ONOF ranks 3rd and FFTY 17th of 20 funds in the Trend-Following / Tactical Index Category.
FFTY vs ONOF
ONOF −0.64pt a year
1.03%0.39%
FFTY 3.7×the volume
21.3K5.82K
ONOF +14.7pt
−7.3%+7.4%
FFTY vs ONOF Performance
−31.6%+42.6%
- FFTY 1.03%
- ONOF 0.39%, better
- FFTY $57M
- ONOF $140M
- FFTY −19.0%
- ONOF +7.7%, better
- FFTY 1.44%, better
- ONOF 1.22%
- FFTY 51
- ONOF 504
- FFTY 21.3K sh, better
- ONOF 5.82K sh
- FFTY $32.55
- ONOF $40.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FFTY | ONOF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | A95Higher |
| Mission | B62 | |
| Risk | F10 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | B55 | B59Higher |
| Holdings | A71 | A76Higher |
| Durability | B58Higher | B56 |
Rank among Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
Same Category. FFTY and ONOF are both graded against the same 20 Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FFTYD
ONOFA
In short
FFTY Investor's Business Daily's IBD 50 stock list, wrapped in a fund. A computer rescreens the growth leaders every week, and a market-signal rule can shift half the index into Treasury bills.
ONOF The ticker says it out loud: ONOF is an on/off switch. Four technical indicators decide whether it owns a broad basket of U.S. stocks or sits in short-term Treasuries. Rules, not hunches.
Stated mandate
FFTY The Fund aims to deliver the performance of the IBD 50 Index before fees and expenses.
ONOF ONOF seeks to track the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Risk Management Index before fees and expenses. Its four technical indicators shift the Fund between U.S. equities and defensive short-term Treasuries.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FFTY vs ONOF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FFTY vs ONOF Cost
Overpaying FFTY vs ONOF
$11,275
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FFTY 1.03%
$19,173
ONOF 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FFTY | ONOF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,814 | $705 | $1,109 |
| 20 | $6,807 | $2,725 | $4,082 |
| 30 | $19,173 | $7,898 | $11,275 |
- 1.03%FFTY
- 0.39%ONOF, cheaper
- Middle half of Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
- Median 0.67%
ONOF 2nd cheapest of 20 funds
FFTY 18th cheapest of 20 funds
FFTY vs ONOF Dividends
- FFTY 1.44%, better
- ONOF 1.22%
- FFTY $0.47
- ONOF $0.49
- FFTY $0.47
- ONOF $0.16
- FFTY Dec 31, 2025
- ONOF Jun 29, 2026
- FFTY Jan 2, 2026
- ONOF Jul 2, 2026
- FFTY Annual
- ONOF Twice a year
Distribution history
FFTY vs ONOF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FFTY
- ONOF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FFTY 29.0%ONOF 12.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FFTY 0.54ONOF 0.82, better
- Worst fall
- FFTY −59.4%ONOF −26.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FFTY 1.69ONOF 0.96
Popular comparisons
- 1.03% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.