WTMF ranks 2nd and JPFP 4th of 14 funds in the Managed Futures Category.
JPFP vs WTMF
JPFP −0.07pt a year
0.59%0.66%
WTMF 5.7×the volume
6.22K35.5K
JPFP vs WTMF Performance
+0.5%+4.0%
- JPFP 0.59%, better
- WTMF 0.66%
- JPFP $122M
- WTMF $264M
- JPFP
- WTMF +13.5%
- JPFP
- WTMF 7.87%
- JPFP 471
- WTMF 27
- JPFP 6.22K sh
- WTMF 35.5K sh, better
- JPFP $49.66
- WTMF $39.66
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JPFP | WTMF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | A90 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D37 | A72Higher |
| Tradability | D25 | C51Higher |
| Holdings | D36 | |
| Durability | C45 | A80Higher |
Rank among Managed Futures funds
Same Category. JPFP and WTMF are both graded against the same 14 Managed Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JPFPB
WTMFA
In short
JPFP Most managed futures ETFs make you sell stocks to make room. JPFP stacks instead: full large-cap U.S. equity exposure plus an active long/short trend program across global equities, bonds, currencies and commodities, for 0.59%.
WTMF A managed futures veteran. Trading since 2011, WTMF takes rules-based long and short positions across commodity, currency, equity and rate futures, aiming for returns with limited direct link to stocks or bonds.
Stated mandate
JPFP The fund seeks capital appreciation by combining an active managed futures strategy with a U.S. large-cap equity strategy in one investment. The managed-futures component uses derivatives for long or short exposure across global equities, fixed income, commodities, and currencies.
WTMF The Fund seeks positive total returns in rising or falling markets with limited direct correlation to broad equity or fixed-income returns. It uses a quantitative, rules-based approach with long and short futures positions across commodity, currency, equity, and interest-rate markets.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JPFP vs WTMF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JPFP vs WTMF Cost
Overpaying WTMF vs JPFP
$1,261
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JPFP 0.59%
$11,635
WTMF 0.66%
$12,896
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JPFP | WTMF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $1,180 | $122 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $4,504 | $453 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $12,896 | $1,261 |
- 0.59%JPFP, cheaper
- 0.66%WTMF
- Middle half of Managed Futures funds
- Median 0.85%
JPFP cheapest of 14 funds
WTMF 3rd cheapest of 14 funds
JPFP vs WTMF Dividends
- JPFP
- WTMF 7.87%
- JPFP None
- WTMF $3.14
- JPFP
- WTMF $2.81
- JPFP
- WTMF Oct 27, 2026
- JPFP
- WTMF Oct 29, 2026
- JPFP
- WTMF Annual
Distribution history
JPFP vs WTMF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JPFP WTMF 6.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- JPFP WTMF 0.98
- Worst fall
- JPFP WTMF −13.2%
- Market sensitivity
- JPFP 1.19WTMF 0.29
JPFP and WTMF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



