Skip to content

FID vs NOBL

First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF

FIDDNasdaq

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

NOBLACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

NOBL −0.25pt a year

FID0.60%NOBL0.35%

Avg volume · 30D

NOBL 69.9×the volume

FID15.5KNOBL1.08M

10Y return · a year

NOBL +3.3pt

FID+7.6%NOBL+10.9%

FID vs NOBL Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+56.2%FID+40.1%NOBL

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. FID +56.2%. NOBL +40.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FID 0.60%
NOBL 0.35%, better
Fund size
FID $170M
NOBL $11.9B
1Y total return
FID +19.0%
NOBL +19.0%
Yield (12M)
FID 3.96%, better
NOBL 1.98%
Holdings
FID 77
NOBL 69
Avg volume (30D)
FID 15.5K sh
NOBL 1.08M sh, better
NAV per share
FID $22.46
NOBL $59.15
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FID: Cost 11, Risk 72, Mission 45, Tradability 26, Holdings 41, Durability 59. NOBL: Cost 65, Risk 41, Mission 88, Tradability 87, Holdings 67, Durability 69.
Pillar letters and Scores for FID, NOBL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFIDNOBL
Cost30% weightF11B65Higher
Mission25% weightC45A88Higher
Risk15% weightA72HigherC41
Tradability15% weightD26A87Higher
Holdings10% weightC41B67Higher
Durability5% weightB59B69Higher

Rank among Dividend Aristocrats funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FID and NOBL are both graded against the same 7 Dividend Aristocrats funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Dividend Aristocrats⁠

Category · 7 funds
See all 7 ›

NOBL ranks 2nd and FID 7th of 7 funds in the Dividend Aristocrats Category.

  1. Rank 1ASDYState Street SPDR S&P Dividend ETFScore 75
  2. Rank 2ANOBLProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 3BREGLProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 6CSNPDXtrackers S&P Dividend Aristocrats Screened ETFScore 40
  5. Rank 7DFIDFirst Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETFScore 36

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FIDDFirst Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF

NOBLAProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

In short

FID The Aristocrats formula with a passport. FID applies S&P's long dividend-record discipline to companies outside the US, holding roughly 80 international payers in one index fund and paying cash out quarterly.

NOBL Dividend investing without the yield chase. NOBL holds roughly 70 S&P 500 companies picked for their records as dividend growers, not for the fattest payout on the screen. A purist's take on the theme, running since 2013.

Stated mandate

FID The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index by investing principally in the securities comprising that Index.

NOBL The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index.

Why people hold it

  • FID The ex-US branch of a famous family: it tracks the S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index, taking the long dividend-record screen overseas instead of down the S&P 500 roster.ftportfolios.com
  • Rules do the picking. It has run as a passive index fund since 2013, with the quality and value screen written into the benchmark rather than left to a manager's mood.
  • Roughly 80 holdings spread the income across many companies, and the fund distributes on a quarterly cadence.
  • NOBL The screen is the product: a slice of about 70 names pulled from the S&P 500 on dividend-growth credentials, not headline yield.
  • At 0.35% a year, it sits below the typical fee in its dividend-growth peer group and matches SDY, the other big S&P dividend index fund.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, and it has tracked its index tightly. One of the stronger builds in its niche.

Worth knowing

  • FID At 0.60% a year, it runs above the US-focused aristocrat funds in its group such as NOBL and SDY. That gap is what the overseas mandate costs.
  • One of the lighter-traded, smaller funds in the category, so bid-ask spreads can add to the cost beyond the expense ratio.
  • The dividends are earned in foreign currencies, so exchange-rate swings show up in both the payouts and the returns a US investor sees.ftportfolios.com
  • NOBL Mid-priced, not cheap. Broad sector-neutral dividend index funds such as SPDG charge a fraction of NOBL's 0.35%.
  • Roughly 70 stocks means real single-name and sector concentration next to the full S&P 500, and it is all-equity, so market drawdowns come through.
  • Cash lands quarterly, not monthly, and the mandate rewards payout consistency rather than the biggest current yield.

