Skip to content

FLDZ vs ITA

TrueShares Patriot Defense ETF

FLDZBCboe

iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF

ITAACboe

Overlap

36.8%by weight

Expense ratio

ITA −0.03pt a year

FLDZ0.40%ITA0.37%

Avg volume · 30D

ITA 5972.6×the volume

FLDZ125ITA747K

3Y return · a year

ITA +16.0pt

FLDZ+8.9%ITA+24.9%

FLDZ vs ITA Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−7.5%FLDZ−2.6%ITA

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. FLDZ −7.5%. ITA −2.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.5%10%15%20%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FLDZ 0.40%
ITA 0.37%, better
Fund size
FLDZ $7M
ITA $12.2B
1Y total return
FLDZ −7.5%
ITA −2.6%, better
Yield (12M)
FLDZ 1.69%, better
ITA 0.27%
Holdings
FLDZ 66
ITA 52
Avg volume (30D)
FLDZ 125 sh
ITA 747K sh, better
NAV per share
FLDZ $27.37
ITA $209.66
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FLDZ: Cost 76, Risk 42, Mission 42, Tradability 36, Holdings 92, Durability 62. ITA: Cost 80, Risk 61, Mission 76, Tradability 96, Holdings 34, Durability 98.
Pillar letters and Scores for FLDZ, ITA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFLDZITA
Cost30% weightA76A80Higher
Mission25% weightC42A76Higher
Risk15% weightC42B61Higher
Tradability15% weightD36A96Higher
Holdings10% weightA92HigherD34
Durability5% weightB62A98Higher

Rank among Defense & Aerospace funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FLDZ and ITA are both graded against the same 25 Defense & Aerospace funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Defense & Aerospace⁠

Category · 25 funds
See all 25 ›

ITA ranks 2nd and FLDZ 3rd of 25 funds in the Defense & Aerospace Category.

  1. Rank 1AXARState Street SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETFScore 78
  2. Rank 2AITAiShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETFScore 74
  3. Rank 3BFLDZTrueShares Patriot Defense ETFScore 62
  4. Rank 4BFOWFPacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETFScore 61

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FLDZBTrueShares Patriot Defense ETF

ITAAiShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF

In short

FLDZ A defense-stock ETF with an unusual arrangement: the adviser's management fee, less fund expenses, goes to the Folds of Honor Foundation. Launched in 2021 as a patriot-themed core equity fund, it now runs an active, concentrated book of aerospace and defense names.

ITA The 2006 original in aerospace and defense, and still the anchor fund of the category. It follows a market-cap-weighted index of U.S. aircraft, parts and weapons makers, so the big primes carry most of the weight.

Stated mandate

FLDZ The Fund seeks capital growth.

ITA The fund is designed to follow an index of U.S. equity companies focused on aerospace and defense.

Why people hold it

  • FLDZ The adviser's management fee, less fund operating expenses, goes to Folds of Honor, a charity funding scholarships for families of fallen or disabled service members and first responders.true-shares.comtrue-shares.com 2
  • Charges 0.40% a year, below the median for its actively managed US stock peers. The charitable angle does not arrive with a premium price tag attached.
  • The mandate is spelled out: at least 80% of net assets in aerospace and defense companies as classified by GICS, with a policy of concentrating in that industry. No guessing what you own.sec.gov
  • ITA Charges 0.37% a year, below the typical defense-fund fee and a whisker off the cheapest large rival, XAR at 0.35%.
  • Trading since 2006 and now a multi-billion-dollar, actively traded fund: the long-standing incumbent in U.S. aerospace and defense.
  • The index weights by market cap but caps any single company's weight, so the biggest primes lead without swallowing the whole portfolio.spglobal.com
  • One of the strongest builds in a crowded defense peer group, with a plain-vanilla index mandate and quarterly payouts.

Worth knowing

  • FLDZ The strategy was rewritten in 2026 from broad US-economy equities to defense companies, so the fund's older track record reflects a different portfolio.sec.govsec.gov 2
  • Non-diversified and concentrated in one industry, so a single contract award or budget headline moves it more than it would a broad market fund.sec.gov
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so bid-ask spreads tend to run wider than on heavily traded ETFs. Limit orders matter more here.
  • ITA About 50 stocks, cap-weighted: a few primes drive most of the ride. XAR's modified equal weight spreads exposure further down the size ladder.ssga.com
  • One U.S. industry, running on two engines: government procurement and commercial aircraft demand. Narrower than a broad-market fund by design.ishares.com
  • Holds a representative sample of the index rather than every constituent, which can leave small gaps versus the benchmark.sec.gov

Full FLDZ profile⁠

Full ITA profile⁠

FLDZ vs ITA Holdings

How FLDZ and ITA differ

Overlap by weight

36.8%

Shared holdings make up 98.5% of ITA and 73.0% of FLDZ.

