Skip to content

FHLC vs IXJ

Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF

FHLCANYSE Arca

iShares Global Healthcare ETF

IXJBNYSE Arca

Overlap

70.1%by weight

Expense ratio

FHLC −0.30pt a year

FHLC0.08%IXJ0.38%

Avg volume · 30D

FHLC 1.03×the volume

FHLC246KIXJ240K

10Y return · a year

FHLC +1.6pt

FHLC+12.4%IXJ+10.8%

FHLC vs IXJ Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+42.8%FHLC+38.3%IXJ

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. FHLC +42.8%. IXJ +38.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%0%10%20%30%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FHLC 0.08%, better
IXJ 0.38%
Fund size
FHLC $3.54B
IXJ $4.65B
1Y total return
FHLC +28.9%, better
IXJ +25.5%
Yield (12M)
FHLC 1.15%
IXJ 1.28%, better
Holdings
FHLC 345
IXJ 123
Avg volume (30D)
FHLC 246K sh, better
IXJ 240K sh
NAV per share
FHLC $88.53
IXJ $112.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FHLC: Cost 98, Risk 79, Mission 81, Tradability 82, Holdings 54, Durability 77. IXJ: Cost 69, Risk 73, Mission not scored, Tradability 66, Holdings 66, Durability 88.
Pillar letters and Scores for FHLC, IXJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFHLCIXJ
Cost30% weightA98HigherB69
Mission25% weightA81Not scored
Risk15% weightA79HigherA73
Tradability15% weightA82HigherB66
Holdings10% weightC54B66Higher
Durability5% weightA77A88Higher

Rank among Health Care (Broad) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FHLC and IXJ are both graded against the same 25 Health Care (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Health Care (Broad)⁠

Category · 25 funds
See all 25 ›

FHLC ranks 2nd and IXJ 6th of 25 funds in the Health Care (Broad) Category.

  1. Rank 1AXLVState Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETFScore 85
  2. Rank 2AFHLCFidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETFScore 83
  3. Rank 3AVHTVanguard Health Care ETFScore 77
  4. Rank 5AIYHiShares U.S. Healthcare ETFScore 71
  5. Rank 6BIXJiShares Global Healthcare ETFScore 69
  6. Rank 7BRSPHInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETFScore 68

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FHLCAFidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF

IXJBiShares Global Healthcare ETF

In short

FHLC Health care, whole market. FHLC tracks an MSCI index that runs from mega-cap pharma down to small-cap biotech and device makers, roughly 400 names, for 0.08% a year.

IXJ Most healthcare sector funds stop at the US border. IXJ tracks a global index instead: roughly 110 drugmakers, biotechs and device makers worldwide, and it has been doing it since 2001.

Stated mandate

FHLC The fund seeks to track the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index before fees and expenses.

IXJ The fund seeks to track an index of global healthcare-sector equities, offering diversified access to pharmaceutical, biotech, and medical-device companies worldwide.

Why people hold it

  • FHLC Charges 0.08% a year against a 0.50% median for broad health care ETFs. Only XLV matches that sticker; VHT sits a hair above.
  • The IMI index it follows reaches for about 99% of US free-float market value, so smaller biotech and device names ride along with the pharma giants.msci.com
  • Mirrors its benchmark closely, one of the tighter tracking jobs among broad health care funds. Distributions come quarterly.
  • Fidelity has run it since 2013, and it has grown into a multi-billion-dollar fund with a plain vanilla index mandate.fidelity.com
  • IXJ Global by charter. It tracks S&P's capped global health care index, so companies listed outside the US sit in the same basket as the American giants.ishares.com
  • 0.38% a year, below the median fee in its broad healthcare peer group, for a portfolio of about 110 pharma, biotech and medical-device names.
  • The word capped in the index name does real work: it limits how large any single mega-cap drugmaker can grow inside the fund.ishares.com
  • Running since 2001 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund. That is a long operating record, not a launch-and-see product.

Worth knowing

  • FHLC One sector, one country. Drug-pricing politics, patent cliffs and FDA rulings move the whole portfolio at once.
  • Free-float cap weighting means a handful of mega-cap insurers and drugmakers carry most of the weight; that long tail of small names counts for less than it looks.msci.com
  • Moderately traded rather than the category's volume leader, so spreads matter more on large or hurried orders.
  • IXJ The worldwide reach carries a price tag: peers XLV and FHLC (0.08%) and VHT (0.09%) charge a fraction of IXJ's 0.38%.
  • One sector, one storyline. Patent cliffs, trial data and drug-pricing politics tend to move the whole basket at once.
  • Trading is moderate rather than heavy, so bid-ask spreads are worth a glance on larger orders.

Full FHLC profile⁠

Full IXJ profile⁠

FHLC vs IXJ Holdings

How FHLC and IXJ differ

Overlap by weight

70.1%

Shared holdings make up 82.6% of FHLC and 70.1% of IXJ.

