Skip to content

FEMV vs SMCO

Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF

FEMVANYSE Arca

Hilton Small-MidCap Opportunity ETF

SMCOBNasdaq

Overlap

5.9%by weight

Expense ratio

FEMV −0.32pt a year

FEMV0.23%SMCO0.55%

Avg volume · 30D

SMCO 13.1×the volume

FEMV1.51KSMCO19.7K

FEMV vs SMCO Performance

Aug 3, 2026 – Nov 3, 2026

+1.6%FEMV−5.5%SMCO

Aug 3, 2026 to Nov 3, 2026. FEMV +1.6%. SMCO −5.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−7.5%−2.5%0%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
FEMV 0.23%, better
SMCO 0.55%
Fund size
FEMV $7M
SMCO $147M
1Y total return
FEMV No data
SMCO +6.9%
Yield (12M)
FEMV No data
SMCO 0.95%
Holdings
FEMV 270
SMCO 63
Avg volume (30D)
FEMV 1.51K sh
SMCO 19.7K sh, better
NAV per share
FEMV $27.70
SMCO $28.43
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FEMV: Cost 97, Risk 93, Mission not scored, Tradability 49, Holdings 80, Durability 35. SMCO: Cost 54, Risk 43, Mission not scored, Tradability 75, Holdings 49, Durability 49.
Pillar letters and Scores for FEMV, SMCO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFEMVSMCO
Cost30% weightA97HigherC54
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA93HigherC43
Tradability15% weightC49A75Higher
Holdings10% weightA80HigherC49
Durability5% weightD35C49Higher

Rank among US Active Small/Mid-Cap funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FEMV and SMCO are both graded against the same 47 US Active Small/Mid-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Small/Mid-Cap⁠

Category · 47 funds
See all 47 ›

FEMV ranks 2nd and SMCO 18th of 47 funds in the US Active Small/Mid-Cap Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVMCAvantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETFScore 89
  2. Rank 2AFEMVFidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETFScore 80
  3. Rank 3ADFMCU.S. Micro Cap Portfolio ETFScore 77
  4. Rank 16BSMIZZacks Small/Mid Cap ETFScore 56
  5. Rank 18BSMCOHilton Small-MidCap Opportunity ETFScore 55
  6. Rank 19BAFMCFirst Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETFScore 54

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FEMVAFidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF

SMCOBHilton Small-MidCap Opportunity ETF

In short

FEMV Active mid-cap value, priced like an index fund. FEMV hunts capital appreciation in the Russell Midcap Value corner of the US market for 0.23% a year, a fraction of the typical active US equity ETF fee.

SMCO An active small- and mid-cap stock picker in a peer group stuffed with cheap large-cap core index funds. Hilton's sub-adviser runs a proprietary US small/mid process built for long-term capital appreciation, priced under the typical active US equity fund.

Stated mandate

FEMV The fund seeks capital appreciation and targets the U.S. mid-cap value segment of the equity market.

SMCO The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.

Why people hold it

  • FEMV 0.23% a year, well under the going rate for active US equity ETFs. At that price, cost stops being the argument against going active.
  • The mandate is stated plainly: US mid-cap value, measured against the Russell Midcap Value index, aiming at capital appreciation. Little guesswork about what you own.fidelity.com
  • The portfolio mix and risk profile screen well against other active US stock ETFs, with no leverage, derivatives quirks or unusual wrapper features flagged in the structure.
  • Part of Fidelity's Enhanced lineup, whose large-cap sibling FELC (0.18%) ranks among the strongest active US equity funds in the peer group.
  • SMCO Charges 0.55% a year, below the 0.65% median for active US equity funds. Not index-fund cheap, but light for a discretionary stock-picking mandate.
  • Hunts US small and mid caps, the ground the cohort's top-scoring giants (DFAU, FELC, DFAC) mostly skip with their large-cap core books.
  • The portfolio itself is the strongest part of the package: a diversified US equity book with no structural quirks in the wrapper, and it lands in the upper half of its peer group.

Worth knowing

  • FEMV Launched in 2026, so there is no long record to lean on and the risk read rests on a short history.
  • A small asset base and thin trading volume are the trade-off for being early. Spreads can run wider than at a mega-fund, especially in fast markets.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. This is a growth-of-capital mandate, not an income schedule.
  • SMCO Thinly traded. Spreads can run wider than in the category's mega-funds, so order size and timing matter more here than with a household-name index ETF.
  • Launched in late 2023, so the record is short and covers one stretch of market weather.
  • Small and mid caps swing harder than large caps, and there is no published index to measure the manager against. Outcomes ride on the sub-adviser's process.