Full FID profile⁠

Full NOBL profile⁠

FID vs NOBL Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FID vs NOBL Cost

Overpaying FID vs NOBL

$4,691

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FID 0.60%

    $11,817

  • NOBL 0.35%

    $7,126

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FID 0.60%
  • NOBL 0.35%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530FID $11,817NOBL $7,126

Year by year

YearFIDNOBLOverpaying
10$1,076$634$442
20$4,116$2,454$1,662
30$11,817$7,126$4,691

Expense ratio

  • 0.60%FID
  • 0.35%NOBL, cheaper
  • Middle half of Dividend Aristocrats funds
  • Median 0.40%

NOBL 2nd cheapest of 7 funds

FID 7th cheapest of 7 funds

FID vs NOBL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FID 3.96%, better
NOBL 1.98%
Payout (12M)
FID $0.89
NOBL $1.17
Last payment
FID $0.16
NOBL $0.28
Ex-dividend
FID Sep 24, 2026
NOBL Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
FID Sep 30, 2026
NOBL Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
FID Quarterly
NOBL Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FIDQuarterly · 53 paymentsAll FID payments⁠
One bar per payment. 53 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jan 20, 2017 $0.01; Feb 22, 2017 $0.01; Mar 23, 2017 $0.09; Apr 21, 2017 $0.07; May 23, 2017 $0.12; Jun 22, 2017 $0.10; Jul 21, 2017 $0.07; Aug 22, 2017 $0.07; Sep 21, 2017 $0.10; Oct 20, 2017 $0.07; Nov 21, 2017 $0.11; Dec 21, 2017 $0.10; Jan 23, 2018 $0.02; Feb 21, 2018 $0.01; Mar 22, 2018 $0.17; Apr 20, 2018 $0.05; May 22, 2018 $0.12; Jun 21, 2018 $0.10; Jul 20, 2018 $0.05; Aug 21, 2018 $0.07; Sep 14, 2018 $0.05; Dec 18, 2018 $0.22; Mar 21, 2019 $0.03; Jun 14, 2019 $0.23; Sep 25, 2019 $0.15; Dec 13, 2019 $0.27; Mar 26, 2020 $0.06; Jun 25, 2020 $0.23; Sep 24, 2020 $0.12; Dec 24, 2020 $0.23; Mar 25, 2021 $0.02; Jun 24, 2021 $0.23; Sep 23, 2021 $0.16; Dec 23, 2021 $0.26; Mar 25, 2022 $0.01; Jun 24, 2022 $0.31; Sep 23, 2022 $0.13; Dec 23, 2022 $0.20; Mar 24, 2023 $0.03; Jun 27, 2023 $0.31; Sep 22, 2023 $0.13; Dec 22, 2023 $0.20; Mar 21, 2024 $0.03; Jun 27, 2024 $0.34; Sep 26, 2024 $0.12; Dec 13, 2024 $0.22; Mar 27, 2025 $0.04; Jun 26, 2025 $0.37; Sep 25, 2025 $0.18; Dec 12, 2025 $0.30; Mar 26, 2026 $0.05; Jun 25, 2026 $0.39; Sep 24, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD
NOBLQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll NOBL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.10; Jun 21, 2017 $0.11; Sep 27, 2017 $0.17; Dec 26, 2017 $0.19; Mar 21, 2018 $0.12; Jun 20, 2018 $0.21; Sep 26, 2018 $0.17; Dec 26, 2018 $0.21; Mar 20, 2019 $0.12; Jun 25, 2019 $0.19; Sep 25, 2019 $0.18; Dec 24, 2019 $0.22; Mar 25, 2020 $0.17; Jun 24, 2020 $0.21; Sep 23, 2020 $0.21; Dec 23, 2020 $0.27; Mar 23, 2021 $0.19; Jun 22, 2021 $0.22; Sep 22, 2021 $0.21; Dec 23, 2021 $0.32; Mar 23, 2022 $0.18; Jun 22, 2022 $0.19; Sep 21, 2022 $0.20; Dec 22, 2022 $0.30; Mar 22, 2023 $0.18; Jun 21, 2023 $0.23; Sep 20, 2023 $0.26; Dec 20, 2023 $0.33; Mar 20, 2024 $0.19; Jun 26, 2024 $0.28; Sep 25, 2024 $0.26; Dec 23, 2024 $0.29; Mar 26, 2025 $0.23; Jun 25, 2025 $0.28; Sep 24, 2025 $0.27; Dec 24, 2025 $0.33; Mar 25, 2026 $0.26; Jun 24, 2026 $0.30; Sep 23, 2026 $0.28. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD

FID vs NOBL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FID
  • NOBL
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: FID −29.1% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FID 11.2%, betterNOBL 13.5%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FID 1.40, betterNOBL 0.70
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FID −29.1%NOBL −17.9%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FID 0.75NOBL 0.64

FID and NOBL in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FIDDvsSDYA

    First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NOBLAvsSDYA

    ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FIDDvsREGLB

    First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF · ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NOBLAvsREGLB

    ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF · ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FIDDvsWDIVB

    First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NOBLAvsWDIVB

    ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.