FFUT ranks 4th and KMLM 8th of 14 funds in the Managed Futures Category.
FFUT vs KMLM
FFUT −0.10pt a year
0.80%0.90%
KMLM 7.8×the volume
43.3K338K
FFUT vs KMLM Performance
+20.9%+20.7%
- FFUT 0.80%, better
- KMLM 0.90%
- FFUT $394M
- KMLM $596M
- FFUT +20.9%, better
- KMLM +20.7%
- FFUT
- KMLM 4.25%
- FFUT 61
- KMLM 8
- FFUT 43.3K sh
- KMLM 338K sh, better
- FFUT $62.49
- KMLM $30.70
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FFUT | KMLM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B63Higher | D33 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A77Higher | C42 |
| Tradability | C46 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | F0 | |
| Durability | A73 | A75Higher |
Rank among Managed Futures funds
Same Category. FFUT and KMLM are both graded against the same 14 Managed Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FFUTB
KMLMC
In short
FFUT Fidelity's 2025 entry into managed futures: a systematic long-short model that rides price trends up or down across stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities. The fee sits at 0.80%, net of a waiver through May 31, 2027.
KMLM Trend following in its purest form: a rules-based index Mount Lucas has published since 1988, going long or short across commodities, currencies and global bonds. No stocks in the mix, by design.
Stated mandate
FFUT The fund seeks to capitalize on market trends through a disciplined, systematic long-short strategy. The filing indicates that the portfolio may use broad-based ETFs and futures contracts to pursue return characteristics similar to the Managed Futures sector.
KMLM The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price performance of the KFA MLM Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FFUT vs KMLM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FFUT vs KMLM Cost
Overpaying KMLM vs FFUT
$1,694
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FFUT 0.80%
$15,346
KMLM 0.90%
$17,040
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FFUT | KMLM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,422 | $1,593 | $171 |
| 20 | $5,393 | $6,015 | $622 |
| 30 | $15,346 | $17,040 | $1,694 |
- 0.80%FFUT, cheaper
- 0.90%KMLM
- Middle half of Managed Futures funds
- Median 0.85%
FFUT 5th cheapest of 14 funds
KMLM 9th cheapest of 14 funds
FFUT vs KMLM Dividends
- FFUT
- KMLM 4.25%
- FFUT
- KMLM $1.30
- FFUT $0.02
- KMLM $1.30
- FFUT Dec 30, 2025
- KMLM Dec 22, 2025
- FFUT Jan 2, 2026
- KMLM Dec 23, 2025
- FFUT Irregular
- KMLM Annual
Distribution history
FFUT vs KMLM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FFUT 8.5%KMLM 10.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- FFUT 1.70KMLM −0.35
- Worst fall
- FFUT −5.6%KMLM −27.6%
- Market sensitivity
- FFUT 0.10KMLM −0.26
FFUT and KMLM in the news



Price vs Value
URNJ closed 1.57% below the value of its miners Friday



Popular comparisons
- 0.80% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.66%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.66%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.