FEZ ranks 4th and FGM 10th of 12 funds in the Europe Region Category.
FEZ vs FGM
FEZ −0.51pt a year
0.29%0.80%
FEZ 330.0×the volume
857K2.6K
FEZ +3.0pt
+10.1%+7.1%
FEZ vs FGM Performance
+58.5%+18.5%
- FEZ 0.29%, better
- FGM 0.80%
- FEZ $4.16B
- FGM $86M
- FEZ +6.9%, better
- FGM +0.6%
- FEZ 2.81%, better
- FGM 1.86%
- FEZ 53
- FGM 43
- FEZ 857K sh, better
- FGM 2.6K sh
- FEZ $65.89
- FGM $57.63
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FEZ | FGM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A72Higher | F7 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A94 |
| Risk | C42Higher | F15 |
| Tradability | B62Higher | C43 |
| Holdings | C52 | B56Higher |
| Durability | A77Higher | D36 |
Rank among Europe Region funds
Same Category. FEZ and FGM are both graded against the same 12 Europe Region funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FEZA
FGMC
In short
FEZ Fifty eurozone blue chips, one ticker, running since 2002. FEZ is the long-standing US-listed route into the euro area's biggest companies, and it charges well below the typical index fund in its peer group.
FGM Most Germany ETFs hand you the blue chips in market-cap order. FGM screens German stocks on growth and value marks and weights them by rank instead, landing on roughly 40 names. A different Germany, at a premium price.
Stated mandate
FEZ The fund seeks to deliver total returns that generally correspond to the EURO STOXX 50 Index before fees and expenses.
FGM The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Nasdaq AlphaDEX® GermanyTM Index, an equity index focused on companies assigned to Germany.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FEZ vs FGM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FEZ vs FGM Cost
Overpaying FGM vs FEZ
$9,394
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FEZ 0.29%
$5,952
FGM 0.80%
$15,346
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FEZ | FGM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $527 | $1,422 | $895 |
| 20 | $2,044 | $5,393 | $3,349 |
| 30 | $5,952 | $15,346 | $9,394 |
- 0.29%FEZ, cheaper
- 0.80%FGM
- Middle half of Europe Region funds
- Median 0.51%
FEZ 4th cheapest of 12 funds
FGM 11th cheapest of 12 funds
FEZ vs FGM Dividends
- FEZ 2.81%, better
- FGM 1.86%
- FEZ $1.83
- FGM $1.07
- FEZ $0.11
- FGM $0.19
- FEZ Sep 21, 2026
- FGM Sep 24, 2026
- FEZ Sep 23, 2026
- FGM Sep 30, 2026
- FEZ Quarterly
- FGM Quarterly
Distribution history
FEZ vs FGM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FEZ
- FGM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FEZ 14.3%, betterFGM 18.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- FEZ 1.02, betterFGM 0.95
- Worst fall
- FEZ −35.1%, betterFGM −48.3%
- Market sensitivity
- FEZ 0.95FGM 1.16
FEZ and FGM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.29% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

