NOBL ranks 2nd and FID 7th of 7 funds in the Dividend Aristocrats Category.
FID vs NOBL
NOBL −0.25pt a year
0.60%0.35%
NOBL 69.9×the volume
15.5K1.08M
NOBL +3.3pt
+7.6%+10.9%
FID vs NOBL Performance
+56.2%+40.1%
- FID 0.60%
- NOBL 0.35%, better
- FID $170M
- NOBL $11.9B
- FID +19.0%
- NOBL +19.0%
- FID 3.96%, better
- NOBL 1.98%
- FID 77
- NOBL 69
- FID 15.5K sh
- NOBL 1.08M sh, better
- FID $22.46
- NOBL $59.15
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FID | NOBL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | B65Higher |
| Mission | C45 | A88Higher |
| Risk | A72Higher | C41 |
| Tradability | D26 | A87Higher |
| Holdings | C41 | B67Higher |
| Durability | B59 | B69Higher |
Rank among Dividend Aristocrats funds
Same Category. FID and NOBL are both graded against the same 7 Dividend Aristocrats funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FIDD
NOBLA
In short
FID The Aristocrats formula with a passport. FID applies S&P's long dividend-record discipline to companies outside the US, holding roughly 80 international payers in one index fund and paying cash out quarterly.
NOBL Dividend investing without the yield chase. NOBL holds roughly 70 S&P 500 companies picked for their records as dividend growers, not for the fattest payout on the screen. A purist's take on the theme, running since 2013.
Stated mandate
FID The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index by investing principally in the securities comprising that Index.
NOBL The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FID vs NOBL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FID vs NOBL Cost
Overpaying FID vs NOBL
$4,691
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FID 0.60%
$11,817
NOBL 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FID | NOBL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $634 | $442 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $2,454 | $1,662 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $7,126 | $4,691 |
- 0.60%FID
- 0.35%NOBL, cheaper
- Middle half of Dividend Aristocrats funds
- Median 0.40%
NOBL 2nd cheapest of 7 funds
FID 7th cheapest of 7 funds
FID vs NOBL Dividends
- FID 3.96%, better
- NOBL 1.98%
- FID $0.89
- NOBL $1.17
- FID $0.16
- NOBL $0.28
- FID Sep 24, 2026
- NOBL Sep 23, 2026
- FID Sep 30, 2026
- NOBL Sep 29, 2026
- FID Quarterly
- NOBL Quarterly
Distribution history
FID vs NOBL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FID
- NOBL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FID 11.2%, betterNOBL 13.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- FID 1.40, betterNOBL 0.70
- Worst fall
- FID −29.1%NOBL −17.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FID 0.75NOBL 0.64
FID and NOBL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