Level by level

  • Holdings57 in both70.1%
  • Countryby domicile74.5%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Sector1 Sector100%

Sector

Sector weights in FHLC and IXJ, widest gap first
SectorMore in FHLCMore in IXJ
Health CareSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in FHLC and IXJ, widest gap first
CountryMore in FHLCMore in IXJ
United StatesFHLC +25.4 points
SwitzerlandIXJ +9.7 points
United KingdomIXJ +4.5 points
JapanIXJ +3.6 points
FranceIXJ +1.9 points
DenmarkIXJ +1.9 points
GermanyIXJ +1.6 points
BelgiumIXJ +1.1 points
Other countries (3)IXJ +0.9 points

Outside the US: IXJ 100% developed, 0% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • FHLC52.6%
  • IXJ48.2%

Securities held

  • FHLC343
  • IXJ109

Asset class

FHLC
Equity
IXJ
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in FHLC286
  • In both57
  • Only in IXJ52

Only in FHLC

286 securities, 18.2% of FHLC by weight

  • Medtronic PLC1.60%
  • Elevance Health Inc1.18%
  • Securities Lending Cf0.93%

Only in IXJ

52 securities, 29.5% of IXJ by weight

  • Roche Ps Par AG3.88%
  • Novartis AG3.36%
  • Astrazeneca PLC3.27%

Weight gaps

All 57 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in FHLC and IXJ, widest gap first
HoldingMore in FHLCMore in IXJ
Eli Lilly & CoLLYFHLC +2.54 points
Johnson & JohnsonJNJFHLC +1.79 points
AbbVie IncABBVFHLC +1.28 points
UnitedHealth Group IncUNHFHLC +0.69 points
Merck & Co Inc NewMRKFHLC +0.51 points
Thermo Fisher Scientific IncTMOFHLC +0.49 points
Amgen IncAMGNFHLC +0.36 points
Intuitive Surgical IncISRGFHLC +0.33 points

All 365 FHLC holdings⁠All 109 IXJ holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FHLC vs IXJ Cost

Overpaying IXJ vs FHLC

$5,933

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FHLC 0.084%

    $1,773

  • IXJ 0.38%

    $7,706

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FHLC 0.084%
  • IXJ 0.38%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530IXJ $7,706FHLC $1,773

Year by year

YearFHLCIXJOverpaying
10$154$688$534
20$603$2,658$2,055
30$1,773$7,706$5,933

Expense ratio

  • 0.08%FHLC, cheaper
  • 0.38%IXJ
  • Middle half of Health Care (Broad) funds
  • Median 0.50%

FHLC 2nd cheapest of 25 funds

IXJ 10th cheapest of 25 funds

FHLC vs IXJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FHLC 1.15%
IXJ 1.28%, better
Payout (12M)
FHLC $1.02
IXJ $1.44
Last payment
FHLC $0.25
IXJ $0.85
Ex-dividend
FHLC Sep 18, 2026
IXJ Jun 15, 2026
Paid on
FHLC Sep 22, 2026
IXJ Jun 18, 2026
Frequency
FHLC Quarterly
IXJ Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FHLCQuarterly · 40 paymentsAll FHLC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 40 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.13; Jun 16, 2017 $0.14; Sep 15, 2017 $0.13; Dec 15, 2017 $0.16; Mar 16, 2018 $0.13; Jun 15, 2018 $0.15; Sep 21, 2018 $0.14; Dec 21, 2018 $0.15; Dec 28, 2018 $0.32; Mar 15, 2019 $0.16; Jun 21, 2019 $0.16; Sep 20, 2019 $0.17; Dec 20, 2019 $0.09; Mar 20, 2020 $0.25; Jun 19, 2020 $0.17; Sep 18, 2020 $0.18; Dec 18, 2020 $0.23; Mar 19, 2021 $0.20; Jun 18, 2021 $0.18; Sep 17, 2021 $0.19; Dec 17, 2021 $0.22; Mar 18, 2022 $0.22; Jun 17, 2022 $0.20; Sep 16, 2022 $0.22; Dec 16, 2022 $0.19; Mar 17, 2023 $0.23; Jun 16, 2023 $0.23; Sep 15, 2023 $0.22; Dec 15, 2023 $0.22; Mar 15, 2024 $0.24; Jun 21, 2024 $0.24; Sep 20, 2024 $0.25; Dec 20, 2024 $0.26; Mar 21, 2025 $0.25; Jun 20, 2025 $0.26; Sep 19, 2025 $0.26; Dec 19, 2025 $0.27; Mar 20, 2026 $0.23; Jun 18, 2026 $0.26; Sep 18, 2026 $0.25. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
IXJTwice a year · 20 paymentsAll IXJ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 20 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2017 $0.49; Dec 21, 2017 $0.33; Jun 19, 2018 $0.52; Dec 18, 2018 $0.35; Dec 28, 2018 $0.33; Jun 17, 2019 $0.50; Dec 16, 2019 $0.48; Jun 15, 2020 $0.53; Dec 14, 2020 $0.44; Jun 10, 2021 $0.53; Dec 13, 2021 $0.48; Jun 9, 2022 $0.55; Dec 13, 2022 $0.44; Jun 7, 2023 $0.64; Dec 20, 2023 $0.56; Jun 11, 2024 $0.67; Dec 17, 2024 $0.62; Jun 16, 2025 $0.76; Dec 16, 2025 $0.60; Jun 15, 2026 $0.85. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

FHLC vs IXJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FHLC
  • IXJ
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: FHLC −17.7% · Jun 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FHLC 14.5%IXJ 14.2%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FHLC 0.83, betterIXJ 0.69
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FHLC −17.7%, betterIXJ −18.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FHLC 0.59IXJ 0.55

FHLC and IXJ in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FHLCAvsXLVA

    Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF · State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IXJBvsXLVA

    iShares Global Healthcare ETF · State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.38% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FHLCAvsVHTA

    Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF · Vanguard Health Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IXJBvsVHTA

    iShares Global Healthcare ETF · Vanguard Health Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.38% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FHLCAvsXHSA

    Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IXJBvsXHSA

    iShares Global Healthcare ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.38% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.