GIGB ranks 4th and FLCO 23rd of 49 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate Category.
FLCO vs GIGB
GIGB −0.27pt a year
0.35%0.08%
FLCO 1.1×the volume
89.3K83.7K
GIGB +0.2pt
−0.4%−0.2%
FLCO vs GIGB Performance
−2.1%−0.8%
- FLCO 0.35%
- GIGB 0.08%, better
- FLCO $541M
- GIGB $1.04B
- FLCO −0.8%
- GIGB −0.5%, better
- FLCO 4.93%, better
- GIGB 4.77%
- FLCO 233
- GIGB 2719
- FLCO 89.3K sh, better
- GIGB 83.7K sh
- FLCO $20.68
- GIGB $44.25
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLCO | GIGB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D29 | A94Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C54 | C54 |
| Tradability | B64Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | C45 | A87Higher |
| Durability | A73 | A74Higher |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate funds
Same Category. FLCO and GIGB are both graded against the same 49 Investment Grade Corporate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLCOB
GIGBA
In short
FLCO Most investment-grade corporate ETFs hand you the index and get out of the way. FLCO is the active take: Franklin's bond team picks roughly 220 corporates against the Bloomberg investment-grade benchmark, and pays income monthly.
GIGB Most investment-grade corporate bond funds just buy the biggest borrowers. Goldman's index screens the market on liquidity and fundamentals first, then spreads the money across roughly 1,600 bonds for 0.08% a year.
Stated mandate
FLCO The Fund seeks a high level of current income consistent with prudent investing while also seeking preservation of capital.
GIGB The Fund seeks to track the FTSE Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index, which measures U.S.-dollar-denominated investment-grade corporate bonds meeting liquidity and fundamental screening criteria.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLCO vs GIGB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLCO vs GIGB Cost
Overpaying FLCO vs GIGB
$5,437
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLCO 0.35%
$7,126
GIGB 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLCO | GIGB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $147 | $487 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $575 | $1,879 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $1,689 | $5,437 |
- 0.35%FLCO
- 0.08%GIGB, cheaper
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate funds
- Median 0.25%
GIGB 4th cheapest of 49 funds
FLCO 33rd cheapest of 49 funds
FLCO vs GIGB Dividends
- FLCO 4.93%, better
- GIGB 4.77%
- FLCO $1.02
- GIGB $2.12
- FLCO $0.09
- GIGB $0.18
- FLCO Oct 1, 2026
- GIGB Oct 1, 2026
- FLCO Oct 6, 2026
- GIGB Oct 7, 2026
- FLCO Monthly
- GIGB Monthly
Distribution history
FLCO vs GIGB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLCO
- GIGB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLCO 6.2%, betterGIGB 6.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- FLCO 0.27GIGB 0.30, better
- Worst fall
- FLCO −22.1%GIGB −21.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FLCO 1.09GIGB 1.04
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.