Skip to content

FGDL vs IAU

Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF

FGDLBNYSE Arca

iShares Gold Trust

IAUBNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

FGDL −0.10pt a year

FGDL 0.15%IAU 0.25%

Avg volume · 30D

IAU 308.4×the volume

FGDL 18.4KIAU 5.68M

3Y return · a year

FGDL +0.2pt

FGDL +29.1%IAU +28.9%

FGDL vs IAU Performance

Oct 13, 2025 – Oct 13, 2026

+0.8%FGDL+1.1%IAU

Oct 13, 2025 to Oct 13, 2026. FGDL +0.8%. IAU +1.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.10%20%30%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FGDL 0.15%, better
IAU 0.25%
Fund size
FGDL $433M
IAU $62.1B
1Y total return
FGDL +0.8%
IAU +1.1%, better
Holdings
FGDL 1
IAU 1
Avg volume (30D)
FGDL 18.4K sh
IAU 5.68M sh, better
NAV per share
FGDL $55.48
IAU $78.36
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FGDL: Cost 77, Risk 49, Mission 100, Tradability 23, Holdings not scored, Durability 32. IAU: Cost 26, Risk 49, Mission 100, Tradability 54, Holdings not scored, Durability 82.
Pillar letters and Scores for FGDL, IAU, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFGDLIAU
Cost30% weightA77HigherD26
Mission25% weightA100A100
Risk15% weightC49C49
Tradability15% weightF23C54Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightD32A82Higher

Rank among Physical Gold funds

Same Category. FGDL and IAU are both graded against the same 10 Physical Gold funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Physical Gold⁠

Category · 10 funds
See all 10 ›

FGDL ranks 3rd and IAU 7th of 10 funds in the Physical Gold Category.

  1. Rank 1AGLDMSPDR Gold MiniShares TrustScore 81
  2. Rank 2AIAUMiShares Gold Trust MicroScore 77
  3. Rank 3BFGDLFranklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETFScore 67
  4. Rank 4BSGOLabrdn Physical Gold Shares ETFScore 66
  5. Rank 5BBARGraniteShares Gold TrustScore 65
  6. Rank 7BIAUiShares Gold TrustScore 58
  7. Rank 7BOUNZVanEck Merk Gold ETFScore 58

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FGDLBFranklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF

IAUBiShares Gold Trust

In short

FGDL Gold in a vault, with two twists: the bars come with Franklin's responsible-sourcing label, and the fund charges nothing to hold them. Assets are bullion and cash, full stop.

IAU Gold bars in a London vault, wrapped in a ticker since 2005. IAU is the veteran heavyweight of physical gold funds: bullion held by a custodian bank, priced off the London gold benchmark, tradable all day.

Stated mandate

FGDL The Fund seeks to track the price of gold bullion, after deducting expenses. Its assets consist only of gold bullion and cash, if any.

IAU The Trust seeks to reflect the price of gold bullion, after accounting for its expenses and liabilities. It provides exposure to physical gold.

Why people hold it

  • FGDL A 0.00% expense ratio in a cohort whose median is 0.17%. Even the cheap giants charge something (GLDM 0.10%, IAUM 0.09%, GLD 0.40%).
  • Simple plumbing: a grantor trust that holds gold bullion and cash and tracks the metal's price after expenses. No futures, no swaps, no miners.
  • The responsible-sourcing standard is the pitch in a group where every fund owns the same metal, and Franklin spells it out in the trust's own filings.
  • Does what it says: mandate, wrapper and holdings all line up, and it sits in the upper half of the physical gold cohort.
  • IAU A twenty-year paper trail. Launched in 2005, with bullion held by JPMorgan Chase Bank's London branch and two decades of SEC filings anyone can read.sec.gov
  • No futures, no swaps, no roll mechanics. Each share is a fractional undivided interest in gold the trust actually holds, marked to the LBMA gold price.sec.gov
  • Costs less than the original US gold ETF: 0.25% a year against GLD's 0.40%. It's also one of the most actively traded funds in the physical gold group.
  • Simple mandate, cleanly executed: the trust aims to reflect the gold price minus its expenses, and it has tracked that job about as closely as the structure allows.

Worth knowing

  • FGDL Thinly traded next to the category's heavyweights, which can mean wider bid/ask spreads on the way in and out.
  • Bullion pays no income, and the fund makes no distributions. The gold price, less costs, is the whole story.
  • Launched in 2022 and far smaller than the decade-old gold trusts, so the track record is short by cohort standards.
  • IAU Fees sit above the cohort median (0.25% vs 0.17%). iShares sells a micro version of the same exposure, IAUM, at 0.09%, and GLDM charges 0.10%.
  • The trust earns no income, so it sells gold to pay the sponsor's fee. The gold behind each share declines over time, and shareholders get no distributions.sec.gov
  • Tax wrinkle: gains on a trust holding gold are treated as collectibles gains, which can carry a higher top long-term rate than most stock gains.sec.gov

Full FGDL profile⁠

Full IAU profile⁠

FGDL vs IAU Holdings

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Only FGDL
1
of 1
In both
0
holdings
Only IAU
1
of 1

Holdings side by side

Top 10 holdings by combined weight
HoldingFGDLIAU
Gold Oz.Gold Oz.100.02%Not held
Physical GoldPhysical GoldNot held100.00%

All 2 FGDL holdings⁠All IAU holdings⁠

FGDL vs IAU Cost

Expense ratio

  • 0.15%FGDL, cheaper
  • 0.25%IAU
  • Middle half of Physical Gold funds
  • Median 0.17%

2 of 10 Physical Gold funds charge less than FGDL

7 of 10 charge less than IAU

$2,022less in fees with FGDL over 30 years, on $10,000 invested

$0$1,000$2,000$3,000$4,000$5,000$6,000Start10 years20 years30 years

Assumes $10,000 invested once and 7% growth a year before fees.

FGDL vs IAU Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 13, 2026
Payout (12M)
FGDL: None
IAU: None

Distribution history

FGDLAll FGDL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

IAUAll IAU payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FGDL vs IAU Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FGDL 19.1%IAU 18.9%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FGDL 1.28IAU 1.28=
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FGDL −26.6%since Jun 2022IAU −26.4%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 3 years
FGDL 0.41IAU 0.41=

FGDL and IAU in the news

Popular comparisons