FFUT ranks 4th and JPFP 4th of 14 funds in the Managed Futures Category.
FFUT vs JPFP
JPFP −0.21pt a year
0.80%0.59%
FFUT 7.0×the volume
43.3K6.22K
FFUT vs JPFP Performance
+3.6%+0.5%
- FFUT 0.80%
- JPFP 0.59%, better
- FFUT $394M
- JPFP $122M
- FFUT +20.9%
- JPFP
- FFUT 61
- JPFP 471
- FFUT 43.3K sh, better
- JPFP 6.22K sh
- FFUT $62.49
- JPFP $49.66
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FFUT | JPFP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B63 | A100Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A77Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | C46Higher | D25 |
| Holdings | F0 | |
| Durability | A73Higher | C45 |
Rank among Managed Futures funds
Same Category. FFUT and JPFP are both graded against the same 14 Managed Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FFUTB
JPFPB
In short
FFUT Fidelity's 2025 entry into managed futures: a systematic long-short model that rides price trends up or down across stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities. The fee sits at 0.80%, net of a waiver through May 31, 2027.
JPFP Most managed futures ETFs make you sell stocks to make room. JPFP stacks instead: full large-cap U.S. equity exposure plus an active long/short trend program across global equities, bonds, currencies and commodities, for 0.59%.
Stated mandate
FFUT The fund seeks to capitalize on market trends through a disciplined, systematic long-short strategy. The filing indicates that the portfolio may use broad-based ETFs and futures contracts to pursue return characteristics similar to the Managed Futures sector.
JPFP The fund seeks capital appreciation by combining an active managed futures strategy with a U.S. large-cap equity strategy in one investment. The managed-futures component uses derivatives for long or short exposure across global equities, fixed income, commodities, and currencies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FFUT vs JPFP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FFUT vs JPFP Cost
Overpaying FFUT vs JPFP
$3,711
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FFUT 0.80%
$15,346
JPFP 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FFUT | JPFP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,422 | $1,058 | $364 |
| 20 | $5,393 | $4,051 | $1,342 |
| 30 | $15,346 | $11,635 | $3,711 |
- 0.80%FFUT
- 0.59%JPFP, cheaper
- Middle half of Managed Futures funds
- Median 0.85%
JPFP cheapest of 14 funds
FFUT 5th cheapest of 14 funds
FFUT vs JPFP Dividends
- FFUT
- JPFP None
- FFUT $0.02
- JPFP
- FFUT Dec 30, 2025
- JPFP
- FFUT Jan 2, 2026
- JPFP
- FFUT Irregular
- JPFP
Distribution history
FFUT vs JPFP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FFUT 8.5%JPFP
- Return per unit of risk
- FFUT 1.70JPFP
- Worst fall
- FFUT −5.6%JPFP
- Market sensitivity
- FFUT 0.10JPFP 1.19
FFUT and JPFP in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.80% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.66%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.66%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


