Skip to content

FHLC vs KURE

Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF

FHLCANYSE Arca

KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF

KUREDNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

FHLC −0.57pt a year

FHLC0.08%KURE0.65%

Avg volume · 30D

FHLC 3.0×the volume

FHLC246KKURE80.8K

5Y return · a year

FHLC +16.4pt

FHLC+7.1%KURE−9.3%

FHLC vs KURE Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

+41.1%FHLC−38.5%KURE

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. FHLC +41.1%. KURE −38.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−20%0%20%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
FHLC 0.08%, better
KURE 0.65%
Fund size
FHLC $3.54B
KURE $108M
1Y total return
FHLC +28.5%, better
KURE −6.6%
Yield (12M)
FHLC 1.15%
KURE 4.12%, better
Holdings
FHLC 344
KURE 44
Avg volume (30D)
FHLC 246K sh, better
KURE 80.8K sh
NAV per share
FHLC $88.53
KURE $17.55
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FHLC: Cost 98, Risk 79, Mission 81, Tradability 79, Holdings 54, Durability 77. KURE: Cost 27, Risk 9, Mission not scored, Tradability 24, Holdings 52, Durability 36.
Pillar letters and Scores for FHLC, KURE, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFHLCKURE
Cost30% weightA98HigherD27
Mission25% weightA81Not scored
Risk15% weightA79HigherF9
Tradability15% weightA79HigherF24
Holdings10% weightC54HigherC52
Durability5% weightA77HigherD36

Rank among Health Care (Broad) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FHLC and KURE are both graded against the same 25 Health Care (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Health Care (Broad)⁠

Category · 25 funds
See all 25 ›

FHLC ranks 2nd and KURE 23rd of 25 funds in the Health Care (Broad) Category.

  1. Rank 1AXLVState Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETFScore 85
  2. Rank 2AFHLCFidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETFScore 83
  3. Rank 3AVHTVanguard Health Care ETFScore 77
  4. Rank 22DMDEVFirst Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETFScore 27
  5. Rank 23DKUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETFScore 26
  6. Rank 24DGDOCGoldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETFScore 25

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FHLCAFidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF

KUREDKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF

In short

FHLC Health care, whole market. FHLC tracks an MSCI index that runs from mega-cap pharma down to small-cap biotech and device makers, roughly 400 names, for 0.08% a year.

KURE The US-listed route into China's health care sector in one ticker: about 50 Chinese pharma and medical names listed in the Mainland, Hong Kong and the US. A narrow, volatile slice of a huge market, not a broad pharma fund.

Stated mandate

FHLC The fund seeks to track the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index before fees and expenses.

KURE KURE is designed to track the MSCI China All Shares Healthcare 10/40 Index, which represents Chinese companies engaged in the healthcare sector.

Why people hold it

  • FHLC Charges 0.08% a year against a 0.50% median for broad health care ETFs. Only XLV matches that sticker; VHT sits a hair above.
  • The IMI index it follows reaches for about 99% of US free-float market value, so smaller biotech and device names ride along with the pharma giants.msci.com
  • Mirrors its benchmark closely, one of the tighter tracking jobs among broad health care funds. Distributions come quarterly.
  • Fidelity has run it since 2013, and it has grown into a multi-billion-dollar fund with a plain vanilla index mandate.fidelity.com
  • KURE One ticker spans Chinese health care across all three venues it trades in: Mainland A-shares, Hong Kong and US listings. Most funds in this category stop at US pharma.kraneshares.com
  • Rules-based mandate, not a manager's China hunch: it tracks a published MSCI China health care benchmark and has been listed since 2018.sec.gov
  • About 50 holdings keeps it a pure China health care basket, with no US mega-cap pharma diluting the exposure.

