funds
See all 47 ›

FEMV ranks 2nd and REMC 5th of 47 funds in the US Active Small/Mid-Cap Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVMCAvantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETFScore 89
  2. Rank 2AFEMVFidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETFScore 79
  3. Rank 3ADFMCU.S. Micro Cap Portfolio ETFScore 76
  4. Rank 4AJMEEJPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enhanced Equity ETFScore 72
  5. Rank 5AREMCColumbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETFScore 70
  6. Rank 6BSMDXIntech S&P Small-Mid Cap Diversified Alpha ETFScore 68

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FEMVAFidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF

REMCAColumbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF

In short

FEMV Active mid-cap value, priced like an index fund. FEMV hunts capital appreciation in the Russell Midcap Value corner of the US market for 0.23% a year, a fraction of the typical active US equity ETF fee.

REMC Mid caps are US equity's forgotten middle child. REMC is Columbia's active swing at them: a research-driven stock-picking mandate priced at 0.32%, closer to index-fund money than typical active fare.

Stated mandate

FEMV The fund seeks capital appreciation and targets the U.S. mid-cap value segment of the equity market.

REMC Actively managed ETF that invests primarily in U.S. mid‐capitalization equities using a research‐enhanced active strategy.

Why people hold it

  • FEMV 0.23% a year, well under the going rate for active US equity ETFs. At that price, cost stops being the argument against going active.
  • The mandate is stated plainly: US mid-cap value, measured against the Russell Midcap Value index, aiming at capital appreciation. Little guesswork about what you own.fidelity.com
  • The portfolio mix and risk profile screen well against other active US stock ETFs, with no leverage, derivatives quirks or unusual wrapper features flagged in the structure.
  • Part of Fidelity's Enhanced lineup, whose large-cap sibling FELC (0.18%) ranks among the strongest active US equity funds in the peer group.
  • REMC Charges 0.32%, well under the peer-group median for active US equity ETFs. Active management rarely comes that cheap.
  • Actively managed rather than index-tracking, so the portfolio reflects research calls on individual mid-cap names instead of pure market weights.
  • Fills a gap: the standouts in its peer group (DFAU, FELC, AVLC) are large-cap or total-market sleeves. REMC's mandate points squarely at the middle of the market.

Worth knowing

  • FEMV Launched in 2026, so there is no long record to lean on and the risk read rests on a short history.
  • A small asset base and thin trading volume are the trade-off for being early. Spreads can run wider than at a mega-fund, especially in fast markets.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. This is a growth-of-capital mandate, not an income schedule.
  • REMC Launched in December 2025, so the live record is short and its risk profile rests on a thin window of data.
  • Started small and thinly traded. Low-volume ETFs can carry wider bid-ask spreads, so real trading costs can run above the headline fee.
  • Cheaper options sit in the same peer group: DFAU at 0.12% and AVLC at 0.15%, though both cast a broader, large-cap-heavy net.

Full FEMV profile⁠

Full REMC profile⁠

FEMV vs REMC Holdings

How FEMV and REMC differ

Overlap by weight

30.4%

Shared holdings make up 48.0% of REMC and 41.5% of FEMV.

Level by level

  • Holdings102 in both30.4%
  • Countryby domicile99.2%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for FEMV and REMC.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in FEMV and REMC, widest gap first
CountryMore in FEMVMore in REMC
United StatesREMC +0.8 points
United KingdomFEMV +0.5 points
Other countries (4)FEMV +0.4 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • FEMV10.4%
  • REMC15.8%

Securities held

  • FEMV267
  • REMC279

Asset class

FEMV
Equity
REMC
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in FEMV165
  • In both102
  • Only in REMC177

Only in FEMV

165 securities, 58.0% of FEMV by weight

  • Allstate Corporation1.16%
  • Nucor Corp1.11%
  • Marathon Petroleum Corp1.08%

Only in REMC

177 securities, 51.7% of REMC by weight

  • Snowflake Inc1.97%
  • Datadog Inc1.52%
  • Allstate Corp/The1.43%

Weight gaps

The 100 widest of 102 Holdings in both funds.

Holding weights in FEMV and REMC, widest gap first
HoldingMore in FEMVMore in REMC
Phillips 66PSXREMC +1.73 points
Simon Ppty Group Inc - ReitSPGREMC +1.47 points
Becton Dickinson & CoBDXAREMC +1.00 points
Delta Air IncDALREMC +0.96 points
Entergy CorpETRREMC +0.82 points
Ferguson Enterprises IncFERGREMC +0.76 points
Anglogold Ashanti PLCREMC +0.76 points
Cardinal Health IncCAHREMC +0.72 points

All FEMV holdings⁠All REMC holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FEMV vs REMC Cost

Overpaying REMC vs FEMV

$1,783

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FEMV 0.23%

    $4,759

  • REMC 0.32%

    $6,542

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FEMV 0.23%
  • REMC 0.32%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530REMC $6,542FEMV $4,759

Year by year

YearFEMVREMCOverpaying
10$419$580$161
20$1,630$2,250$620
30$4,759$6,542$1,783

Expense ratio

  • 0.23%FEMV, cheaper
  • 0.32%REMC
  • Middle half of US Active Small/Mid-Cap funds
  • Median 0.55%

FEMV 2nd cheapest of 47 funds

REMC 6th cheapest of 47 funds

FEMV vs REMC Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Last payment
FEMV $0.09
REMC $0.02
Ex-dividend
FEMV Sep 18, 2026
REMC Dec 18, 2025
Paid on
FEMV Sep 22, 2026
REMC Dec 26, 2025
Frequency
FEMV Quarterly
REMC Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

FEMVQuarterly · 2 paymentsAll FEMV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Jun 18, 2026 $0.07; Sep 18, 2026 $0.09. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102026YTD
REMCIrregular · 1 paymentAll REMC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2025 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102026YTD

FEMV vs REMC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FEMV −0.05REMC 0.54

Popular comparisons

  • FEMVAvsAVMCA

    Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF · Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.23% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • REMCAvsAVMCA

    Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF · Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.32% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FEMVAvsDFMCA

    Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF · U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.23% · 0.43%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • REMCAvsDFMCA

    Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF · U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.32% · 0.43%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FEMVAvsJMEEA

    Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF · JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enhanced Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.23% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • REMCAvsJMEEA

    Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF · JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enhanced Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.32% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.