EZU ranks 2nd and FGM 10th of 12 funds in the Europe Region Category.
EZU vs FGM
EZU −0.30pt a year
0.50%0.80%
EZU 376.3×the volume
977K2.6K
EZU +2.4pt
+9.5%+7.1%
EZU vs FGM Performance
+49.7%+18.5%
- EZU 0.50%, better
- FGM 0.80%
- EZU $9.13B
- FGM $86M
- EZU +7.7%, better
- FGM +0.6%
- EZU 2.83%, better
- FGM 1.86%
- EZU 220
- FGM 43
- EZU 977K sh, better
- FGM 2.6K sh
- EZU $65.37
- FGM $57.63
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EZU | FGM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B59Higher | F7 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A94 |
| Risk | C46Higher | F15 |
| Tradability | A89Higher | C43 |
| Holdings | A72Higher | B56 |
| Durability | A81Higher | D36 |
Rank among Europe Region funds
Same Category. EZU and FGM are both graded against the same 12 Europe Region funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EZUA
FGMC
In short
EZU Europe minus the UK, Switzerland and the Nordics. EZU holds only developed countries that use the euro, about 220 large and mid caps, and it has been doing that job since 2000.
FGM Most Germany ETFs hand you the blue chips in market-cap order. FGM screens German stocks on growth and value marks and weights them by rank instead, landing on roughly 40 names. A different Germany, at a premium price.
Stated mandate
EZU The fund seeks to track an index of large- and mid-cap equities from developed countries that use the euro, providing diversified Eurozone equity exposure.
FGM The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Nasdaq AlphaDEX® GermanyTM Index, an equity index focused on companies assigned to Germany.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EZU vs FGM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EZU vs FGM Cost
Overpaying FGM vs EZU
$5,367
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EZU 0.50%
$9,979
FGM 0.80%
$15,346
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EZU | FGM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,422 | $522 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $5,393 | $1,933 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $15,346 | $5,367 |
- 0.50%EZU, cheaper
- 0.80%FGM
- Middle half of Europe Region funds
- Median 0.51%
EZU 5th cheapest of 12 funds
FGM 11th cheapest of 12 funds
EZU vs FGM Dividends
- EZU 2.83%, better
- FGM 1.86%
- EZU $1.84
- FGM $1.07
- EZU $1.23
- FGM $0.19
- EZU Jun 15, 2026
- FGM Sep 24, 2026
- EZU Jun 18, 2026
- FGM Sep 30, 2026
- EZU Twice a year
- FGM Quarterly
Distribution history
EZU vs FGM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EZU
- FGM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EZU 13.9%, betterFGM 18.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- EZU 1.06, betterFGM 0.95
- Worst fall
- EZU −36.0%, betterFGM −48.3%
- Market sensitivity
- EZU 0.91FGM 1.16
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