Worth knowing

  • FHLC One sector, one country. Drug-pricing politics, patent cliffs and FDA rulings move the whole portfolio at once.
  • Free-float cap weighting means a handful of mega-cap insurers and drugmakers carry most of the weight; that long tail of small names counts for less than it looks.msci.com
  • Moderately traded rather than the category's volume leader, so spreads matter more on large or hurried orders.
  • KURE Costs 0.65% net of a waiver through August 1, 2028 (0.79% gross), above the health care category median. Broad US sector funds like XLV (0.08%) and VHT (0.09%) sit a tier below.
  • Single-country, single-sector, about 50 names: swings have run among the widest in its health care peer group, and Chinese policy shifts can move the whole basket.sec.gov
  • Moderately traded rather than a category heavyweight, so spreads and order type matter more. Distributions come once or twice a year, not monthly.

Full FHLC profile⁠

Full KURE profile⁠

FHLC vs KURE Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FHLC vs KURE Cost

Overpaying KURE vs FHLC

$10,944

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FHLC 0.084%

    $1,773

  • KURE 0.65%

    $12,717

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FHLC 0.084%
  • KURE 0.65%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530KURE $12,717FHLC $1,773

Year by year

YearFHLCKUREOverpaying
10$154$1,163$1,009
20$603$4,440$3,837
30$1,773$12,717$10,944

Expense ratio

  • 0.08%FHLC, cheaper
  • 0.65%KURE
  • Middle half of Health Care (Broad) funds
  • Median 0.50%

FHLC 2nd cheapest of 25 funds

KURE 18th cheapest of 25 funds

FHLC vs KURE Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
FHLC 1.15%
KURE 4.12%, better
Payout (12M)
FHLC $1.02
KURE $0.71
Last payment
FHLC $0.25
KURE $0.71
Ex-dividend
FHLC Sep 18, 2026
KURE Dec 22, 2025
Paid on
FHLC Sep 22, 2026
KURE Dec 23, 2025
Frequency
FHLC Quarterly
KURE Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FHLCQuarterly · 40 paymentsAll FHLC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 40 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.13; Jun 16, 2017 $0.14; Sep 15, 2017 $0.13; Dec 15, 2017 $0.16; Mar 16, 2018 $0.13; Jun 15, 2018 $0.15; Sep 21, 2018 $0.14; Dec 21, 2018 $0.15; Dec 28, 2018 $0.32; Mar 15, 2019 $0.16; Jun 21, 2019 $0.16; Sep 20, 2019 $0.17; Dec 20, 2019 $0.09; Mar 20, 2020 $0.25; Jun 19, 2020 $0.17; Sep 18, 2020 $0.18; Dec 18, 2020 $0.23; Mar 19, 2021 $0.20; Jun 18, 2021 $0.18; Sep 17, 2021 $0.19; Dec 17, 2021 $0.22; Mar 18, 2022 $0.22; Jun 17, 2022 $0.20; Sep 16, 2022 $0.22; Dec 16, 2022 $0.19; Mar 17, 2023 $0.23; Jun 16, 2023 $0.23; Sep 15, 2023 $0.22; Dec 15, 2023 $0.22; Mar 15, 2024 $0.24; Jun 21, 2024 $0.24; Sep 20, 2024 $0.25; Dec 20, 2024 $0.26; Mar 21, 2025 $0.25; Jun 20, 2025 $0.26; Sep 19, 2025 $0.26; Dec 19, 2025 $0.27; Mar 20, 2026 $0.23; Jun 18, 2026 $0.26; Sep 18, 2026 $0.25. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD
KUREAnnual · 8 paymentsAll KURE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 8 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 26, 2018 $0.08; Dec 27, 2019 $0.06; Dec 29, 2020 $0.00011; Dec 29, 2021 $4.05; Dec 28, 2022 $0.01; Dec 18, 2023 $0.11; Dec 17, 2024 $0.18; Dec 22, 2025 $0.71. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD

FHLC vs KURE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FHLC
  • KURE
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: KURE −58.6% · Jul 2024. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%−20%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FHLC 14.5%, betterKURE 26.5%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FHLC 0.83, betterKURE −0.02
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FHLC −17.7%, betterKURE −58.6%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FHLC 0.59KURE 0.30

FHLC and KURE in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FHLCAvsXLVA

    Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF · State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KUREDvsXLVA

    KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF · State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FHLCAvsVHTA

    Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF · Vanguard Health Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KUREDvsVHTA

    KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF · Vanguard Health Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FHLCAvsXHSA

    Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KUREDvsXHSA

    KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.