FLJH ranks 3rd and FJP 12th of 18 funds in the Japan Category.
FJP vs FLJH
FLJH −0.71pt a year
0.80%0.09%
FLJH 2.4×the volume
14.6K34.3K
FLJH +10.5pt
+10.2%+20.7%
FJP vs FLJH Performance
+62.6%+156.4%
- FJP 0.80%
- FLJH 0.09%, better
- FJP $263M
- FLJH $201M
- FJP +12.6%
- FLJH +21.9%, better
- FJP 2.66%
- FLJH 6.20%, better
- FJP 102
- FLJH 448
- FJP 14.6K sh
- FLJH 34.3K sh, better
- FJP $73.08
- FLJH $44.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FJP | FLJH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D26 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A96 | |
| Risk | F18 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | D31 | C52Higher |
| Holdings | B69 | A74Higher |
| Durability | A71Higher | C53 |
Rank among Japan funds
Same Category. FJP and FLJH are both graded against the same 18 Japan funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FJPC
FLJHA
In short
FJP Most Japan ETFs buy the market by size. FJP scores Japanese stocks on growth and value, then holds roughly 100 of the highest scorers, weighted by rank rather than market cap. A stock-picker's rulebook in an index wrapper.
FLJH Japan stocks with the yen taken out of the equation. FLJH hedges the currency back to dollars for 0.09% a year, the same fee as Franklin's unhedged twin and a fraction of the typical Japan fund.
Stated mandate
FJP The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX® JapanTM Index.
FLJH The Fund seeks to closely track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the FTSE Japan Capped Hedged Index through passive indexing, using replication or representative sampling.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FJP vs FLJH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FJP vs FLJH Cost
Overpaying FJP vs FLJH
$13,448
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FJP 0.80%
$15,346
FLJH 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FJP | FLJH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,422 | $165 | $1,257 |
| 20 | $5,393 | $646 | $4,747 |
| 30 | $15,346 | $1,898 | $13,448 |
- 0.80%FJP
- 0.09%FLJH, cheaper
- Middle half of Japan funds
- Median 0.54%
FLJH cheapest of 18 funds
FJP 14th cheapest of 18 funds
FJP vs FLJH Dividends
- FJP 2.66%
- FLJH 6.20%, better
- FJP $1.93
- FLJH $2.74
- FJP $0.48
- FLJH $0.29
- FJP Jun 25, 2026
- FLJH Jun 26, 2026
- FJP Jun 30, 2026
- FLJH Jul 6, 2026
- FJP Quarterly
- FLJH Twice a year
Distribution history
FJP vs FLJH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FJP
- FLJH
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FJP 15.2%FLJH 12.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FJP 0.89FLJH 1.59, better
- Worst fall
- FJP −26.8%FLJH −20.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FJP 0.83FLJH 0.62
Popular comparisons
- 0.80% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.