Level by level

  • Sector6 Sectors0.0%
  • Holdings47 in both36.8%
  • Countryby domicile84.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in FLDZ and ITA, widest gap first
SectorMore in FLDZMore in ITA
Aerospace & DefenseITA +99.9 points
IndustrialsFLDZ +94.3 points
TechnologyFLDZ +3.3 points
MaterialsFLDZ +1.2 points
CommunicationFLDZ +1.2 points
Leisure ProductsITA +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in FLDZ and ITA, widest gap first
CountryMore in FLDZMore in ITA
United StatesITA +16.0 points
United KingdomFLDZ +4.8 points
GermanyFLDZ +3.1 points
FranceFLDZ +3.0 points
SwedenFLDZ +1.8 points
ItalyFLDZ +1.7 points
NetherlandsFLDZ +1.6 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • FLDZ18.7%
  • ITA76.3%

Securities held

  • FLDZ66
  • ITA50

Asset class

FLDZ
Equity
ITA
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in FLDZ19
  • In both47
  • Only in ITA3

Only in FLDZ

19 securities, 27.0% of FLDZ by weight

  • Saab AB1.79%
  • BAE Systems PLC1.71%
  • Melrose Industries PLC1.69%

Only in ITA

3 securities, 1.5% of ITA by weight

  • Heico Class A1.38%
  • Sturm Ruger0.05%
  • Smith Wesson Brands Inc0.05%

Weight gaps

All 47 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in FLDZ and ITA, widest gap first
HoldingMore in FLDZMore in ITA
General Electric CoGEITA +18.46 points
Rtx CorporationRTXITA +15.51 points
Boeing Co/TheBAITA +5.39 points
Lockheed Martin CorpLMTITA +3.70 points
Northrop Grumman CorpNOCITA +3.28 points
General Dynamics CorpGDITA +3.16 points
TransDigm Group IncTDGITA +3.07 points
Howmet Aerospace IncHWMITA +2.57 points

All 66 FLDZ holdings⁠All 50 ITA holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FLDZ vs ITA Cost

Overpaying FLDZ vs ITA

$577

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FLDZ 0.40%

    $8,090

  • ITA 0.37%

    $7,513

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FLDZ 0.40%
  • ITA 0.37%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530FLDZ $8,090ITA $7,513

Year by year

YearFLDZITAOverpaying
10$723$670$53
20$2,793$2,590$203
30$8,090$7,513$577

Expense ratio

  • 0.40%FLDZ
  • 0.37%ITA, cheaper
  • Middle half of Defense & Aerospace funds
  • Median 0.50%

ITA 5th cheapest of 25 funds

FLDZ 6th cheapest of 25 funds

FLDZ vs ITA Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FLDZ 1.69%, better
ITA 0.27%
Payout (12M)
FLDZ $0.45
ITA $0.57
Last payment
FLDZ $0.45
ITA $0.25
Ex-dividend
FLDZ Dec 24, 2025
ITA Sep 15, 2026
Paid on
FLDZ Dec 26, 2025
ITA Sep 18, 2026
Frequency
FLDZ Annual
ITA Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FLDZAnnual · 4 paymentsAll FLDZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 29, 2022 $0.33; Dec 27, 2023 $0.33; Dec 27, 2024 $0.32; Dec 24, 2025 $0.45. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
ITAQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll ITA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.16; Jun 27, 2017 $0.19; Sep 26, 2017 $0.35; Dec 19, 2017 $0.16; Mar 22, 2018 $0.21; Jun 26, 2018 $0.22; Sep 26, 2018 $0.43; Dec 17, 2018 $0.11; Mar 20, 2019 $0.29; Jun 17, 2019 $0.31; Sep 24, 2019 $0.29; Dec 16, 2019 $0.53; Dec 30, 2019 $0.29; Mar 25, 2020 $0.39; Jun 15, 2020 $0.21; Sep 23, 2020 $0.20; Dec 14, 2020 $0.20; Mar 25, 2021 $0.32; Jun 10, 2021 $0.19; Sep 24, 2021 $0.18; Dec 13, 2021 $0.16; Mar 24, 2022 $0.16; Jun 9, 2022 $0.28; Sep 26, 2022 $0.38; Dec 13, 2022 $0.24; Mar 23, 2023 $0.28; Jun 7, 2023 $0.24; Sep 26, 2023 $0.22; Dec 20, 2023 $0.43; Mar 21, 2024 $0.27; Jun 11, 2024 $0.30; Sep 25, 2024 $0.23; Dec 17, 2024 $0.44; Mar 18, 2025 $0.25; Jun 16, 2025 $0.17; Sep 16, 2025 $0.75; Mar 17, 2026 $0.15; Jun 15, 2026 $0.16; Sep 15, 2026 $0.25. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

FLDZ vs ITA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FLDZ 14.5%, betterITA 18.5%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FLDZ 0.35ITA 1.06, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FLDZ −25.1%since Jan 2022ITA −20.0%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FLDZ 0.77ITA 0.98

FLDZ and ITA in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FLDZBvsXARA

    TrueShares Patriot Defense ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ITAAvsXARA

    iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.37% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLDZBvsFOWFB

    TrueShares Patriot Defense ETF · Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ITAAvsFOWFB

    iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF · Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.37% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLDZBvsPPAB

    TrueShares Patriot Defense ETF · Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.58%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ITAAvsPPAB

    iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF · Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.37% · 0.58%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.