PANG ranks 3rd and FIGG 42nd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
FIGG vs PANG
FIGG −0.01pt a year
0.75%0.76%
FIGG 3.3×the volume
145K44.6K
FIGG vs PANG Performance
−90.6%+76.3%
- FIGG 0.75%, better
- PANG 0.76%
- FIGG $9M
- PANG $9M
- FIGG −90.6%
- PANG +76.3%, better
- FIGG 5
- PANG 4
- FIGG 145K sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- FIGG $15.62
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FIGG | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A70 |
| Mission | A98Higher | A94 |
| Risk | D33 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | B66 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B55 | B59Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. FIGG and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FIGGB
PANGA
In short
FIGG One ticker, two times Figma's daily move. FIGG rebuilds that exposure every trading day and charges 0.75%, less than the 2x single-stock crowd typically asks.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
FIGG The Fund seeks daily returns, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the daily percentage change in the price of FIG common stock. It is intended as a short-term trading vehicle and does not target its multiple over periods other than one trading day.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FIGG vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FIGG vs PANG Cost
Overpaying PANG vs FIGG
$174
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FIGG 0.75%
$14,482
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FIGG | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $1,353 | $17 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $5,142 | $64 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $14,656 | $174 |
- 0.75%FIGG, cheaper
- 0.76%PANG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
FIGG 87th cheapest of 315 funds
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
FIGG vs PANG Dividends
- FIGG None
- PANG
- FIGG
- PANG $1.30
- FIGG
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- FIGG
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- FIGG
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
FIGG vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FIGG 171.2%PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- FIGG −0.54PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- FIGG −95.8%PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- FIGG 2.77PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.