FHLC ranks 2nd and KURE 23rd of 25 funds in the Health Care (Broad) Category.
FHLC vs KURE
FHLC −0.57pt a year
0.08%0.65%
FHLC 3.0×the volume
246K80.8K
FHLC +16.4pt
+7.1%−9.3%
FHLC vs KURE Performance
+41.1%−38.5%
- FHLC 0.08%, better
- KURE 0.65%
- FHLC $3.54B
- KURE $108M
- FHLC +28.5%, better
- KURE −6.6%
- FHLC 1.15%
- KURE 4.12%, better
- FHLC 344
- KURE 44
- FHLC 246K sh, better
- KURE 80.8K sh
- FHLC $88.53
- KURE $17.55
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FHLC | KURE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98Higher | D27 |
| Mission | A81 | |
| Risk | A79Higher | F9 |
| Tradability | A79Higher | F24 |
| Holdings | C54Higher | C52 |
| Durability | A77Higher | D36 |
Rank among Health Care (Broad) funds
Same Category. FHLC and KURE are both graded against the same 25 Health Care (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FHLCA
KURED
In short
FHLC Health care, whole market. FHLC tracks an MSCI index that runs from mega-cap pharma down to small-cap biotech and device makers, roughly 400 names, for 0.08% a year.
KURE The US-listed route into China's health care sector in one ticker: about 50 Chinese pharma and medical names listed in the Mainland, Hong Kong and the US. A narrow, volatile slice of a huge market, not a broad pharma fund.
Stated mandate
FHLC The fund seeks to track the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index before fees and expenses.
KURE KURE is designed to track the MSCI China All Shares Healthcare 10/40 Index, which represents Chinese companies engaged in the healthcare sector.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FHLC vs KURE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FHLC vs KURE Cost
Overpaying KURE vs FHLC
$10,944
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FHLC 0.084%
$1,773
KURE 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FHLC | KURE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $154 | $1,163 | $1,009 |
| 20 | $603 | $4,440 | $3,837 |
| 30 | $1,773 | $12,717 | $10,944 |
- 0.08%FHLC, cheaper
- 0.65%KURE
- Middle half of Health Care (Broad) funds
- Median 0.50%
FHLC 2nd cheapest of 25 funds
KURE 18th cheapest of 25 funds
FHLC vs KURE Dividends
- FHLC 1.15%
- KURE 4.12%, better
- FHLC $1.02
- KURE $0.71
- FHLC $0.25
- KURE $0.71
- FHLC Sep 18, 2026
- KURE Dec 22, 2025
- FHLC Sep 22, 2026
- KURE Dec 23, 2025
- FHLC Quarterly
- KURE Annual
Distribution history
FHLC vs KURE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FHLC
- KURE
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FHLC 14.5%, betterKURE 26.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- FHLC 0.83, betterKURE −0.02
- Worst fall
- FHLC −17.7%, betterKURE −58.6%
- Market sensitivity
- FHLC 0.59KURE 0.30
FHLC and KURE in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
