NOBL ranks 2nd and WDIV 3rd of 7 funds in the Dividend Aristocrats Category.
NOBL vs WDIV
NOBL −0.05pt a year
0.35%0.40%
NOBL 147.3×the volume
1.08M7.33K
NOBL +3.1pt
+10.9%+7.8%
NOBL vs WDIV Performance
+40.1%+56.8%
- NOBL 0.35%, better
- WDIV 0.40%
- NOBL $11.9B
- WDIV $281M
- NOBL +19.0%
- WDIV +19.5%, better
- NOBL 1.98%
- WDIV 4.20%, better
- NOBL 69
- WDIV 114
- NOBL 1.08M sh, better
- WDIV 7.33K sh
- NOBL $59.15
- WDIV $82.68
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NOBL | WDIV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B65Higher | C41 |
| Mission | A88Higher | A74 |
| Risk | C41 | A70Higher |
| Tradability | A87Higher | D38 |
| Holdings | B67 | A74Higher |
| Durability | B69Higher | B61 |
Rank among Dividend Aristocrats funds
Same Category. NOBL and WDIV are both graded against the same 7 Dividend Aristocrats funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NOBLA
WDIVB
In short
NOBL Dividend investing without the yield chase. NOBL holds roughly 70 S&P 500 companies picked for their records as dividend growers, not for the fattest payout on the screen. A purist's take on the theme, running since 2013.
WDIV Dividend aristocrats with a passport. WDIV screens the world for companies that have held or raised payouts for at least a decade, buys the top yielders, and caps how much any one stock, sector or country can matter.
Stated mandate
NOBL The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index.
WDIV The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NOBL vs WDIV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NOBL vs WDIV Cost
Overpaying WDIV vs NOBL
$964
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NOBL 0.35%
$7,126
WDIV 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NOBL | WDIV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $723 | $89 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $2,793 | $339 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $8,090 | $964 |
- 0.35%NOBL, cheaper
- 0.40%WDIV
- Middle half of Dividend Aristocrats funds
- Median 0.40%
NOBL 2nd cheapest of 7 funds
WDIV 4th cheapest of 7 funds
NOBL vs WDIV Dividends
- NOBL 1.98%
- WDIV 4.20%, better
- NOBL $1.17
- WDIV $3.48
- NOBL $0.28
- WDIV $0.83
- NOBL Sep 23, 2026
- WDIV Sep 21, 2026
- NOBL Sep 29, 2026
- WDIV Sep 23, 2026
- NOBL Quarterly
- WDIV Quarterly
Distribution history
NOBL vs WDIV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- NOBL
- WDIV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NOBL 13.5%WDIV 11.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- NOBL 0.70WDIV 1.41, better
- Worst fall
- NOBL −17.9%, betterWDIV −22.1%
- Market sensitivity
- NOBL 0.64WDIV 0.72
NOBL and WDIV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

