FLJP ranks 1st and FLJH 3rd of 18 funds in the Japan Category.
FLJH vs FLJP
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.09%0.09%
FLJP 28.5×the volume
34.3K976K
FLJH +11.5pt
+20.7%+9.2%
FLJH vs FLJP Performance
+156.4%+55.0%
- FLJH 0.09%
- FLJP 0.09%
- FLJH $201M
- FLJP $4.27B
- FLJH +21.9%, better
- FLJP +16.4%
- FLJH 6.20%, better
- FLJP 4.26%
- FLJH 448
- FLJP 447
- FLJH 34.3K sh
- FLJP 976K sh, better
- FLJH $44.77
- FLJP $39.98
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLJH | FLJP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97 | A97 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B62Higher | C48 |
| Tradability | C52 | A71Higher |
| Holdings | A74 | A74 |
| Durability | C53 | B61Higher |
Rank among Japan funds
Same Category. FLJH and FLJP are both graded against the same 18 Japan funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLJHA
FLJPA
In short
FLJH Japan stocks with the yen taken out of the equation. FLJH hedges the currency back to dollars for 0.09% a year, the same fee as Franklin's unhedged twin and a fraction of the typical Japan fund.
FLJP Japan's whole market for nine basis points. FLJP tracks the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index across roughly 500 stocks at 0.09%, a fraction of what the typical Japan fund charges.
Stated mandate
FLJH The Fund seeks to closely track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the FTSE Japan Capped Hedged Index through passive indexing, using replication or representative sampling.
FLJP The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLJH vs FLJP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLJH vs FLJP Cost
Same expense ratio
$1,898
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLJH 0.09%
$1,898
FLJP 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLJH | FLJP |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $165 | $165 |
| 20 | $646 | $646 |
| 30 | $1,898 | $1,898 |
- 0.09%FLJH
- 0.09%FLJP
- Middle half of Japan funds
- Median 0.54%
FLJH cheapest of 18 funds
FLJP cheapest of 18 funds
FLJH vs FLJP Dividends
- FLJH 6.20%, better
- FLJP 4.26%
- FLJH $2.74
- FLJP $1.69
- FLJH $0.29
- FLJP $0.17
- FLJH Jun 26, 2026
- FLJP Jun 26, 2026
- FLJH Jul 6, 2026
- FLJP Jul 6, 2026
- FLJH Twice a year
- FLJP Twice a year
Distribution history
FLJH vs FLJP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLJH
- FLJP
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLJH 12.5%FLJP 12.5%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- FLJH 1.59, betterFLJP 1.17
- Worst fall
- FLJH −20.4%, betterFLJP −28.8%
- Market sensitivity
- FLJH 0.62FLJP 0.96
FLJH and FLJP in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.48%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.48%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
