Skip to content

FLDZ vs FOWF

TrueShares Patriot Defense ETF

FLDZBCboe

Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF

FOWFBCboe

Overlap

14.0%by weight

Expense ratio

FLDZ −0.09pt a year

FLDZ0.40%FOWF0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

FOWF 14.3×the volume

FLDZ125FOWF1.79K

FLDZ vs FOWF Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−7.5%FLDZ+11.9%FOWF

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. FLDZ −7.5%. FOWF +11.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%20%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FLDZ 0.40%, better
FOWF 0.49%
Fund size
FLDZ $7M
FOWF $15M
1Y total return
FLDZ −7.5%
FOWF +11.9%, better
Yield (12M)
FLDZ 1.69%, better
FOWF 0.74%
Holdings
FLDZ 66
FOWF 88
Avg volume (30D)
FLDZ 125 sh
FOWF 1.79K sh, better
NAV per share
FLDZ $27.37
FOWF $35.06
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FLDZ: Cost 76, Risk 42, Mission 42, Tradability 36, Holdings 92, Durability 62. FOWF: Cost 52, Risk 89, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 75, Durability 64.
Pillar letters and Scores for FLDZ, FOWF, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFLDZFOWF
Cost30% weightA76HigherC52
Mission25% weightC42Not scored
Risk15% weightC42A89Higher
Tradability15% weightD36C46Higher
Holdings10% weightA92HigherA75
Durability5% weightB62B64Higher

Rank among Defense & Aerospace funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FLDZ and FOWF are both graded against the same 25 Defense & Aerospace funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Defense & Aerospace⁠

Category · 25 funds
See all 25 ›

FLDZ ranks 3rd and FOWF 4th of 25 funds in the Defense & Aerospace Category.

  1. Rank 1AXARState Street SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETFScore 78
  2. Rank 2AITAiShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETFScore 74
  3. Rank 3BFLDZTrueShares Patriot Defense ETFScore 62
  4. Rank 4BFOWFPacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETFScore 61
  5. Rank 5BPPAInvesco Aerospace & Defense ETFScore 60

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FLDZBTrueShares Patriot Defense ETF

FOWFBPacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF

In short

FLDZ A defense-stock ETF with an unusual arrangement: the adviser's management fee, less fund expenses, goes to the Folds of Honor Foundation. Launched in 2021 as a patriot-themed core equity fund, it now runs an active, concentrated book of aerospace and defense names.

FOWF Most defense funds are built around the old primes. FOWF tracks the Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index, aimed at companies behind emerging defense technology across the U.S. and allied nations.

Stated mandate

FLDZ The Fund seeks capital growth.

FOWF The Fund seeks capital appreciation by tracking companies that support critical emerging defense technologies in the U.S. and its allied nations.

Why people hold it

  • FLDZ The adviser's management fee, less fund operating expenses, goes to Folds of Honor, a charity funding scholarships for families of fallen or disabled service members and first responders.true-shares.comtrue-shares.com 2
  • Charges 0.40% a year, below the median for its actively managed US stock peers. The charitable angle does not arrive with a premium price tag attached.
  • The mandate is spelled out: at least 80% of net assets in aerospace and defense companies as classified by GICS, with a policy of concentrating in that industry. No guessing what you own.sec.gov
  • FOWF Points at the next war, not the last one: the index targets companies supporting critical emerging defense technologies, not a broad aerospace-and-defense basket.
  • 0.49% a year, right at the middle of the defense-theme pack. No niche premium charged for the narrower mandate.
  • The mandate covers the U.S. and its allied nations, so allied suppliers abroad are in scope, not just Pentagon contractors.
  • Roughly 100 holdings spread the theme across many names instead of a few giants, and the fund distributes quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • FLDZ The strategy was rewritten in 2026 from broad US-economy equities to defense companies, so the fund's older track record reflects a different portfolio.sec.govsec.gov 2
  • Non-diversified and concentrated in one industry, so a single contract award or budget headline moves it more than it would a broad market fund.sec.gov
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so bid-ask spreads tend to run wider than on heavily traded ETFs. Limit orders matter more here.
  • FOWF Launched in December 2024, so the track record is short and any read on its risk profile rests on limited history.
  • Small and thinly traded next to category heavyweights like ITA and XAR, which can mean wider spreads on larger orders.
  • A narrow theme tied to defense budgets and procurement cycles, so it can move very differently from a broad market fund.

Full FLDZ profile⁠

Full FOWF profile⁠

FLDZ vs FOWF Holdings

As of

How FLDZ and FOWF differ

Overlap by weight

14.0%

Shared holdings make up 41.5% of FOWF and 16.9% of FLDZ.