Full FEMV profile⁠

Full SMCO profile⁠

FEMV vs SMCO Holdings

How FEMV and SMCO differ

Overlap by weight

5.9%

Shared holdings make up 27.0% of SMCO and 5.9% of FEMV.

Level by level

  • Holdings18 in both5.9%
  • Sector11 Sectors80.8%
  • Countryby domicile98.8%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in FEMV and SMCO, widest gap first
SectorMore in FEMVMore in SMCOGap
TechnologySMCO +6.4 points
FinancialsFEMV +6.2 points
Real EstateFEMV +5.7 points
IndustrialsSMCO +5.7 points
Consumer DiscretionaryFEMV +3.0 points
MaterialsFEMV +2.5 points
CommunicationSMCO +2.5 points
Consumer StaplesSMCO +2.4 points
Health CareSMCO +2.2 points
EnergyFEMV +1.3 points
UtilitiesFEMV +0.4 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in FEMV and SMCO, widest gap first
CountryMore in FEMVMore in SMCOGap
United KingdomSMCO +1.3 points
United StatesFEMV +0.8 points
Other countries (4)FEMV +0.5 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • FEMV10.3%
  • SMCO23.7%

Securities held

  • FEMV267
  • SMCO62

Asset class

FEMV
Equity
SMCO
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in FEMV249
  • In both18
  • Only in SMCO44

Only in FEMV

249 securities, 93.5% of FEMV by weight

  • Allstate Corporation1.20%
  • Nucor Corp1.12%
  • Marathon Petroleum Corp1.07%

Only in SMCO

44 securities, 72.3% of SMCO by weight

  • HealthEquity Inc2.71%
  • Cullen/Frost Bankers Inc2.57%
  • Teledyne Technologies Inc2.56%

Weight gaps

All 18 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in FEMV and SMCO, widest gap first
HoldingMore in FEMVMore in SMCOGap
West Pharmaceutical Svcs IncWSTSMCO +2.21 points
Steris PLCSTESMCO +1.95 points
Henry (Jack) & Associates IncJKHYSMCO +1.71 points
Commerce Bancshares IncCBSHSMCO +1.59 points
Landstar System IncLSTRSMCO +1.18 points
Nvent Electric PLCNVTSMCO +1.17 points
Ralph Lauren CorpRLSMCO +1.17 points
Clearway Energy Inc Class CCWENSMCO +1.15 points

All FEMV holdings⁠All SMCO holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FEMV vs SMCO Cost

Overpaying SMCO vs FEMV

$6,145

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FEMV 0.23%

    $4,759

  • SMCO 0.55%

    $10,904

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FEMV 0.23%
  • SMCO 0.55%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530SMCO $10,904FEMV $4,759

Year by year

YearFEMVSMCOOverpaying
10$419$988$569
20$1,630$3,790$2,160
30$4,759$10,904$6,145

Expense ratio

  • 0.23%FEMV, cheaper
  • 0.55%SMCO
  • Middle half of US Active Small/Mid-Cap funds
  • Median 0.55%

FEMV 2nd cheapest of 47 funds

SMCO 20th cheapest of 47 funds

FEMV vs SMCO Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 3, 2026
Yield (12M)
FEMV No data
SMCO 0.95%
Payout (12M)
FEMV No data
SMCO $0.27
Last payment
FEMV $0.09
SMCO $0.27
Ex-dividend
FEMV Sep 18, 2026
SMCO Dec 30, 2025
Paid on
FEMV Sep 22, 2026
SMCO Dec 31, 2025
Frequency
FEMV Quarterly
SMCO Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

FEMVQuarterly · 2 paymentsAll FEMV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jun 18, 2026 $0.07; Sep 18, 2026 $0.09. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
SMCOAnnual · 3 paymentsAll SMCO payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2023 $0.01; Dec 17, 2024 $0.12; Dec 30, 2025 $0.27. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

FEMV vs SMCO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FEMV No dataSMCO 16.1%since Dec 2023
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FEMV No dataSMCO 0.54since Dec 2023
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FEMV No dataSMCO −22.7%since Nov 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FEMV −0.05SMCO 1.14

FEMV and SMCO in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FEMVAvsAVMCA

    Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF · Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.23% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SMCOBvsAVMCA

    Hilton Small-MidCap Opportunity ETF · Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FEMVAvsDFMCA

    Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF · U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.23% · 0.43%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SMCOBvsDFMCA

    Hilton Small-MidCap Opportunity ETF · U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.43%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FEMVAvsJMEEA

    Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF · JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enhanced Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.23% · 0.34%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SMCOBvsJMEEA

    Hilton Small-MidCap Opportunity ETF · JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enhanced Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.34%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.