Skip to content

FFUT vs KMLM

Fidelity Managed Futures ETF

FFUTBNasdaq

KraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF

KMLMCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

FFUT −0.10pt a year

FFUT0.80%KMLM0.90%

Avg volume · 30D

KMLM 7.8×the volume

FFUT43.3KKMLM338K

FFUT vs KMLM Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+20.9%FFUT+20.7%KMLM

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. FFUT +20.9%. KMLM +20.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%10%25%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FFUT 0.80%, better
KMLM 0.90%
Fund size
FFUT $394M
KMLM $596M
1Y total return
FFUT +20.9%, better
KMLM +20.7%
Yield (12M)
FFUT No data
KMLM 4.25%
Holdings
FFUT 61
KMLM 8
Avg volume (30D)
FFUT 43.3K sh
KMLM 338K sh, better
NAV per share
FFUT $62.49
KMLM $30.70
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FFUT: Cost 63, Risk 77, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 0, Durability 73. KMLM: Cost 33, Risk 42, Mission not scored, Tradability 65, Holdings not scored, Durability 75.
Pillar letters and Scores for FFUT, KMLM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFFUTKMLM
Cost30% weightB63HigherD33
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA77HigherC42
Tradability15% weightC46B65Higher
Holdings10% weightF0Not scored
Durability5% weightA73A75Higher

Rank among Managed Futures funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FFUT and KMLM are both graded against the same 14 Managed Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Managed Futures⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

FFUT ranks 4th and KMLM 8th of 14 funds in the Managed Futures Category.

  1. Rank 1AIMFInvesco Managed Futures Strategy ETFScore 80
  2. Rank 2AWTMFWisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy FundScore 75
  3. Rank 3BISMFIshares Managed Futures Active ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BFFUTFidelity Managed Futures ETFScore 63
  5. Rank 4BJPFPJPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETFScore 63
  6. Rank 8BCTASimplify Managed Futures Strategy ETFScore 45
  7. Rank 8CKMLMKraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETFScore 45
  8. Rank 10CHOLDHarbor Alpha Layering ETF (HOLD)Score 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FFUTBFidelity Managed Futures ETF

KMLMCKraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF

In short

FFUT Fidelity's 2025 entry into managed futures: a systematic long-short model that rides price trends up or down across stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities. The fee sits at 0.80%, net of a waiver through May 31, 2027.

KMLM Trend following in its purest form: a rules-based index Mount Lucas has published since 1988, going long or short across commodities, currencies and global bonds. No stocks in the mix, by design.

Stated mandate

FFUT The fund seeks to capitalize on market trends through a disciplined, systematic long-short strategy. The filing indicates that the portfolio may use broad-based ETFs and futures contracts to pursue return characteristics similar to the Managed Futures sector.

KMLM The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price performance of the KFA MLM Index.

Why people hold it

  • FFUT Trend signals run both ways, so the fund can be short bonds or long gold with equal ease across equity, fixed income, currency and commodity markets.sec.gov
  • Commodity exposure runs through a wholly owned Cayman subsidiary, capped at 25% of assets, keeping it all inside a 1940 Act fund that sends a 1099, not a K-1.sec.gov
  • At 0.80% net of a waiver through May 31, 2027, the fee lands near the middle of a small managed futures field rather than at the premium end alternatives often occupy.
  • Returns come from trend signals rather than owning the market, which is why Fidelity pitches it as a diversifier alongside stocks and bonds.fidelity.com
  • KMLM Tracks the KFA MLM Index, a continuation of the MLM Index first published in 1988, so the rulebook comes with decades of live history rather than a backtest.kraneshares.comkraneshares.com 2
  • Long or short, set by rule: a daily signal compares each market's price to its long-term moving average, so the fund can be positioned short a falling market.kraneshares.com
  • About two dozen futures markets across commodities, currencies and global bonds, with the three baskets weighted by relative historical volatility and members equal-dollar weighted.kraneshares.comkraneshares.com 2
  • Trades futures but sends shareholders a 1099, not a K-1, keeping tax paperwork closer to an ordinary ETF.kraneshares.com

Worth knowing

  • FFUT Trades thinly, so bid-ask spreads can widen and larger orders may need patience.
  • Cheaper trend options exist: JPFP charges 0.59% with no waiver, WTMF 0.66% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026.
  • Launched in June 2025, so there is no multi-cycle record, and trend models can give back ground in choppy, directionless markets.
  • KMLM The 0.90% expense ratio buys the futures machinery and sits well above what plain index-tracking funds in its peer group charge.
  • Trend signals need sustained moves. Choppy, direction-free markets are the environment this mechanism handles worst.kraneshares.comkraneshares.com 2
  • It is a non-diversified commodity pool with no equity futures at all, so it moves on its own schedule instead of alongside a stock portfolio.kraneshares.comkraneshares.com 2

Full FFUT profile⁠

Full KMLM profile⁠

FFUT vs KMLM Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FFUT vs KMLM Cost

Overpaying KMLM vs FFUT

$1,694

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FFUT 0.80%

    $15,346

  • KMLM 0.90%

    $17,040

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FFUT 0.80%
  • KMLM 0.90%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530KMLM $17,040FFUT $15,346

Year by year

YearFFUTKMLMOverpaying
10$1,422$1,593$171
20$5,393$6,015$622
30$15,346$17,040$1,694

Expense ratio

  • 0.80%FFUT, cheaper
  • 0.90%KMLM
  • Middle half of Managed Futures funds
  • Median 0.85%

FFUT 5th cheapest of 14 funds

KMLM 9th cheapest of 14 funds

FFUT vs KMLM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FFUT No data
KMLM 4.25%
Payout (12M)
FFUT No data
KMLM $1.30
Last payment
FFUT $0.02
KMLM $1.30
Ex-dividend
FFUT Dec 30, 2025
KMLM Dec 22, 2025
Paid on
FFUT Jan 2, 2026
KMLM Dec 23, 2025
Frequency
FFUT Irregular
KMLM Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

FFUTIrregular · 2 paymentsAll FFUT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 19, 2025 $1.10; Dec 30, 2025 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5020232026YTD
KMLMAnnual · 4 paymentsAll KMLM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 29, 2021 $1.84; Dec 28, 2022 $4.04; Dec 17, 2024 $0.23; Dec 22, 2025 $1.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5020232026YTD

FFUT vs KMLM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FFUT 8.5%since Jul 2025KMLM 10.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FFUT 1.70since Jul 2025KMLM −0.35
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FFUT −5.6%since Jun 2025KMLM −27.6%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FFUT 0.10KMLM −0.26

FFUT and KMLM in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FFUTBvsIMFA

    Fidelity Managed Futures ETF · Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KMLMCvsIMFA

    KraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF · Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FFUTBvsWTMFA

    Fidelity Managed Futures ETF · WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.66%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KMLMCvsWTMFA

    KraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF · WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.66%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FFUTBvsISMFB

    Fidelity Managed Futures ETF · Ishares Managed Futures Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.80%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KMLMCvsISMFB

    KraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF · Ishares Managed Futures Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.80%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.