Level by level

  • Holdings10 in both14.0%
  • Sector5 Sectors64.6%
  • Countryby domicile93.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in FLDZ and FOWF, widest gap first
SectorMore in FLDZMore in FOWF
IndustrialsFLDZ +35.4 points
TechnologyFOWF +28.5 points
CommunicationFOWF +4.2 points
Consumer DiscretionaryFOWF +1.4 points
MaterialsFOWF +1.4 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in FLDZ and FOWF, widest gap first
CountryMore in FLDZMore in FOWF
United StatesFLDZ +3.8 points
CanadaFOWF +2.0 points
United KingdomFOWF +1.9 points
ItalyFLDZ +1.1 points
NetherlandsFLDZ +1.0 points
FranceFOWF +0.9 points
NorwayFOWF +0.8 points
GermanyFLDZ +0.7 points
Other countries (3)FOWF +1.0 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • FLDZ18.7%
  • FOWF47.1%

Securities held

  • FLDZ66
  • FOWF86

Asset class

FLDZ
Equity
FOWF
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in FLDZ56
  • In both10
  • Only in FOWF76

Only in FLDZ

56 securities, 83.1% of FLDZ by weight

  • Karman Holdings Inc2.01%
  • Huntington Ingalls Industries1.93%
  • Cadre Holdings Inc1.88%

Only in FOWF

76 securities, 58.4% of FOWF by weight

  • Leidos Holdings Inc3.69%
  • BAE Systems PLC2.56%
  • Strategy Inc1.07%

Weight gaps

All 10 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in FLDZ and FOWF, widest gap first
HoldingMore in FLDZMore in FOWF
Northrop Grumman CorpNOCFOWF +5.49 points
Lockheed Martin CorpLMTFOWF +5.28 points
Boeing Co/TheBAFOWF +5.15 points
Rtx CorporationRTXFOWF +5.06 points
General Dynamics CorpGDFOWF +5.04 points
L3Harris Technologies IncLHXFOWF +1.40 points
TransDigm Group IncTDGFLDZ +1.07 points
Honeywell Aerospace IncHONAFLDZ +0.96 points

All 66 FLDZ holdings⁠All 93 FOWF holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FLDZ vs FOWF Cost

Overpaying FOWF vs FLDZ

$1,702

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FLDZ 0.40%

    $8,090

  • FOWF 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FLDZ 0.40%
  • FOWF 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530FOWF $9,792FLDZ $8,090

Year by year

YearFLDZFOWFOverpaying
10$723$883$160
20$2,793$3,394$601
30$8,090$9,792$1,702

Expense ratio

  • 0.40%FLDZ, cheaper
  • 0.49%FOWF
  • Middle half of Defense & Aerospace funds
  • Median 0.50%

FLDZ 6th cheapest of 25 funds

FOWF 11th cheapest of 25 funds

FLDZ vs FOWF Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FLDZ 1.69%, better
FOWF 0.74%
Payout (12M)
FLDZ $0.45
FOWF $0.26
Last payment
FLDZ $0.45
FOWF $0.06
Ex-dividend
FLDZ Dec 24, 2025
FOWF Sep 3, 2026
Paid on
FLDZ Dec 26, 2025
FOWF Sep 8, 2026
Frequency
FLDZ Annual
FOWF Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

FLDZAnnual · 4 paymentsAll FLDZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 29, 2022 $0.33; Dec 27, 2023 $0.33; Dec 27, 2024 $0.32; Dec 24, 2025 $0.45. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
FOWFQuarterly · 7 paymentsAll FOWF payments⁠
One bar per payment. 7 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Mar 6, 2025 $0.03; Jun 5, 2025 $0.11; Sep 4, 2025 $0.05; Dec 30, 2025 $0.05; Mar 5, 2026 $0.03; Jun 4, 2026 $0.12; Sep 3, 2026 $0.06. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

FLDZ vs FOWF Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FLDZ 14.5%FOWF 13.1%since Jan 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FLDZ 0.35FOWF 1.36since Jan 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FLDZ −25.1%since Jan 2022FOWF −12.3%since Dec 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FLDZ 0.77FOWF 0.55

Popular comparisons

  • FLDZBvsXARA

    TrueShares Patriot Defense ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FOWFBvsXARA

    Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLDZBvsITAA

    TrueShares Patriot Defense ETF · iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.37%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FOWFBvsITAA

    Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF · iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.37%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLDZBvsPPAB

    TrueShares Patriot Defense ETF · Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.58%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FOWFBvsPPAB

    Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF · Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.58%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.