UNHG ranks 2nd and FIGG 42nd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
FIGG vs UNHG
7.2%by weight
FIGG −0.02pt a year
0.75%0.77%
UNHG 5.0×the volume
145K726K
FIGG vs UNHG Performance
−90.6%+8.4%
- FIGG 0.75%, better
- UNHG 0.77%
- FIGG $9M
- UNHG $63M
- FIGG −90.6%
- UNHG +8.4%, better
- FIGG 5
- UNHG 5
- FIGG 145K sh
- UNHG 726K sh, better
- FIGG $15.62
- UNHG $20.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FIGG | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70Higher | B60 |
| Mission | A98Higher | A90 |
| Risk | D33 | A83Higher |
| Tradability | B66 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B55 | B66Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. FIGG and UNHG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FIGGB
UNHGA
In short
FIGG One ticker, two times Figma's daily move. FIGG rebuilds that exposure every trading day and charges 0.75%, less than the 2x single-stock crowd typically asks.
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
Stated mandate
FIGG The Fund seeks daily returns, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the daily percentage change in the price of FIG common stock. It is intended as a short-term trading vehicle and does not target its multiple over periods other than one trading day.
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FIGG vs UNHG Holdings
How FIGG and UNHG differ
7.2%
Shared holdings make up 13.5% of UNHG and 7.2% of FIGG.
Level by level
- Holdings7.2%
Sector
No Sector split for FIGG and UNHG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in FIGGMore in UNHG | FIGG | UNHG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- FIGG207.3%
- UNHG213.5%
- FIGG1
- UNHG1
Asset class
- FIGG
- Equity
- UNHG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in FIGG0
- In both1
- Only in UNHG0
Only in FIGG
0 securities, 0.0% of FIGG by weight
Only in UNHG
0 securities, 0.0% of UNHG by weight
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in FIGGMore in UNHG | FIGG | UNHG |
|---|---|---|---|
| First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/2040 | UNHG +6.31 points | 7.16% | 13.47% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FIGG vs UNHG Cost
Overpaying UNHG vs FIGG
$347
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FIGG 0.75%
$14,482
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FIGG | UNHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $1,371 | $35 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $5,205 | $127 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $14,829 | $347 |
- 0.75%FIGG, cheaper
- 0.77%UNHG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
FIGG 87th cheapest of 315 funds
UNHG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
FIGG vs UNHG Dividends
- FIGG None
- UNHG
- FIGG
- UNHG $1.90
- FIGG
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- FIGG
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- FIGG
- UNHG Irregular
Distribution history
FIGG vs UNHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FIGG 171.2%UNHG 98.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- FIGG −0.54UNHG 0.90
- Worst fall
- FIGG −95.8%UNHG −57.1%
- Market sensitivity
- FIGG 2.77UNHG 5.19
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.